Remark
Top 20
So we'd need litigation funding for a case against our litigation funders? My brain hurts.This would be a breach of ethical standards and open Locke to litigation.
So we'd need litigation funding for a case against our litigation funders? My brain hurts.This would be a breach of ethical standards and open Locke to litigation.
You know, i remember a couple of posters on this forum imploring that we should shut our mouths regards to Locke funding as it just fuels ammunition for our enemies to double down on their efforts to exploit AVZ achilles heel regards to lack of funds, yet here we have AVZ bod illuminating that very fact publicly......
View attachment 64924
I don't believe Manono Lithium has been given the green light to continue disrupting the Manono town without proper approval from the population of Manono and/or the Governor of Tanganyika.....
It doesn't look like Felix gives a toss.
It comes under the win win principle.
Do you think we'll ever get our money back or even make a quidSo we'd need litigation funding for a case against our litigation funders? My brain hurts.
The e-Courts page for the Supreme Court hearings on Monday has been updated this afternoon and I also can’t find any references to our hearing now - other peoples matters being heard in Chambers are still listed.I wonder if your search brings up live material? Both myself and @Mr_Tones83 can no longer find any references to any date for any hearing as of this morning - I could yesterday
I've deliberately stuck it up tolate's left nostril on HC, and I get silence
Thanks for thatHi Team,
My PA went down to the Courts and was advised that the Case was vacated (I dont know what vacated means in this context).
Regards,
SilentOne
Hi Team,
My PA went down to the Courts and was advised that the Case was vacated (I dont know what vacated means in this context).
Regards,
SilentOne
The last time it was rescheduled (from April to June) the reason was also that the case had been vacated. I guess we'll soon find out whether it's pushed back again or dropped for good.Just got off the phone with Wa Courts, case has been vacated and will no longer proceed accordingly to clerk. She wouldn’t divulge why but will help save cash for avz.
Once again, fuck MMGA and our associated detractors
If a case is vacated does that mean theres no judgment on who needs to pay? ie if AVZ won then they most probably would be awarded that Fat tail pay our legals. Is this a sneaky way that Fat Tail wasted our time and money and doesn't have to pay up?Where is Fat Tail? They started the case.
Has Fat Tail vacated, coz they went to Costa Rico?
Is Vacated the same as evaporated?
A judge needs to agree to the case being vacated, so I doubt they would allow this to happen re: racking up huge legal bills for a spurious case that never proceeds. Although I agree that they're out to distract and cause harm to AVZ as a whole.If a case is vacated does that mean theres no judgment on who needs to pay? ie if AVZ won then they most probably would be awarded that Fat tail pay our legals. Is this a sneaky way that Fat Tail wasted our time and money and doesn't have to pay up?
You'd have to think that your last statement is true.. Vacate before judgement is against you and have to cough up... AVZ can always pursue them for mischief or spurious claims of course!If a case is vacated does that mean theres no judgment on who needs to pay? ie if AVZ won then they most probably would be awarded that Fat tail pay our legals. Is this a sneaky way that Fat Tail wasted our time and money and doesn't have to pay up?