Would you even call SNN's a Neural Network architecture?But has there ever been any indication that Meta was indeed an EAP customer at the time? Any announcement as with other EAP customers? If not, we shouldn’t simply assume so.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. There would be an NDA and it is possible that Meta insisted on secrecy about the collaboration.
I did not assume Meta was an EAP. I thought there was a reasonable inference to be made based on the available evidence.
I have trouble understanding your 6 week window. It seems to be unsupported conjecture.
Chris Jones said
“So, about a year ago, uh, I was at Meta, I was in their AI Infrastructure Group, and on an almost daily basis I would see new neural network architectures.
So, when I was introduced to BrainChip, I didn’t think I would really be impressed by anything a small team was gonna develop, erm. They told me about TENNs, I was a little bit skeptical to be honest at first. As I started getting to understand the benchmarks and a little bit more of the math and how it worked, I started to get pretty excited by what they had.”
Your contention is that this means "on an almost daily basis (in the last 6 weeks) of my time at Meta, I would see new NNs."
... and then, ... and then ... and then ... (along came Jones), some time after he left Meta, someone introduced him to TeNNs while he was on gardening leave.
I find that quite implausible.
A possible alternative interpretation is "Up until about a year ago, I was at Meta, and on an almost daily basis I would see new NNs."
" So, when I was introduced to BrainChip, I didn’t think I would really be impressed by anything a small team was gonna develop, erm. They told me about TENNs, I was a little bit skeptical to be honest at first."
Does that sound like someone on gardening leave, or someone with the weary or arrogant disdain of the "not-invented-here" attitude nurtured in a mega-corporation.
Chris jones was introduced to Brainchip, and they told him about TeNNs. So was the Akida marketing group going around talking to random gardeners in the off-chance they wished to lay out a lazy $5M for a licence?
The more we discuss this, the more I am inclined towards the possibility of Meta being an EAP. Mr Ed is galloping this way.
Isn't the architecture all about how many hidden layers there are, and how many nodes in each layer?