Just missing the BrainChip logo somewhere, otherwise I’d be happy running alongside Bravo in themI would like to introduce the all new brainchip sneakers collaborated with Nike … for the upcoming run! Don’t miss the opportunity!
View attachment 75874
Maybe just below BrainChip on the top part of the tongue.Just missing the BrainChip logo somewhere, otherwise I’d be happy running alongside Bravo in them![]()
With 8 unis involved, there could be well above 100 engineers a year emerging with Akida expertise and taking this unique skill to their new employers. The early graduates should be well sought after as the AI snowball gathers momentum.
They are keeping the spikes for the track shoes.Just missing the BrainChip logo somewhere, otherwise I’d be happy running alongside Bravo in them![]()
Here is a presentation from the University of Virginia on a research project using Akida for a project called AGESCOPE an Age-Based Recommendation System. From what I can gather they used Akida to predict the age of people from images and found it to be extremely accurate. About 10 mins long and audio not the best.......
As we are cashed up prior to the LDA raise the very worst case scenario is that they are putting in place a safety net against a recession or AI crash that may be coming??Hi Manny,
The point that you have raised is one I have pondered over as well, let's all be honest, the LDA deal came out of the blue, I quite frankly thought
we had finished with LDA, to close out the last deal, we even bought back the outstanding shares for around 0.03 each (from memory), whilst having access to, 140 Million AUD and to date only having drawn down 68 Million AUD it's obviously been a good avenue to funds, despite the selling off of shares and the dilution of shareholders holdings.
So, in my opinion, we are either going to do a wafer run, which goes against all the business changes that have recently taken place or we are
partnering up with a major player and need to pump in our agreed share ?
A deal involves more than one party, so I don't believe we are going solo, and our Board would have weighed up this recent LDA agreement
and come to the conclusion that whatever is going to be going down over the next few months is worth taking the risk...add to that thought,
Sean has stated some news around the Akida development would be shared over the coming months, so interesting times indeed.
Regards......Tech.
Yes I wanted to but it somehow doesn’t seem to workJust missing the BrainChip logo somewhere, otherwise I’d be happy running alongside Bravo in them![]()
Hi Manny,As we are cashed up prior to the LDA raise the very worst case scenario is that they are putting in place a safety net against a recession or AI crash that may be coming??
Worst case IMO is safety net.
We have circa 15.5% to 16.5% of SOI as inside holders.
They will ensure that BRN will remain 'safe'.
I think the LDA funding is more likely for something like a deal of some sort given that Sean and Tony V gave been madly accumulating within the rules.
This one is also nice … unfortunately again he was not willing to add the logo…Just missing the BrainChip logo somewhere, otherwise I’d be happy running alongside Bravo in them![]()
FredWho was accumulating before Xmas?
Pretty sure Davo was keen.Who was accumulating before Xmas?
Does anyone know if it was retail FOMO or other?Pretty sure Davo was keen.
Think he got a tip from the Flotsey Mules.![]()
Dunno Pom.Does anyone know if it was retail FOMO or other?
Hi Plebby, extract from earlier research on this topic.Hi Manny,
Just hoping you could shed some light on Sean + Tony’s accumulation? Where is that disclosed and what are the rules surrounding share purchase internally?
Cheers
Hi Plebby, extract from earlier research on this topic.
Fact both Sean and ChaIrman Tony V took circa 81% plus of their real pay in equity in 2023. See the Annual report. Likely similar result in 2024.
They do via conversion of RSU's which avoid insider trading regulations. Smart way to incentivize employees and build insider holdings.
Fact both Sean and Tony V are net accumulating and hold enough to put them in the top 50 holders. See recent Director's notices.
Fact. Sean has 6 million RSU's which he can elect to take over time instead of cash pay. If he keeps taking equity instead of cash pay he will end up in the top 20.
Fact 15.5% - to 16.6% of SOI are held by insiders. See Yahoo Finance and Simply WS.
Assumption: Sean, Tony and insiders know a lot more about what is to come with BRN than holders and posters.
On top of the above Insiders hold enough to block any unwelcome takeover offers.
Sean hinted on further positive news to come on a recent podcast. Not sure how big the deals will be. Hopefully Tata sign up some time this year as that could be a profitable overnight deal.
Recent Frontgrade and USAF deals give confidence as does our new partners with our Edge Box.
Connection with RTX a huge defense supplier. Bascom Hunter.........................................All adding up.
Hi Pom,Does anyone know if it was retail FOMO or other?
I don't agree that shares that are issued as part of a remuneration package are isued for free. Just like the cash salary, they are issued for services provided by the recipient. In fact they may be tied to specific performance targets.Hi Manny
I think you are taking a very rose-coloured glasses approach to the way that RSU's work.
Don't quote me on this as I have not looked at the remuneration reports from the latest set of accounts for some time, but Sean's salary is circa gross $400K. On top of this, Sean is eligible to receive performance shares which are issued on meeting KPI's.
We are not provided information surrounding the KPI's that need to be met. Some KPI's might be walk ups such as 'attend all 12 monthly meetings', others will be 'expand ecosystem by x% or 'generate net sales of $500m'.
Some KPI's will be met, some will not. The restricted shares are issued upfront and then ordinary shares are awarded upon KPI's being met, or cancelled at the conclusion of the KPI period set by the board.
You've previously posted the narrative that Sean is accumulating because he is selling 'some' of his shares to cover tax obligations, but not all of them.
Sean's shares are issued to him for FREE. $0. Nothing. He then has to pay tax on the discount (full value of the shares at date of issue). I therefore understand why directors then sell some of those shares to fund their tax obligations.
It is a big reach to then argue Sean is accumulating because his shareholdings have increased.
Sean has no skin in the game with respect to the performance share's he's issued. He isn't buying $50K shares on market like we would have to. He has received them for FREE. He then sells $10K worth of shares to cover an upcoming $10K tax liability in relation to those shares. Ergo, Sean has FREE-CARRIED $40K worth of shares. With tax having been paid by share sales, he's literally out of pocket $0 for the remaining shares.
If he received $50K worth of shares for FREE and then paid the corresponding tax liability from his own cash, it would be fair to argue that he has $10K skin in the game. This simply is not the case. Sean and the other directors always sell shares to cover the tax liability.
As far as I'm aware, Pia is the only director to have purchased shares on market in the last few years.
All of the above aside, we want to attract top talent and it would be fair to say that US based CEO's of tech company's would receive significantly more than $400K for their role, so I do understand the need to include performance shares in the overall salary package. This works well for shareholders as the directors have a long term incentive to increase the value of the company and therefore shareholders capital.
The one painful point for people like Sean is that shareholders tend to jump on them when they sell shares to cover tax, however, there's no announcement when a director chooses not to sell shares and personally wears the tax, leaving the decision a thankless one.