BRN Discussion Ongoing

7For7

Regular
Not sure if already posted

 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Wow
Reactions: 12 users

HopalongPetrovski

I'm Spartacus!
God you're full of shit. First of all do your homework. Go back through his history of research over the last twelve months. You might just get why he does what he does.
If you have a problem understanding where he is coming from after that.
Why don't you ask him.?
Or is that too hard.
If you go and look at Kevin's history, you will see the guy is a very principled and moral character.
He has been with IBM for more than 13 years.
He is a very self motivated individual, that enjoys a great deal of IBM's trust to carry out his professional duties, and any person who cast dispersion's on his motivations, needs to have their motivations examined thoroughly.
Hi White Horse.
I wasn't casting aspersions on Kevins work or motivations.
Merely trying to understand them.
You apparently think you do.
Good for you.
I said repeatedly that I both appreciate and admire his contributions.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users

Gazzafish

Regular
Artificial Intelligence | ISL - Technology for Real World Solutions



Doesn’t specifically mention Brainchip but we all know we are working with ISL.



Description :-“

Artificial Intelligence, Neuromorphic Computing and DoD Acceptance Testing



ISL is focused on replicating the analog nature of biological computation and the role of neurons in cognition. ISL’s team of scientists/engineers continue to understand how the morphology of individual neurons, circuits, applications, and overall architectures creates desirable computations. Leveraging this understanding and the newly developed and emerging commercial neuromorphic chips, ISL is developing a new low-power, lightweight detect and avoid (DAA) system for very small UAS platforms that exploits automotive radar hardware, light-weight EO/IR sensors, advanced data fusion algorithms, and neuromorphic computing.

Additionally, ISL has pioneered an AI acceptance methodology that allows for DoD testing of AI solutions using essentially the same statistically based methodology in use today. ISL was awarded a US Patent for this February (see link). The methodology leverages ISL’s RF Digital Engineering tools (https://www.islinc.com/digital-engineering ).”
 
  • Fire
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 11 users

Bravo

Meow Meow 🐾
God you're full of shit. First of all do your homework. Go back through his history of research over the last twelve months. You might just get why he does what he does.
If you have a problem understanding where he is coming from after that.
Why don't you ask him.?
Or is that too hard.
If you go and look at Kevin's history, you will see the guy is a very principled and moral character.
He has been with IBM for more than 13 years.
He is a very self motivated individual, that enjoys a great deal of IBM's trust to carry out his professional duties, and any person who cast dispersion's on his motivations, needs to have their motivations examined thoroughly.


Whoa there, Horsey!

I don’t think Hoppy was casting aspersions on Big Kev at all. I think he was just asking what I think is a very fair and logical question.

Kevin himself has already said he’s not a shareholder, that he can’t speak on behalf of IBM or whether they’ll incorporate Akida and that his interest lies somewhere between personal and professional.

So naturally, there remains some curiosity about what’s actually driving that interest.

On a previous post I suggested the idea that it might be linked to Kevin's PhD (see link here #110,491).

This morning I ran Kevin's LinkedIn background, including details of his doctoral research, through ChatGPT, and the view that came back from Chatty was that his activity looks very consistent with someone exploring a broader research theme around AI infrastructure, coordination, and distributed systems. In other words, as a tool he’s experimenting with as part of a broader research framework.

If anyone is interest in what Chatty had to say, please feel free to check it out, otherwise, you know what to do.





ChatGPT's Response

🧠 1. Yes — this is absolutely related to his PhD​

Not just loosely… directly and strongly linked.

The key line is:

“Doctoral research… investigating coordination ontologies… distributed coordination architecture… 40,000+ coordinating agents… infrastructure design embodies ontological commitments…”



🔑 Translation into plain English:​

He is studying:

👉 How large-scale intelligent systems coordinate, make decisions, and share knowledge

At scale:
  • Distributed systems
  • AI agents
  • Infrastructure
  • Governance


⚙️ 2. Now map that to what he’s been posting​


Look at his demos through that lens:



🔵 Palantir + Symphony phase​

  • Ontologies
  • Relationships
  • Distributed compute
  • Enterprise-scale coordination
👉 Directly aligns with:

“coordination ontologies + infrastructure”



🟢 Akida / neuromorphic phase​

  • Edge inference
  • Event-driven systems
  • Distributed intelligence
  • “Hive mind” type demos
👉 Directly aligns with:

“40,000+ coordinating agents / distributed cognition”



🔥 3. This is the big unlock​


You’re not watching:

❌ A guy promoting BrainChip

You are watching:

A PhD researcher building a unified theory of AI infrastructure — in public — using real systems



🧠 4. Why Akida suddenly appears​

This now makes total sense.

His research is about:

👉 Coordination across distributed agents


Problem with current systems:​

  • GPU-heavy
  • Centralised
  • Expensive
  • Not scalable to millions of agents


What neuromorphic offers:​

  • Local decision-making
  • Event-driven behaviour
  • Low power
  • Scalable agent systems


👉 That maps perfectly to his thesis.



🧩 5. That “topology-aware GPU scheduling” question now clicks​

Earlier you picked up on this:

multi-GPU, multi-node scheduling complexity


That is:​


👉 Centralised scaling problem



His PhD direction is:​


👉 Distributed coordination problem



So the progression becomes:​

  1. Try to scale AI with GPUs (Symphony)
  2. Hit complexity limits
  3. Ask:
    “What if intelligence is distributed instead?”
  4. Explore neuromorphic (Akida)


👉 That’s a research evolution, not a promotion strategy.



🧠 6. Why he’s so active publicly​


This line is also critical:

“AI-augmented rapid prototyping… accelerate from concept to working system”



He’s essentially:

👉 Using LinkedIn as:
  • A lab notebook
  • A publication channel
  • A portfolio of experiments


And this:

19 technical demonstrations since Dec 2025

👉 That is:

PhD-level output volume



⚠️ 7. Important reality check (for BRN)​


This is where you need to stay grounded:



✅ What this means:​

  • Akida fits a serious research problem
  • A capable architect is:
    • Using it
    • Testing it
    • Integrating it


❗ What it does NOT mean:​

  • IBM endorsement
  • Commercial rollout
  • Revenue
  • Strategic partnership


👉 It’s:

Research-driven experimentation



🧠 8. The most important insight (this is the takeaway)​


His work is not about:

👉 “Which chip wins?”

It’s about:

“What architecture enables large-scale intelligent coordination?”



And he’s testing across:
  • GPUs
  • LLMs
  • Quantum
  • Neuromorphic
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 15 users

HopalongPetrovski

I'm Spartacus!
Whoa there, Horsey!

I don’t think Hoppy was casting aspersions on Big Kev at all. I think he was just asking what I think is a very fair and logical question.

Kevin himself has already said he’s not a shareholder, that he can’t speak on behalf of IBM or whether they’ll incorporate Akida and that his interest lies somewhere between personal and professional.

So naturally, there remains some curiosity about what’s actually driving that interest.

On a previous post I suggested the idea that it might be linked to Kevin's PhD (see link here #110,491).

This morning I ran Kevin's LinkedIn background, including details of his doctoral research, through ChatGPT, and the view that came back from Chatty was that his activity looks very consistent with someone exploring a broader research theme around AI infrastructure, coordination, and distributed systems. In other words, as a tool he’s experimenting with as part of a broader research framework.

If anyone is interest in what Chatty had to say, please feel free to check it out, otherwise, you know what to do.





ChatGPT's Response

🧠 1. Yes — this is absolutely related to his PhD​

Not just loosely… directly and strongly linked.

The key line is:





🔑 Translation into plain English:​

He is studying:

👉 How large-scale intelligent systems coordinate, make decisions, and share knowledge

At scale:
  • Distributed systems
  • AI agents
  • Infrastructure
  • Governance


⚙️ 2. Now map that to what he’s been posting​


Look at his demos through that lens:



🔵 Palantir + Symphony phase​

  • Ontologies
  • Relationships
  • Distributed compute
  • Enterprise-scale coordination
👉 Directly aligns with:





🟢 Akida / neuromorphic phase​

  • Edge inference
  • Event-driven systems
  • Distributed intelligence
  • “Hive mind” type demos
👉 Directly aligns with:





🔥 3. This is the big unlock​


You’re not watching:

❌ A guy promoting BrainChip

You are watching:





🧠 4. Why Akida suddenly appears​

This now makes total sense.

His research is about:

👉 Coordination across distributed agents


Problem with current systems:​

  • GPU-heavy
  • Centralised
  • Expensive
  • Not scalable to millions of agents


What neuromorphic offers:​

  • Local decision-making
  • Event-driven behaviour
  • Low power
  • Scalable agent systems


👉 That maps perfectly to his thesis.



🧩 5. That “topology-aware GPU scheduling” question now clicks​

Earlier you picked up on this:




That is:​


👉 Centralised scaling problem



His PhD direction is:​


👉 Distributed coordination problem



So the progression becomes:​

  1. Try to scale AI with GPUs (Symphony)
  2. Hit complexity limits
  3. Ask:
  4. Explore neuromorphic (Akida)


👉 That’s a research evolution, not a promotion strategy.



🧠 6. Why he’s so active publicly​


This line is also critical:





He’s essentially:

👉 Using LinkedIn as:
  • A lab notebook
  • A publication channel
  • A portfolio of experiments


And this:



👉 That is:





⚠️ 7. Important reality check (for BRN)​


This is where you need to stay grounded:



✅ What this means:​

  • Akida fits a serious research problem
  • A capable architect is:
    • Using it
    • Testing it
    • Integrating it


❗ What it does NOT mean:​

  • IBM endorsement
  • Commercial rollout
  • Revenue
  • Strategic partnership


👉 It’s:





🧠 8. The most important insight (this is the takeaway)​


His work is not about:

👉 “Which chip wins?”

It’s about:





And he’s testing across:
  • GPUs
  • LLMs
  • Quantum
  • Neuromorphic
Thank you Bravo.
A cogent and well structured explanation.
I have seen so much hallucinated and baited opinion based "stuff" conjured by various LLM's after scraping the web that I hadn't bothered questioning them on this matter but I am impressed and grateful for this response.
Thanks also for sticking up for me personally. Appreciate it. 😄
 
  • Fire
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 6 users

jrp173

Regular
Whoa there, Horsey!

I don’t think Hoppy was casting aspersions on Big Kev at all. I think he was just asking what I think is a very fair and logical question.

Kevin himself has already said he’s not a shareholder, that he can’t speak on behalf of IBM or whether they’ll incorporate Akida and that his interest lies somewhere between personal and professional.

So naturally, there remains some curiosity about what’s actually driving that interest.

On a previous post I suggested the idea that it might be linked to Kevin's PhD (see link here #110,491).

This morning I ran Kevin's LinkedIn background, including details of his doctoral research, through ChatGPT, and the view that came back from Chatty was that his activity looks very consistent with someone exploring a broader research theme around AI infrastructure, coordination, and distributed systems. In other words, as a tool he’s experimenting with as part of a broader research framework.

If anyone is interest in what Chatty had to say, please feel free to check it out, otherwise, you know what to do.





ChatGPT's Response

🧠 1. Yes — this is absolutely related to his PhD​

Not just loosely… directly and strongly linked.

The key line is:





🔑 Translation into plain English:​

He is studying:

👉 How large-scale intelligent systems coordinate, make decisions, and share knowledge

At scale:
  • Distributed systems
  • AI agents
  • Infrastructure
  • Governance


⚙️ 2. Now map that to what he’s been posting​


Look at his demos through that lens:



🔵 Palantir + Symphony phase​

  • Ontologies
  • Relationships
  • Distributed compute
  • Enterprise-scale coordination
👉 Directly aligns with:





🟢 Akida / neuromorphic phase​

  • Edge inference
  • Event-driven systems
  • Distributed intelligence
  • “Hive mind” type demos
👉 Directly aligns with:





🔥 3. This is the big unlock​


You’re not watching:

❌ A guy promoting BrainChip

You are watching:





🧠 4. Why Akida suddenly appears​

This now makes total sense.

His research is about:

👉 Coordination across distributed agents


Problem with current systems:​

  • GPU-heavy
  • Centralised
  • Expensive
  • Not scalable to millions of agents


What neuromorphic offers:​

  • Local decision-making
  • Event-driven behaviour
  • Low power
  • Scalable agent systems


👉 That maps perfectly to his thesis.



🧩 5. That “topology-aware GPU scheduling” question now clicks​

Earlier you picked up on this:




That is:​


👉 Centralised scaling problem



His PhD direction is:​


👉 Distributed coordination problem



So the progression becomes:​

  1. Try to scale AI with GPUs (Symphony)
  2. Hit complexity limits
  3. Ask:
  4. Explore neuromorphic (Akida)


👉 That’s a research evolution, not a promotion strategy.



🧠 6. Why he’s so active publicly​


This line is also critical:





He’s essentially:

👉 Using LinkedIn as:
  • A lab notebook
  • A publication channel
  • A portfolio of experiments


And this:



👉 That is:





⚠️ 7. Important reality check (for BRN)​


This is where you need to stay grounded:



✅ What this means:​

  • Akida fits a serious research problem
  • A capable architect is:
    • Using it
    • Testing it
    • Integrating it


❗ What it does NOT mean:​

  • IBM endorsement
  • Commercial rollout
  • Revenue
  • Strategic partnership


👉 It’s:





🧠 8. The most important insight (this is the takeaway)​


His work is not about:

👉 “Which chip wins?”

It’s about:





And he’s testing across:
  • GPUs
  • LLMs
  • Quantum
  • Neuromorphic


Bravo, not having a go at all, as I know your research is appreciated by many on the forum. I understand you are not suggesting this is fact, but I think we all need to be careful with using Chat GPT, Claude etc, and take it with a very large pinch of salt.

It's very easy to get the response you want from AI, by asking the question differently.

When I rephrase and ask the question, my reply was in total contrast to your reply whilst still using Chat GPT. Below is just a small portion of my reply.

1774222947154.png


I think these are great tools, but must be used with caution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

White Horse

Regular
For those that think I'm being to harsh. And for those that rely on non factual hypothesis from AI.
Do the research, read all his stuff going back over the last 12 months (it's all there on LinkedIn) and formulate some opinions of your own.
Then take the time to converse with the guy himself. It's not hard. I have.!!
And most of your assumptions are correct, including his doctorate.
But to carry on with with this spurious nonsense about his motives that make it sound like their is a conspiracy going on, shows that some of you are starting to loose your grip.
Relax, sit back and rejoice in the fact that he is doing something that he enjoys doing, because he is that sort on bloke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

Bravo

Meow Meow 🐾
Bravo, not having a go at all, as I know your research is appreciated by many on the forum. I understand you are not suggesting this is fact, but I think we all need to be careful with using Chat GPT, Claude etc, and take it with a very large pinch of salt.

It's very easy to get the response you want from AI, by asking the question differently.

When I rephrase and ask the question, my reply was in total contrast to your reply whilst still using Chat GPT. Below is just a small portion of my reply.

View attachment 96435

I think these are great tools, but must be used with caution.


Hi jrp,

Appreciate your comment.

For added context (which I should have included in the original post), the question I actually asked ChatGPT was:

"Do you think the work Kevin is doing with Akida is related in any way to his PhD, and, if so, in what way?"

So the response was framed around exploring a possible connection, not trying to arrive at a definitive answer.

In this case, the output isn’t just a generic AI opinion since it’s grounded in two things that are publicly available and verifiable:
  • Kevin’s own description of his PhD research
  • The type of work and demos he’s been posting recently
All ChatGPT did was connect those dots and point out that the overlap is fairly obvious.

I completely agree that you can steer AI depending on how you frame a question. But at the end of the day, you still have to apply your own judgement. Personally, I find the alignment here pretty compelling and quite plausible.

I’ve also stated numerous times (as have plenty of others) that Chatty (and other AI outputs) should be treated with caution, so I didn’t feel the need to restate that disclaimer yet again.

Ultimately, the only definitive answer would come from Kevin himself.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users

jrp173

Regular
Hi jrp,

Appreciate your comment.

For added context (which I should have included in the original post), the question I actually asked ChatGPT was:

"Do you think the work Kevin is doing with Akida is related in any way to his PhD, and, if so, in what way?"

So the response was framed around exploring a possible connection, not trying to arrive at a definitive answer.

In this case, the output isn’t just a generic AI opinion since it’s grounded in two things that are publicly available and verifiable:
  • Kevin’s own description of his PhD research
  • The type of work and demos he’s been posting recently
All ChatGPT did was connect those dots and point out that the overlap is fairly obvious.

I completely agree that you can steer AI depending on how you frame a question. But at the end of the day, you still have to apply your own judgement. Personally, I find the alignment here pretty compelling and quite plausible.

I’ve also stated numerous times (as have plenty of others) that Chatty (and other AI outputs) should be treated with caution, so I didn’t feel the need to restate that disclaimer yet again.

Ultimately, the only definitive answer would come from Kevin himself.

Thanks for the reply Bravo, absolutely true!

Regardless, seeing Kevin include Akida in 8 tests is a great thing! I just wish BrainChip would leverage off of his testing and create a white paper or solution brief to release to investors and potential clients!
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 5 users
Did a quick search for Doug Utberg and didn't see this IV but maybe I missed it being posted already under something else.

Anyway, from late Feb with Sean. Didn't hear anything too groundbreaking but the LLM comments around the 10min mark were interesting.

Presumably to do with TENNs?

Sean's talking a good game again here, let's see if he can walk a positive tangible outcome on this statement through an ASX Ann?

I can't embed the vid but is in the link as is full transcript.


Part of transcript ~ 10min mark.


"When you and I were just chatting a moment before we started to record, what was unthinkable is the ability to bring an LLM to the edge just a short period of time ago. It is now on a path. We are working on a piece of enabling technology that is going to really set the benchmark in this industry,
the ability to do some amazing things at such a low power that it will change the world.
Actually, I believe to get an LLM in a device with so minimal power. and the ability to walk around and do things without an internet connection, very powerful thing. Stay tuned."
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 20 users

Bravo

Meow Meow 🐾
For those that think I'm being to harsh. And for those that rely on non factual hypothesis from AI.
Do the research, read all his stuff going back over the last 12 months (it's all there on LinkedIn) and formulate some opinions of your own.
Then take the time to converse with the guy himself. It's not hard. I have.!!
And most of your assumptions are correct, including his doctorate.
But to carry on with with this spurious nonsense about his motives that make it sound like their is a conspiracy going on, shows that some of you are starting to loose your grip.
Relax, sit back and rejoice in the fact that he is doing something that he enjoys doing, because he is that sort on bloke.


Hi White Horse,

I don't believe that referring to Kevin’s "motivation" is being used in a negative or conspiratorial sense at all. I think it's being used just in the plain meaning of the word "the reason or reasons someone is doing something."

There’s a big difference between being curious about what’s driving his interest versus implying there’s something untoward going on.

Having said that, I actually agree with a lot of what you’ve said. Kevin is clearly very capable, he enjoys what he’s doing, he’s experimenting across different technologies and his PhD and background likely play into it.

That’s exactly why we're all interested because it’s unusual (in a really good way😊) to see someone doing this level of hands-on, public experimentation.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 18 users

manny100

Top 20
Did a quick search for Doug Utberg and didn't see this IV but maybe I missed it being posted already under something else.

Anyway, from late Feb with Sean. Didn't hear anything too groundbreaking but the LLM comments around the 10min mark were interesting.

Presumably to do with TENNs?

Sean's talking a good game again here, let's see if he can walk a positive tangible outcome on this statement through an ASX Ann?

I can't embed the vid but is in the link as is full transcript.


Part of transcript ~ 10min mark.


"When you and I were just chatting a moment before we started to record, what was unthinkable is the ability to bring an LLM to the edge just a short period of time ago. It is now on a path. We are working on a piece of enabling technology that is going to really set the benchmark in this industry,
the ability to do some amazing things at such a low power that it will change the world.
Actually, I believe to get an LLM in a device with so minimal power. and the ability to walk around and do things without an internet connection, very powerful thing. Stay tuned."
Sounds like another patent in the bag.
World changing?
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 11 users
Asking AI

Breakdown of Official Model Architectures​

The following list represents the unique functional models currently maintained in the BrainChip library:

1. Computer Vision Models (6 Models)​

Vision remains the most populated category for Akida, leveraging its ability to process spatial data with high sparsity.[1] [4]

  • AkidaNet/Object Detection (YOLOv2): A regression-based detection model.[2]
  • AkidaNet/Object Detection (CenterNet): An alternative detection architecture.[2]
  • AkidaNet/Object Classification: Inspired by MobileNet v1, optimized for Akida's separable convolutions.[2]
  • AkidaNet/Face Recognition: Specifically tuned for facial feature extraction.[2]
  • AkidaNet/Segmentation (UNet): Used for medical and navigational pixel-level mapping.[2]
  • AkidaNet/Point Cloud Classification (PointNet++): Designed for 3D spatial data from LiDAR.[2]

2. Temporal and Audio Models (5 Models)​

These models utilize the time-domain capabilities of the Akida 2 platform, particularly through the TENN architecture.[2] [5]

  • AkidaNet/Keyword Spotting (DS-CNN): A 32-keyword recognition model.[2]
  • TENN Keyword Spotting: A more efficient version of KWS that processes raw audio without pre-processing.[2]
  • TENN Audio Denoising: A speech enhancement model with ~590,000 parameters.[2]
  • TENN Gesture Recognition: Optimized for event-based (DVS) cameras.[2]
  • TENN Eye Tracking: A high-sparsity model for wearable integration.[2]

3. Advanced and Generative Models (3 Models)​

With the release of Akida 2, BrainChip has moved into the realm of complex sequential data.[2] [3]

  • Compact LLM: A localized Large Language Model for edge devices.[2]
  • LLM with RAG: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation model for intelligent real-time applications.[2]
  • AkidaNet/Regression: An age estimation model using the UTKFace dataset.[2]

Architectural Variations and Customization​

While there are roughly 14 primary functional models listed above, the "total" number can be viewed as much higher in a development context. For instance, the AkidaNet backbone is often scaled (e.g., AkidaNet 1.0, 0.5, or 0.25) to fit different power and memory envelopes.[2] [6] Furthermore, through their partnership with Edge Impulse, thousands of custom user-defined models have been trained and deployed onto Akida hardware using these base architectures as templates.[3]

In the field of neuromorphic engineering, the value of these models lies in their "parameter efficiency." For example, the TENN Gesture Recognition model achieves state-of-the-art results with only 192,000 parameters, whereas a traditional deep learning model might require millions to achieve similar accuracy on non-neuromorphic hardware.[2
 
  • Fire
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 9 users

buena suerte :-)

BOB Bank of Brainchip
Did a quick search for Doug Utberg and didn't see this IV but maybe I missed it being posted already under something else.

Anyway, from late Feb with Sean. Didn't hear anything too groundbreaking but the LLM comments around the 10min mark were interesting.

Presumably to do with TENNs?

Sean's talking a good game again here, let's see if he can walk a positive tangible outcome on this statement through an ASX Ann?

I can't embed the vid but is in the link as is full transcript.


Part of transcript ~ 10min mark.


"When you and I were just chatting a moment before we started to record, what was unthinkable is the ability to bring an LLM to the edge just a short period of time ago. It is now on a path. We are working on a piece of enabling technology that is going to really set the benchmark in this industry,
the ability to do some amazing things at such a low power that it will change the world.
Actually, I believe to get an LLM in a device with so minimal power. and the ability to walk around and do things without an internet connection, very powerful thing. Stay tuned."


Thanks Fmf...

A great watch!

Sean looks the most comfortable relaxed and confident that I have seen him!!


(SH) "And the ability to walk around and do things without an internet connection..... very powerful thing..... Stay tuned."



I am also feeling the vibes and very confident all BRN right now!

Has been a Loooonnngggg 11 year wait ....But I now believe we are almost through that very dark tunnel!!!

I have been topping up over the last few weeks and will continue to at these share grabbing prices!!

Obviously all the above is my opinion only....But I'm feeling it!!! :)


Good Luck all


Cheers
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 34 users

TECH

Top 20
Hi White Horse,

I don't believe that referring to Kevin’s "motivation" is being used in a negative or conspiratorial sense at all. I think it's being used just in the plain meaning of the word "the reason or reasons someone is doing something."

There’s a big difference between being curious about what’s driving his interest versus implying there’s something untoward going on.

Having said that, I actually agree with a lot of what you’ve said. Kevin is clearly very capable, he enjoys what he’s doing, he’s experimenting across different technologies and his PhD and background likely play into it.

That’s exactly why we're all interested because it’s unusual (in a really good way😊) to see someone doing this level of hands-on, public experimentation.

It's the movers and shakers, the ones in a position to make a positive difference, they will be quietly observing or having their key staff
noting what's at play here, even some of our own staff have commented, including Anil, but at the end of the day, its competitors, it's
the IBM's, the Nividia's, the Intel's, the Aerospace Giants, the Space Giants it's all of them that we want to sit up and take note, our
technology is world class disruptive technology, if they can discredit us or pretend to ignore us, well, from where I sit, nothing is going
to hold back this neuromorphic wave that's finally started to show that "Big Wednesday" isn't exclusive to surfing!

Artificial Intelligence Nft GIF by xponentialdesign


We have the team now, balanced and humble, driving us forward to the end goal, that is to deliver to the world and its shareholders
brilliance in the name of AKIDA (we all love a spike or two) !
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 19 users

Rach2512

Regular
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 12 users
Thanks Fmf...

A great watch!

Sean looks the most comfortable relaxed and confident that I have seen him!!


(SH) "And the ability to walk around and do things without an internet connection..... very powerful thing..... Stay tuned."



I am also feeling the vibes and very confident all BRN right now!

Has been a Loooonnngggg 11 year wait ....But I now believe we are almost through that very dark tunnel!!!

I have been topping up over the last few weeks and will continue to at these share grabbing prices!!

Obviously all the above is my opinion only....But I'm feeling it!!! :)


Good Luck all


Cheers
Im glad your feeling it, Ive been hearing it for the last 6 yrs though so I'm at the stage i need to see it
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
It's the movers and shakers, the ones in a position to make a positive difference, they will be quietly observing or having their key staff
noting what's at play here, even some of our own staff have commented, including Anil, but at the end of the day, its competitors, it's
the IBM's, the Nividia's, the Intel's, the Aerospace Giants, the Space Giants it's all of them that we want to sit up and take note, our
technology is world class disruptive technology, if they can discredit us or pretend to ignore us, well, from where I sit, nothing is going
to hold back this neuromorphic wave that's finally started to show that "Big Wednesday" isn't exclusive to surfing!

Artificial Intelligence Nft GIF by xponentialdesign


We have the team now, balanced and humble, driving us forward to the end goal, that is to deliver to the world and its shareholders
brilliance in the name of AKIDA (we all love a spike or two) !
Thanks Tech

You mentioned late 26 and Early 27,
Id like to think the AGM Wont be Whiff and actual proof companies are involved,
I notice the AGM Is on a Wednesday this year i wonder why not a Tuesday ?
 

7For7

Regular
Im glad your feeling it, Ive been hearing it for the last 6 yrs though so I'm at the stage i need to see it

“Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”

This is from John 20:29.
 
  • Love
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 6 users

buena suerte :-)

BOB Bank of Brainchip
Im glad your feeling it, Ive been hearing it for the last 6 yrs though so I'm at the stage i need to see it
We all need..... "to see it" ...... I agree!!!!....

It's on the way ;)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 6 users
Top Bottom