Afternoon ILovelamp ,Well this is interesting.........
![]()
Qualcomm announces first-ever mass-market RISC-V Android SoC
Qualcomm and Google project will enable more RISC-V Android devices in the future.arstechnica.com
Speaking of Turds and Irish poets, another wannabe Irishman once said:Richard the Turd.
(Pardon my Irish accent).
Further...And the enormous amount of work done globally to capture huge data bases wont go to waste either.
Companies with these collections can utilize them.
This from the presentation Slade offered
View attachment 47355
You may be right there. I don't have an agenda, to be frank.The current shorted percentage of borrowed shares is 5.94% as of the 12th of October.
This is the percentage of shares that need to be covered.
Hence why it is called the "percentage shorted".
You're smarter than the Bullshit that you've been pedaling, so what's your game Schnitzel Lover?
The other issue is that with a closing price around 29c on the 15th Sep, and a price on Oct 12th of 18.5c, there were similarly about 5.9% of shares shorted, yet the valuation is 35% less, so it could also seem that something else other than short selling is at hand here to depress BRNs market val.The current shorted percentage of borrowed shares is 5.94% as of the 12th of October.
This is the percentage of shares that need to be covered.
Hence why it is called the "percentage shorted".
You're smarter than the Bullshit that you've been pedaling, so what's your game Schnitzel Lover?
Shorting is of course only one tool of market manipulation.The other issue is that with a closing price around 29c on the 15th Sep, and a price on Oct 12th of 18.5c, there were similarly about 5.9% of shares shorted, yet the valuation is 35% less, so it could also seem that something else other than short selling is at hand here to depress BRNs market val.
IMO ... Schnitzel lover as you stated ... "that something else other than short selling is at hand here to depress BRNs market val."The other issue is that with a closing price around 29c on the 15th Sep, and a price on Oct 12th of 18.5c, there were similarly about 5.9% of shares shorted, yet the valuation is 35% less, so it could also seem that something else other than short selling is at hand here to depress BRNs market val.
"As since Ive looked into it and it seems as if what you're saying is correct"You may be right there. I don't have an agenda, to be frank.
Before I went with that comment, I ran it through with a professional trader asking that specific question..
I can only assume now that my question was interpreted differently from my intention.
As since Ive looked into it and it seems as if what you're saying is correct.
Probably sweet FA in 4C as nothing coming from our BOD’s.IMO ... Schnitzel lover as you stated ... "that something else other than short selling is at hand here to depress BRNs market val."
I personally think that the shorters and other interested parties are now just waiting to see what the upcoming " LUMPY" 4C will disclose.
Your comments all are valid when explaining the situation here.Shorting is of course only one tool of market manipulation.
There's using sentiment as a tool (fear and greed both ways).
Fake buy volume, fake sell volume.
"Fake" sells or buys between different accounts of the same holder or institution.
Algorithmic bot trading, using all of the above etc etc.
The share price of any company (if there is sufficient money to be made) is always manipulated, either up or down, for maximum profit.
The underlying vehicle, is irrelevant.
Your previous posting doesn't display the level of naivete that you claim.
Maybe I'm just mistaken, calling you smart..
Now you see, that's the type of sentiment manipulative post, which shows your intelligence and why your previous attempts at mis-information, in regards to the actual short position, are all the more curiousYour comments all are valid when explaining the situation here.
Here's another take:
It would be fair to say that anyone holding BRN shares currently is not unintelligent despite its drop from the top floor to the basement. There could be any number of reasons for holding onto them.. Therefore I would not call anyone who paid to own BRN shares dumb, although it would be easy to draw that conclusion.
I would only hold them if I hadn't paid for them, Ie a company director, or an employee.
It's still beyond me why smart investors hold shares of a company hitting new 52-week lows consistently week after week, and trailing below multiple key moving averages.
It's fairly obvious that a company with high shares on issue will take a lot longer to accumulate and turn the trend around into positive territory from a downtrend.
But, hey, as you say, It's probably easier to focus on fixed-mind principles and talk about agendas and blame manipulation and greed, rather than the actual company.
Its BRN that needs to do the convincing, or at least the technicals of the trading tangibility that shows a positive trend. Preferably both for a sustained and orderly price.
You'd have to agree, that all of the over 100 million borrowed shares that have been sold onto the market, are all in the money.Your comments all are valid when explaining the situation here.
Here's another take:
It would be fair to say that anyone holding BRN shares currently is not unintelligent despite its drop from the top floor to the basement. There could be any number of reasons for holding onto them.. Therefore I would not call anyone who paid to own BRN shares dumb, although it would be easy to draw that conclusion.
I would only hold them if I hadn't paid for them, Ie a company director, or an employee.
It's still beyond me why smart investors hold shares of a company hitting new 52-week lows consistently week after week, and trailing below multiple key moving averages.
It's fairly obvious that a company with high shares on issue will take a lot longer to accumulate and turn the trend around into positive territory from a downtrend.
But, hey, as you say, It's probably easier to focus on fixed-mind principles and talk about agendas and blame manipulation and greed, rather than the actual company.
Its BRN that needs to do the convincing, or at least the technicals of the trading tangibility that shows a positive trend. Preferably both for a sustained and orderly price.
Ah I see.. I might go and do a collation of non aggregate daily sales and see what’s transpired the past week..You'd have to agree, that all of the over 100 million borrowed shares that have been sold onto the market, are all in the money.
So why don't they just cash it in..
Maybe, just maybe, they can't do that, without sufficient volume sold to them, at the current prices..
Could be a bit of a dilemma, if real buying pressure, was to increase for some reason..
I mean some would say, that there just seems to be too much genuine buying, at these levels..
Ah I see.. I might go and do a collation of non aggregate daily sales and see what’s transpired the past week..