@Carlos Danger I agree with your view. There could be undercurrents that is not obvious to general shareholders.
Two things I was worried about: First is the EGM, but that didn't materialise. Those three guys couldn't garner 5% shouldn't be trivialised. The most important thing is when the shareholders vote and that is when the people inside the trojen horse come out and hit us.
Second thing is the percentage of votes. If you look at the previous voting history, only about 30% of votes were casted. The top 20/50 and the unhappy shareholders are going to vote and they can surely sway the decision. Some of the top 20 appears to be with the BoD, but what happens if their hands get twisted. The mum and dad investors with a happy feeling may not vote at all. I see the shareholder apathy towards voting is the biggest issue.
I will vote and I will also ask my friends to vote, come November. Those three are out to steel my money. And yours.
@Carlos Danger, my respect to you. You always think differently.