If you look under your little picture -thingy on the left of your post you'll see the the TSEx system assigns the title "Emerged" to newer posters. However, I believe that the system does enable you to substitute your own sobriquet.“But I don't believe that and think GPUs are still required in cars in addition to Akida.” was my opinion to the question I asked you in my reply to you. In your reply you quoted Peter but what he had said was he needed 100 Akida1000 chips. Again this makes the original claim unbalanced and does that mean 100x AKIDA 1.0 out performs GPUs and CPUs? In any case these are big claims and if correct, should be somewhere in company presentations, yet I don't recall seeing this in any of the presentations.
I'm sure our development team is well aware of Akida's capabilities and probably thats why they are targeting the edge AI market. Now if a 25 dollar Akida1.0 could replace a 2000 dollar odd GPU then that would be one of our biggest use cases, and as alwaysgreen pointed out Akida would be flying off shelves. Also don't forget all the GPUs that Akida could replace in crypto mining and those are big polluters. So why is BRN not marketing these if Akida could do the same at very low power and outperform GPUs??
As for the Sandia article, I thank you for posting that and I enjoyed reading it. I quoted their concluding remarks to highlight that we can't generalise that "AKIDA 1.0 out performs GPUs and CPUs." without specifying in what way.
Also I never said that Akida has no use cases in gaming. "Gaming" is a very broad term and you are taking things out of context. There are lots of elements there like VR headsets, cameras, and all those different types of game controllers. This discussion was about Akida1.0 Vs GPUs/CPUs and here is what I said for clarity.
"If I'm not correct I would like to be pointed to at least one presentation slide or other company source that claims that Akida can replace GPUs in cars or other graphics-heavy applications like gaming."
About my comment on you making fun, this is what I was referring to.
This was my original post.
View attachment 20667
This is the first comment I was referring to: post #34,739
View attachment 20668
I was not aware there was some sort of a ranking system in TSEx similar to the army.
This is the second one in post #34,794
View attachment 20669
I don't really care about the second one but didn't appreciate the first one. Would have been better if you had come directly at me if you thought my post was an attempt to diminish the importance of your post without commenting elsewhere. Anyway please don't waste your time to go back and remove or edit these.
Hi Fries, where did you see that? I've been looking all morning on https://www.asx.com.au/data/shortsell.txt12 million more shorts taken out on Friday. if you think that wasn't part of a planned attack think again. Its a rough ride to success at the moment but confident we are doing most things right. Would love a menaingful annoucement though!.
hey! yep at that linkHi Fries, where did you see that? I've been looking all morning on https://www.asx.com.au/data/shortsell.txt
Hi Fries, where did you see that? I've been looking all morning on https://www.asx.com.au/data/shortsell.txt
In gaming circles this would be called an “Easter Egg” - a delightful medium for “hidden messages” or in jokes passing between the developers/programmers and users in the know or who stumble across them.What if it wasn't a mistake and was intentional... BMW !!!![]()
I think the law of diminishing returns begins to kick in in silicon at these lower sizes. Wafer yield % goes down and the resistance of the connexions becomes significant.Yes, I came across that, but note that it´s only the 5-nanometer plant. Also the CEO of TSMC says something along the lines that it´s unprofitable to produce in the US.
Samsung can as of now produce 3-nanomenter, although at limited capacity. They target 2-nanomenter in a couple of years. So why wouldn´t the most advanced just move their production to South Korea?
Intel has some years before they reach 3-nanometers.
I get a huge degree of comfort from the amount of engineering and scientific posts as well as the opinions of highly credentialed people sharing their valuable assessments of this company , now known as the beast . Thursdays after close 4C announcementIf you look under your little picture -thingy on the left of your post you'll see the the TSEx system assigns the title "Emerged" to newer posters. However, I believe that the system does enable you to substitute your own sobriquet.
The point is that there were a few "Emerged" posters who popped up after the 4C with negative or disparaging posts, a tactic which is employed by downrampers and manipulators who seek to dance on the grave of BRN whenever there is news which does not the expectations of the enthusiasts.
Yes I know my profile is marked as emerged but how is that relevant to the question I raised? Does that mean the frequent posters here get the automatic right to bully new posters? I don't mean FF here but I just saw one few mins ago. Do they have to be bullied just because they have a different view? Do we have to show our holding in BRN and educational qualifications before we can question something or is there a minimum waiting period or a number of posts we have to complete? Do you as an experienced engineer think that my original question was irrational?If you look under your little picture -thingy on the left of your post you'll see the the TSEx system assigns the title "Emerged" to newer posters. However, I believe that the system does enable you to substitute your own sobriquet.
The point is that there were a few "Emerged" posters who popped up after the 4C with negative or disparaging posts, a tactic which is employed by downrampers and manipulators who seek to dance on the grave of BRN whenever there is news which does not the expectations of the enthusiasts.
Yes, I saw a prediction probably 15-20 years ago, that at 2nm, there would only be space for one foundry in the world, because of the expense of making the factory. Still, Samsung seems like the obvious foundry to go to, they have production of the advanced nodes now and will be even more advanced before TSMC get their 5 nm factory up and running in the US.I think the law of diminishing returns begins to kick in in silicon at these lower sizes. Wafer yield % goes down and the resistance of the connexions becomes significant.
Sony has developed a 3D stacked chip to overcome the death of Moore's Law, but again I would guess that that would bring it's own problems with heat. I think the Prophesee/Sony camera uses the technology by stacking the pixels on top of the DVS logic ... and we all know what Prophesee thinks of Akida.
https://www.prophesee.ai/
View attachment 20676
Not saying this going to happen but if Pingo moves on Taiwan and the USA retaliates this could signal to North Korea to come to the support of its largest and only friend and attack Sth Korea to flank the USA by opening up two fronts and where is your Samsung then?Yes, I came across that, but note that it´s only the 5-nanometer plant. Also the CEO of TSMC says something along the lines that it´s unprofitable to produce in the US.
Samsung can as of now produce 3-nanomenter, although at limited capacity. They target 2-nanomenter in a couple of years. So why wouldn´t the most advanced just move their production to South Korea?
Intel has some years before they reach 3-nanometers.
Certainly Akida is not part of the new Sony/Prophesee development kit as our engagement announcement is much too recent ... I just like to think that in the future it could well be included. Sony has been long on analog CNNs.Yes, I saw a prediction probably 15-20 years ago, that at 2nm, there would only be space for one foundry in the world, because of the expense of making the factory. Still, Samsung seems like the obvious foundry to go to, they have production of the advanced nodes now and will be even more advanced before TSMC get their 5 nm factory up and running in the US.
I saw the thing about Sony and Prophesee, what I haven´t been able to establish is whether Brainchip will be a part of the equation and I suspect it´s unlikely at least for the first generation.
Hi @Milo“But I don't believe that and think GPUs are still required in cars in addition to Akida.” was my opinion to the question I asked you in my reply to you. In your reply you quoted Peter but what he had said was he needed 100 Akida1000 chips. Again this makes the original claim unbalanced and does that mean 100x AKIDA 1.0 out performs GPUs and CPUs? In any case these are big claims and if correct, should be somewhere in company presentations, yet I don't recall seeing this in any of the presentations.
I'm sure our development team is well aware of Akida's capabilities and probably thats why they are targeting the edge AI market. Now if a 25 dollar Akida1.0 could replace a 2000 dollar odd GPU then that would be one of our biggest use cases, and as alwaysgreen pointed out Akida would be flying off shelves. Also don't forget all the GPUs that Akida could replace in crypto mining and those are big polluters. So why is BRN not marketing these if Akida could do the same at very low power and outperform GPUs??
As for the Sandia article, I thank you for posting that and I enjoyed reading it. I quoted their concluding remarks to highlight that we can't generalise that "AKIDA 1.0 out performs GPUs and CPUs." without specifying in what way.
Also I never said that Akida has no use cases in gaming. "Gaming" is a very broad term and you are taking things out of context. There are lots of elements there like VR headsets, cameras, and all those different types of game controllers. This discussion was about Akida1.0 Vs GPUs/CPUs and here is what I said for clarity.
"If I'm not correct I would like to be pointed to at least one presentation slide or other company source that claims that Akida can replace GPUs in cars or other graphics-heavy applications like gaming."
About my comment on you making fun, this is what I was referring to.
This was my original post.
View attachment 20667
This is the first comment I was referring to: post #34,739
View attachment 20668
I was not aware there was some sort of a ranking system in TSEx similar to the army.
This is the second one in post #34,794
View attachment 20669
I don't really care about the second one but didn't appreciate the first one. Would have been better if you had come directly at me if you thought my post was an attempt to diminish the importance of your post without commenting elsewhere. Anyway please don't waste your time to go back and remove or edit these.
I´m not in doubt that Akida is going many placesCertainly Akida is not part of the new Sony/Prophesee development kit as our engagement announcement is much too recent ... I just like to think that in the future it could well be included. Sony has been long on analog CNNs.
US2022020757A1 SEMICONDUCTOR STORAGE DEVICE AND NEURAL NETWORK DEVICE
A neural network device comprising:
a substrate;
a first storage element formed on the substrate and including a first insulating film, the first storage element functioning as a buffer memory that temporarily stores a multiply-accumulate operation result; and
a second storage element formed on the substrate and including a second insulating film having a film thickness of equal to or greater than 0.5 times and equal to or less than 2 times a film thickness of the first insulating film, the second storage element differing from the first storage element in power consumption at a time of writing and functioning as an analog multiplier-accumulator.
This Sony patent is interesting in that it describes the stacked pixel/logic arrangement.
WO2021117642A1 EBS/TOF/RGB CAMERA FOR SMART SURVEILLANCE AND INTRUDER DETECTION
View attachment 20682
Hi Frederik,I´m not in doubt that Akida is going many places
Have you figured out if the Qualcomm edge AI might be Akida? Because Qualcomm used to work on a neuromorphic chip and gave up on it.
Qualcomm has some new AI that has many similarities with what Akida can do, if it is their own AI, then it´s a threat to Akida, if it´s not, then we´re probably on the winning team being integrated into Qualcomms chips. They used to work on a neuromorphic chip, but decided to work on a software stack instead.Hi Frederik,
Could you point me to the particular haystack you are talking about?
wow this seems to be a thing DioHi Frederik,
Could you point me to the particular haystack you are talking about?
I believe that eventually Qualcomm will embrace AKIDA IP but that is most certainly a belief not a yet provable Fact.I´m not in doubt that Akida is going many places
Have you figured out if the Qualcomm edge AI might be Akida? Because Qualcomm used to work on a neuromorphic chip and gave up on it.