Chilla
Regular
Direct your juiced up anger and frustration at those who caused this situation…..Cominiere, MoP, Zijin, Cong and Eckhof FFS!
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
They did not pay them self a bonus, well maybe they did but not out of AVZ shareholders money.
What I have said, is it wrong or incorrect? I dont think it is, I like to talk in facts. The fact is, why do they think they are entitled to a bonus? Please enlighten me. They are employed or contracted to work in the fucking DRC so no extra payments there. And as I have said before, Nigel walks out on the South African conference when he finds out that the MoM has cancelled the decree, great fucking leadership!
With regard to Graeme’s super. I’m not certain, but I believe the sale was due to needing to rebalance his SMSF, this is a trustees obligation if the SMSF assets do not reflect the funds stated objectives, due to price movements etc. I also have the feeling that he maybe sold these shares to Nigel? Anyone else recall this? Very vague memory of all this.
Chilla
Regular
Yes correct Nigel purchased off market
Fuck off,
disclaimer - I voted against the other wankers who should be locked up for their treasoness crimes
Fuck off. I run my own superfund, not that I am an expert. You can say what you like but how it looks the optics are terrible. They knew what was happening. Lets not forget that they wanted to give John Clarke fucking performance shares before had had started in the job FFS. It was voted down thank goodness. This BOD has absolutely treated the shareholders with absolute contempt.
disclaimer - I voted against the other wankers who should be locked up for their treasoness crimes
Misfits
Regular
Oh my!
Again am I incorrect? Have you been around that long? What I have said is correct. Please show me incorrect you fuck wit
Misfits
Regular
Intelligent response you pussy
Misfits
Regular
Yep, intelligence personified.
Hemicuda
Regular
Red wine or no red wine it’s the facts
oxxa23
Regular
I agree and was one of the first to protest it when annual report was released... but, people have likely had a rough week and are probably sick of hearing negative shit, justified or not.... so say your piece and let others go about their night and reading...
I voted for 1, as I feel it is better for our long term prospects, not because I agree with it in the slightest...
Wine time...
Depends on your perspective, as you say, you believe our long term prospectives are better by voting for 1. What if our long term perspectives are better by voting against 1 in the belief that this would motivate our BOD.
disclaimer: I have voted in line with the BOD.
I have been in this for over 5 years, do you remember the steak and red wine, lol. It has been very hard, and to see the BOD continually treat the shareholders this way is hard to take.
Are you okay? Are you with us or MMGA?
Mate, have a chat with Beisha and Jag, they know me. I, like many other are just frustrated with what is happening. like I said previously I will be attending the AGM so I would be happy to chat with you there. I am against the other mob (I dont even like saying their name) it detests me so much. I am 100% behind AVZ, saying that, if I believed that if someone could produce better results than what we have currently, then I would support that.
I was at the last AGM and was one of the few that directly ask the board questions
Disclaimer: I received a call from Shaun and advised that I had voted as the board directed.
I should also respond to your question "Are you ok". No I am not. I have put up with this for over 5 years. The continual state of yeah were going to get the license and to then have the rug pulled from underneath you. I am not ok, this is absolutely wrong and not what I invested in. I invested in the biggest lithium resource known (unknown at the time, leap of faith) and to have it deferred by corrupt and illegal actions, I am not ok.
Last edited:
Similar threads
