Put on my specs and can now see closely what you wrote:Credible sauce indeed
If you actually read the article and read my post, you'll see the article is quoting the "economy" and I've quoted the "stock market" in specific.
Two neurons that spike in the brain and you'll see those two are different.
Connected? Yes.
Different? Absolutely.
Should've gone to SpecSavers![]()
Russian "invasion" isn't why people aren't investing in stocks. (USA has been conquering and destroying/bombing nations for decades, stock markets have done fine).
Versus what the OECD is saying:
āHowever, the improvement in the outlook is still fragile and downside risks predominate as high uncertainty generated by the war could take a heavy toll on activity.ā
You seem to questioning the credibility of the OECD. Do you know who they are and what they do?
To be honest I would have let your original post slide but I felt that it was an unfair attack on a forum member aimed at embarrassing him. I thought it was quite passively aggressive but perhaps thatās just me.
I also see that under your stock disclosure that you have appointed yourself as a proponent of the say no brigade. How is that campaign working out for you?