thegh0stwithin
Regular
I had a read, but still could not make out a lot. This is different than the contract excerpts which I saw.
Did you gain any sense from this?
The MoM was hoping Nigel would fold after her raise. Instead he has gone all in. The MoM can't afford to see the river imo
I mentioned a similar scenario like this a couple of times before, simply as a means of breaking the deadlock and getting Manono into construction / production ASAP.There is also the possibility of compromise.
Zijin pay appropriate value for the 15% .
MOM and MOP continue with their positions and Felix continues to focus on his re election .
Dathcom remain 51% majority owner of all of the tenement and
24% to CATH.
No need for ICC if the above agreed ???
I've consistently said we should be trading since I started posting here.I've consistently said we should be trading since I started posting here. But this situation is a good reminder never to invest / bet more than you can afford to lose.
My initial capital exposure here is a touch over 15k. Won't change my life in the slightest if I don't get it back. However if Nigel wins the hand I'll probably never have to work again.
I've also consistently said that I understand why management put us in suspension and support them in their fight to retain our rights. But we have traded in this exact same position before and the share price was sub 0.20 for a long time. At the end of the day I just don't see what information isn't available to the market at this point.I've consistently said we should be trading since I started posting here.
AVZ would be sub 20c if that was the case.............all lithium stocks have been hammered with lithium spot price now down 65% from the ATH, so add that to the mix with corrupt DRC / china trying to steal from us........
View attachment 34088
Pretty obvious why management has kept us in suspension, if trading the share price dives and Zijin goes on a shopping spree ensuring they have a bigger stake over Manono.I've also consistently said that I understand why management put us in suspension and support them in their fight to retain our rights. But we have traded in this exact same position before and the share price was sub 0.20 for a long time. At the end of the day I just don't see what information isn't available to the market at this point.
Yeah like I said I understand why. But looking at it objectively I don't think it stacks up by the rules. Obviously the ASX is happy with the suspension so what I think doesn't matter hahaPretty obvious why management has kept us in suspension, if trading the share price dives and Zijin goes on a shopping spree ensuring they have a bigger stake over Manono.
Not a great look with ASX taking control of the suspension.Announcement
ASX Aware Letter - CMC Markets Invest Alert.
Continuation of Suspension from Quotation - CMC Markets Invest Alert.
This is it....Not a great look with ASX taking control of the suspension.
Although not a surprise when we had 1 week to reply, and took two months.
(and then advised we aren't fully complying with a rule)
I understand its all cloaks and daggers at the moment with all that's going on.
But I don't expect the ASX to be as accommodating.
Push the price down to 5c then go private.Pretty obvious why management has kept us in suspension, if trading the share price dives and Zijin goes on a shopping spree ensuring they have a bigger stake over Manono.
My, very outside, hope is that geopolitical forces are at play here and ASX are onside.Can anyone break down what this actually means?
"AVZ’s securities will now continue to be suspended from quotation under Listing Rule 17.3.1, due to AVZ’s inability to
confirm compliance with Listing Rule 3.1"
"AVZ’s securities are likely to remain suspended until ASX is satisfied about AVZ’s compliance with the Listing
Rules, including Listing Rule 3.1."
3.1 = May 14 2021 Letter.
Is this all bad for us?
Or is it just like, we are still suspended but for a different reason than before?
Could it just be that ASX had no legal recourse to keep AVZ suspended, so now they have a new reason?