BRN Discussion Ongoing

[Newk R]

That's why I stopped inviting all my imaginary friends and alternating ego's.
The typing was getting to be a bitch!

I invited one of my alter egos to my secret meeting. I turned up but I didn't.

 

[Fact Finder]

This one will probably get pulled to pieces.
But why would Chromatic Inc (Hearing Aids) publish a recent patent and reference a Brainchip patent?
https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/11877125
View attachment 54861
View attachment 54862

The management team has been pretty quiet on LinkedIn.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/will...9K?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

And we all hold our breath until Diogenese passes judgment.

My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder

 

[Diogenese]

This one will probably get pulled to pieces.
But why would Chromatic Inc (Hearing Aids) publish a recent patent and reference a Brainchip patent?
https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/11877125
View attachment 54861
View attachment 54862

The management team has been pretty quiet on LinkedIn.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/will...9K?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

All US patents are examined by the USPTO. They have a classification system, a modified version of the International Patent Classification (IPC), into which the old US laissez faire patent classification system is shoe-horned, in which the salient features of the invention are classified.
The patent examiner thus checks the salient features of the new "invention" against other patents with the same classification(s) (usually a patent is classified in more than one class). In addition applicants are required to notify the USPTO of relevant prior art.

So the short answer is that the US patent examiner found the listed patents, or the applicant notified the USPTO of the prior documents. The USPTO is buggerizing around with its database, so I can't find the information which would clear this up.

 

[DingoBorat]

Conclusion​

This project leverages the Brainchip Akida Neuromorphic Hardware Accelerator to propose an innovative solution to home automation. It can be optimized to work as a daily used gadget that may be at everyone's house in the near future.”

Comments such as this from Chris Mendez make me wonder why Sean Hehir said AKD1000's focus was too narrow. Everyone's house is not narrow. Please, Sean...choose your words carefully.

Both Sean's and Antonio's wording, in respect to AKIDA 1.0s market potential, was poor.

They could only have been off the cuff remarks, in my opinion.

Maybe, they should be taken in the context of what BrainChip, as a Company is trying to achieve.

"Making AI Ubiquitous"​

They don't merely want to find a niche for BRNs technology.
They want to dominate, the A.I. market segments, which they are a good fit for.

Maybe their comments, should be seen in this light..

AKIDA 2.0s foundation technology, is AKIDA 1 0.

 

[DingoBorat]

View attachment 54816
Apparently has 118 granted patents. Hopefully nothing that may obstruct us.

Just on that short "About" section, it "looks like" his patents, would revolve around memristive and analog technology, so would possibly be a hindrance to others going down that path, not us..

 

[TheFunkMachine]

Not sure if previously posted

View attachment 54811
View attachment 54812

I wonder if he is talking about VVDN edge box or something completely different ?

 

[Quatrojos]

Both Sean's and Antonio's wording, in respect to AKIDA 1.0s market potential, was poor.

They could only have been off the cuff remarks, in my opinion.

Maybe, they should be taken in the context of what BrainChip, as a Company is trying to achieve.

"Making AI Ubiquitous"​

They don't merely want to find a niche for BRNs technology.
They want to dominate, the A.I. market segments, which they are a good fit for.

Maybe their comments, should be seen in this light..

AKIDA 2.0s foundation technology, is AKIDA 1 0.

I hope they are blinded by AKD1500, Let alone 2000. But they are expected to be flawless in their representation. To criticise their company’s very foundation, even off the cuff, is a crucial blunder…

 

[JDelekto]

Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm certain that Renesas were only an IP licensee and were never technology partners.

I believe you are correct. They were a customer as opposed to a partner.

However, if one goes to the main page on the BrainChip Web site and scrolls down, they will still see the Renesas logo on the right-to-left scrolling marquee:

 

[SharesForBrekky]

Over Xmas @Luppo71 and I held a secret Brainchip meeting and we were the only ones to show up. I was quite disappointed as I was expecting Sean and TD to turn up.

A photo of your secret meeting with Luppo71:

 

[Bravo]

Hi All,

I know a guy whose friend of a friend of a friend worked at OnSemi and he went to a Mercedes dealership and looked at a car…….So not saying there could be a connection to BrainChip……

from WikiCamps

Hi RegBut, I believe they need you over on the Crapper ASAP!!! Apparently they’ve sprung a malodorous leak in their phoofer valve and they need your help to plug it up.

 

[Diogenese]

All US patents are examined by the USPTO. They have a classification system, a modified version of the International Patent Classification (IPC), into which the old US laissez faire patent classification system is shoe-horned, in which the salient features of the invention are classified.
The patent examiner thus checks the salient features of the new "invention" against other patents with the same classification(s) (usually a patent is classified in more than one class). In addition applicants are required to notify the USPTO of relevant prior art.

So the short answer is that the US patent examiner found the listed patents, or the applicant notified the USPTO of the prior documents. The USPTO is buggerizing around with its database, so I can't find the information which would clear this up.

Well I finally ran it to ground, but not in USPTO. Here is the list of prior art cited in the International Search report:

Category Y means that the examiner considers that 2 or more documents combined prepublish the claimed invention. The applicant can contest this conclusion or amend the claims so they have an inventive step above the combined prior documents.

Category A means that the examiner considers them to be relevant background, but do not disclose the claimed invention.

 

[Guzzi62]

Not directly BRN related but interesting nevertheless:

The Four Big Carmakers That'll Soon Adopt Android Automotive.​

Android Auto, Android Automotive, and Google Automotive Services spearhead Google's push in the automotive space.

The Four Big Carmakers That'll Soon Adopt Android Automotive

Google has revealed the next big names to embrace Android Automotive; the list of supported brands will get close to a dozen companies

www.autoevolution.com

 

[Pom down under]

Hi All,

I know a guy whose friend of a friend of a friend worked at OnSemi and he went to a Mercedes dealership and looked at a car…….So not saying there could be a connection to BrainChip……

from WikiCamps

 

[Worker122]

Yep that’s the problem with secret meetings. If you tell people it’s no longer secret but if you don’t tell them they don’t turn up. Personally I quite enjoy my own company so being alone at all my secret meanings has never been an issue.

No problems meeting quorum numbers either FF.

 

[Deena]

That's why I stopped inviting all my imaginary friends and alternating ego's.
The typing was getting to be a bitch!
And none of us could afford a round.

I've got two imaginary friends, but they don't get along.

 

[Pom down under]

I've got two imaginary friends, but they don't get along.

Your lucky I pissed mine off and they both gone back to HC

 

[Fact Finder]

No problems meeting quorum numbers either FF.

No one has ever challenged the minutes so I must be doing something right.

 

[Gemmax]

Much nicer reading the clowns on here than the trolls!

 

[AusEire]

A photo of your secret meeting with Luppo71:

View attachment 54875

We even advertised it

 

[Esq.111]

Morning Chippers ,

Feeling a little .........

Regards,
Esq.