Agreed, if it's looking like that route, lets sell this bitch and move on - can't wait til the AGM, hope they're held accountable
I really wonder how the AGM will play out. I can't see it being all that informative unless the commercial deadlock has been broken, court cases resolved, and ML awarded beforehand.
Current status and next steps:
If the company is under threat from "internal" conspirators (MMGA and collaborators) presumably those parties will be represented within the attendees (rats in the ranks). Given that, I would imagine that the BOD will be loathe to say anything for risk of revealing strategy to the enemy (same logic as the voluntary suspension and comms blackout).
Dealings with DRC Government:
As above, they won't divulge details. We'll just get "very advanced discussions".
Legal proceedings:
They won't be able to say anything more than what's available on ICC and ICSID sites.
Remuneration/bonuses:
Do BODs at any AGM really provide any meaningful response to shareholders' questions on such topics? My mind goes back to the one of the previous AVZ AGMs where this came up, and Nigel handballed the question to Hjulich, who gave some kind of non-answer. They all had disdainful /dismissive expressions on their faces. Will it really be any different this time (apart from H providing the answer

).
This isn't meant to be a whinge or criticism, just my thoughts on what can realistically be expected to happen at the AGM, in the interests of managing further psychological damage due to repeated deflation of great expectations.