buena suerte :-)
BOB Bank of Brainchip
Correct that's how it looks
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
Hi K...
I'm sure Tony can explain what's unfolded, I won't speculate, and an hour ago I actually sent Anil an email, very interesting.
Have a relaxing Christmas with family mate....Cheers C
Okeydokey01
Regular
I am digging back through the Top 20 holders lists for the last two years and am struggling to find any substantial change at or around this time or qty of shares? clearly this is above my pay grade...
Look at the date in the top right corner ....15th July 2001 ????
Ceased to be a substantial holder on 31 / 10 / 2022.
Company thought they would inform the marked today 21 / 12 /2023.
Then forgot to also post page two of a two page legal document .....??????
* Looking at our last Annual Report Anil had 84,999,933 shares on31st Jan 2023, this document indicates he sold 100 shares , presently holds 84,999,833. Unless of course this is yet another mistake ????.
Who ever is incharge of handling & filling these documents needs to be fired on the spot.
F#^%ING Disgrace.
Esq.
Ceased to be a substantial holder on 31 / 10 / 2022.
Company thought they would inform the marked today 21 / 12 /2023.
Then forgot to also post page two of a two page legal document .....??????
* Looking at our last Annual Report Anil had 84,999,933 shares on31st Jan 2023, this document indicates he sold 100 shares , presently holds 84,999,833. Unless of course this is yet another mistake ????.
Who ever is incharge of handling & filling these documents needs to be fired on the spot.
F#^%ING Disgrace.
Esq.
Perhaps
Regular
Need to have a look at older announcements, but I'm pretty sure the Merrill Lynch Nominee position belongs to Anil Mankar. In the last Top 20 list this was still in. As this is nearly the identical percentage of the announcement, maybe it was just the transfer from Family Trust to Nominee account. Bit mysterious yet.
Bennysmadness
Regular
Lower than 5% holding it appears, not a doing from Anil directly by the looks. All depends on shares on issue
Is the Merrill Lynch (AU) Nominees holding on behalf of Anil?
Perhaps
Regular
Yes, there exists an older announcement where this clearly is mentioned. I'm too tired now to start a search, but it's there.
Attachments
Dougie54
Regular
I’m sorry but am I missing something here —— this is a publicly listed company supposedly having to comply with ASIC.
how then can this notice with a transaction from 31/10/22 ,also the letter head at the top dates the page 15 July 2001.be shown to shareholders with a signing date of 21/12/2023. ????
Damo4
Regular
Wow this forum just gets better and better hahah
https://asic.gov.au/regulatory-reso...notice-of-ceasing-to-be-a-substantial-holder/
2001 is both the Corporations Act date, and the date of the form (NOT CREATED BY BRN), see above link
Date of change is: 31/10/22
Anil signature date: 21/12/23
Market Release date: 21/12/23
https://asic.gov.au/regulatory-reso...notice-of-ceasing-to-be-a-substantial-holder/
2001 is both the Corporations Act date, and the date of the form (NOT CREATED BY BRN), see above link
Date of change is: 31/10/22
Anil signature date: 21/12/23
Market Release date: 21/12/23
buena suerte :-)
BOB Bank of Brainchip
Thanks C ..... Happy Christmas to you also mate ...cheers
Damo4
Regular
Thanks Perhaps.
So the holding has increased from 84,999,833 to 86,515,610. The sky isn't falling?
Perhaps
Regular
employee incentive plan maybe?
Okeydokey01
Regular
Merrill Lynch nominees P/L holdings
Pre effective date
27/10/2022 - 93,279,151
Post effective date
27/01/2023 - 85,978,727
Most recent published Top 20
22/10/2023 - 86,515,601
It appears there is nothing to see here. I would say some sort of transfer is most likely. And dare say the 2001 at the top of the form relates to the form edition and has nothing to do with the activity itself.
Pre effective date
27/10/2022 - 93,279,151
Post effective date
27/01/2023 - 85,978,727
Most recent published Top 20
22/10/2023 - 86,515,601
It appears there is nothing to see here. I would say some sort of transfer is most likely. And dare say the 2001 at the top of the form relates to the form edition and has nothing to do with the activity itself.
Fullmoonfever
Top 20
Tend to agree with you at this point though usually they disclose that under nature of change but seeing the date is odd or a mistake or the filing was delayed blah blah, missing the exact nature of change wouldn't surprise me either.
Dilution from LDA and/or RSU releases may have tipped the 5%.
Though, from memory and can't be bothered checking if honest, a sub notice is supposed to be filed within about 5 days or something like that from date of occurrence as per ASX rules.
Hardly release ASX Ann's but when we do, they tend to make simple errors
Damo4
Regular
Similar threads
