BRN Discussion Ongoing

HopalongPetrovski

I'm Spartacus!
In answer to your question (specifically how do I know their input).. well, on the price sensitive announcement is said the board voted for it unanimously....(to consider the redomicile)....

And I am not a proxy for Steve Liebeskind, I am simply a shareholder who desperately wants to see change, and I think he will be able to help with that.

Simple as that.....
Yeah. OK. Just had a look back through your history of postings here.
You are very keen on Liebeskind.

And many of your posts reveal that you are pretty disgruntled with the current board and management.
That's ok. Lots are. I have some sympathy with that.

It does however baffle me that Steve Liebeskind will not speak for himself publicly.
He is seeking our votes in order to win a place on the board and yet will not put his case to us.
That is reason enough for me not to vote for him.

PS...... as regards the vote I am certain the Board would demand a unanimous vote on a proposed redomicile, as boards are wont to do in such matters.
They would hardly be likely to try and proceed with a split vote on such a monumental decision.
But none of us know what was included in the discussion leading up to the vote, which is merely the formal resolution.
To pretend otherwise is balderdash.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 12 users

HopalongPetrovski

I'm Spartacus!
  • Haha
Reactions: 11 users
Well he hasn’t responded to me 🤷‍♀️ I was very polite 🤔
1746176840224.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 7 users
These popped up a LinkedIn post a few days ago linking to a blog article on their website.

Akida gets a few mentions throughout including our epilepsy work.

Wonder if we've ever had any conversations.




embedUR leverages its expertise in AI, Edge Computing, IoT, Networking, and Cloud to develop complex products and solutions for a Fortune 500 customer base. Our vision is to create precise, dynamic and truly intelligent edge devices that can make real-time decisions efficiently.



How Neuromorphic Chips Could Redefine Edge AI Devices​


For the past decade, AI development has focused on feeding models more data, increasing processing speeds, and pushing traditional silicon chips to their limits. But we may have hit a wall with current systems. Today’s AI systems rely on conventional computing architectures that process data sequentially, consuming massive amounts of energy in the process. This approach is effective but inefficient—especially for real-time, power-sensitive applications.
A new frontier in AI is emerging—neuromorphic computing. Inspired by biological neurons, this groundbreaking technology enables AI to learn dynamically, adapt in real time, and operate with unparalleled energy efficiency. Instead of performing brute-force calculations, neuromorphic chips process data using event-driven architectures, activating only when new information is detected—much like the way our brains respond to stimuli.
From autonomous systems that react instantly to their surroundings to medical diagnostics that analyze patient data in real time, neuromorphic computing is unlocking a new era of AI—one that is not just faster, but fundamentally smarter. In this article, we’ll explore how this innovation is reshaping AI and why it’s a game-changer for the future.

What Are Neuromorphic Chips, and How Do They Work?​

Neuromorphic chips are a groundbreaking advancement in computing, designed to replicate the structure and functionality of the human brain. Unlike conventional processors—such as CPUs, GPUs, and even modern MCUs—that process data sequentially or in parallel with predefined instructions, these chips leverage spiking neural networks (SNNs), a model that mimics how biological neurons communicate through discrete electrical spikes.
This brain-inspired approach enables a fundamental shift in AI processing, offering greater efficiency, adaptability, and ultra-low power consumption. As AI continues to evolve, neuromorphic computing is set to surpass traditional architectures, redefining the future of artificial intelligence (AI) and edge computing.
At their core, neuromorphic chips operate using event-driven computation. Instead of continuously processing data in fixed intervals like traditional CPUs, GPUs, and MCUs, they activate only when specific “spikes” or events occur. Think of it like a security light that only turns on when it detects movement rather than staying on all night. This asynchronous processing significantly reduces energy consumption and enhances efficiency, making neuromorphic chips ideal for dynamic, real-time applications such as robotics, autonomous systems, and next-generation IoT devices.

Breakthrough Innovations That Set Neuromorphic Computing Apart​

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs)​

SNNs process information by transmitting spikes between neurons, where the timing of each spike encodes critical data—unlike conventional neural networks that rely on continuous signal flow. This results in faster and more efficient computation for real-world applications:
IBM’s TrueNorth chip enables 46 billion synaptic operations per second at ultra-low power, supporting applications like sensory data processing in autonomous vehicles.
Intel’s Loihi 2 chip accelerates defect detection in BMW’s smart factories, reducing inspection time from 20ms to just 2ms through adaptive SNNs.

Integrated Memory and Processing​

Neuromorphic chips merge computation and memory within the same architecture, eliminating the von Neumann bottleneck—a fundamental limitation of traditional processors that separates memory from processing. This integration:
  • Minimizes data transfer delays and power consumption, boosting efficiency.
  • Powers Samsung’s neuromorphic smart cameras, which reduce cloud dependency by 40% while improving real-time response speeds.

Analog Computing for Energy Efficiency​

Many neuromorphic systems employ analog circuits to simulate the continuous dynamics of biological neurons, consuming significantly less energy than digital processors:
Stanford’s Neurogrid system, for instance, enables energy-efficient drone navigation in complex environments—using just 1/10,000th the power of traditional GPUs.

Architectural Differences: Neuromorphic vs. Traditional Processors​

Unlike GPUs and Tensor Processing Units (TPUs), which process data in predefined batches, neuromorphic chips activate only in response to events—making them far more efficient for sparse and dynamic workloads. This adaptability positions them as a revolutionary technology in AI, robotics, and intelligent edge computing.
FeatureNeuromorphic ChipsGPUs/TPUs
Processing StyleEvent-driven, asynchronous. Responds to sensor changes in <1ms (SpiNNaker system)Batch processing, synchronous (~20ms for NVIDIA GPUs)
Data FlowSparse spike-based communicationDense matrix operations
Memory IntegrationUnified memory-compute architectureSeparate memory and compute
Energy EfficiencyUltra-low power consumption (Intel Loihi: 15 pJ per synaptic operation)Higher energy requirements (NVIDIA A100: ~400W)

Why Neuromorphic AI Could be a Game-Changer for Edge Devices​

Neuromorphic-2-768x484.png
Neuromorphic AI addresses the major limitations of current Edge AI systems
Neuromorphic AI represents a groundbreaking leap for edge devices, addressing the major limitations of current Edge AI systems. By mimicking the human brain’s structure and leveraging spiking neural networks (SNNs), neuromorphic chips offer exceptional energy efficiency, real-time processing, and scalability—key advantages for battery-powered devices and low-latency applications.

Limitations of Current Edge AI Solutions​

1. Power Inefficiency​

Traditional Edge AI relies on GPUs or TPUs, which continuously process dense data and consume high amounts of power. This makes them impractical for battery-operated devices like wearables or IoT sensors. For example, NVIDIA’s Jetson AGX Xavier (32W) drains a wearable’s battery, within hours. In contrast, neuromorphic alternatives like Qualcomm’s Zeroth processor enable Samsung’s Galaxy SmartTag to last six months on a coin-cell battery by only activating during motion detection.

2. Latency Issues​

Although Edge AI reduces latency compared to cloud-based AI, traditional hardware still struggles with real-time responsiveness due to batch processing. This delay can be critical in time-sensitive applications like autonomous driving and industrial automation, where even milliseconds count.

3. Bandwidth Constraints​

Edge devices often operate in areas with limited network connectivity. Transmitting large datasets to the cloud for processing can cause bottlenecks and increase operational costs. While current Edge AI solutions perform some computations locally, they still rely on frequent data transfers for complex tasks, straining bandwidth.

4. Scalability Challenges​

Many edge devices lack the computational power to support large AI models effectively. While model quantization reduces model size, it often compromises accuracy and performance. Scaling AI across different edge applications remains a challenge.

Key Advantages of Neuromorphic Chips in Edge AI​

1. Energy Efficiency​

Neuromorphic chips consume only 1% to 10% of the power used by traditional processors due to their event-driven architecture.
Event-Driven Processing: Unlike GPUs and TPUs that constantly process data, neuromorphic chips activate only when needed—similar to how a motion sensor turns on a light only when movement is detected. This reduces unnecessary energy usage.
Example: IBM’s TrueNorth chip reduced energy consumption by 98% in DARPA’s autonomous robotics trials by eliminating redundant data transfers.
Integrated Memory and Compute: Neuromorphic systems combine memory and processing in a single architecture, minimizing energy loss from constant data movement—a key issue in traditional von Neumann processors.
This efficiency is crucial for battery-powered edge devices, such as smartwatches and industrial sensors operating in remote locations.

2. Real-Time Processing​

Neuromorphic chips process data instantly rather than in predefined batches, making them ideal for latency-sensitive applications.
Asynchronous Operations: Their event-based nature allows immediate responses to inputs, unlike traditional processors that must wait for a full batch cycle.
Example: Prophesee’s event-based vision sensors, when paired with Sony’s neuromorphic chips, detect pedestrians 20ms faster than conventional frame-based cameras—a critical advantage for autonomous vehicles navigating urban environments.
Reduced Cloud Dependency: Since neuromorphic chips handle inference locally, they eliminate the need to send data to cloud servers for processing. This reduces latency, enhances reliability, and ensures smooth performance even in low-connectivity environments.
Privacy Benefits: By keeping data on the device, neuromorphic AI improves privacy, reducing exposure to cyber threats. For instance, in healthcare wearables, sensitive biometric data can be processed locally instead of being transmitted over networks.

3. Scalability for Energy-Efficient Devices​

Neuromorphic architectures are inherently scalable, allowing seamless deployment across various edge devices.
Compact Design: These chips are lightweight and small, making them ideal for integration into smart cameras, IoT sensors, and even next-generation hearing aids.
Optimized for Sparse Data: Unlike traditional AI, which struggles with irregular data patterns, neuromorphic AI excels at handling sparse datasets—such as sporadic sensor readings—without requiring excessive computational power.
Adaptive Learning: Neuromorphic systems can adapt to changing conditions in real time without retraining large models, making them versatile across multiple industries.

Industries Benefiting from Neuromorphic Edge AI​

Neuromorphic-3-768x439.jpg
Healthcare, industrial IoT, automation all make use of neuromorphic AI

I) Even Smarter Consumer Gadgets​

Neuromorphic edge AI is redefining consumer electronics by combining ultra-low power consumption with advanced AI capabilities, enhancing efficiency and user experience across multiple devices:
Smartphones: Qualcomm, in partnership with Prophesee, integrates neuromorphic vision sensors into Snapdragon platforms, improving camera performance in dynamic and low-light conditions.
Wearables: BrainChip’s Akida processor powers fitness trackers and medical wearables, enabling real-time analysis of ECG, glucose levels, and sleep patterns while extending battery life by 10–100x compared to conventional chips.
Smart Home Devices: Neuromorphic systems process voice commands and gestures locally, reducing cloud dependency and latency for touchless smart speakers and home automation systems.

II) Industrial IoT (IIoT)​

Neuromorphic edge AI is revolutionizing manufacturing and logistics by enabling real-time, energy-efficient data processing for predictive maintenance, automation, and anomaly detection:
Predictive Maintenance: Accenture Labs’ neuromorphic systems analyze vibration and thermal data to detect machinery anomalies in real-time, reducing downtime by 30%. Intel’s Loihi chip processes sensor data with milliwatt-level power consumption, making it ideal for remote monitoring in industries like oil and gas.
Robotic Automation: SynSense’s Speck chip enables robots to mimic human movements with sub-millisecond latency, optimizing assembly line efficiency. BrainChip’s Akida enhances robotic vision for high-precision quality inspection in manufacturing.
Anomaly Detection: Analog neuromorphic circuits process sparse sensor data in noisy industrial environments, enabling real-time defect detection in 3D printing and production lines.

III) Autonomous Systems​

Self-driving cars, drones, and robotics rely on neuromorphic AI for real-time perception and decision-making, reducing latency and power consumption:
Autonomous Vehicles: Neuromorphic vision chips, such as Prophesee’s Event-Based Metavision sensors, process LIDAR and camera inputs at 0.1ms latency, enabling collision avoidance without cloud reliance.
Drones: SynSense’s neuromorphic processors enable drones to navigate complex environments autonomously, making them ideal for agricultural monitoring and disaster response.
Vision-Based Robotics: Intel’s Loihi chip powers warehouse robots that dynamically adjust paths using real-time sensor fusion (LIDAR + camera), reducing energy consumption by 40%.

IV) Healthcare AI​

Neuromorphic edge AI is driving advancements in diagnostics, wearable health monitoring, and remote patient care:
AI-Powered Diagnostics: Neuromorphica’s medical devices analyze EEG/ECG data locally, detecting seizures and arrhythmias with 99% accuracy. Tata Elxsi’s neuromorphic ultrasound systems provide on-site musculoskeletal injury assessments in sports medicine.
Medical Wearables: Stanford’s Neurogrid enables continuous glucose monitoring with a 30-day battery life, while BrainChip’s Akida powers implantable neurostimulators for epilepsy management.

Key Players and Market Availability Timeline​

The neuromorphic computing market is poised for explosive growth, with its valuation expected to surge from $28.5 million in 2024 to $1.33 billion by 2030, representing an astonishing CAGR of 89.7%. This rapid expansion reflects the increasing demand for AI systems that are not only powerful but also energy-efficient and capable of real-time processing.
Leading the charge in this technological revolution are industry giants such as Intel, IBM, Qualcomm, Samsung, and Sony, all investing heavily in neuromorphic architectures to drive the next wave of AI innovation.
CompanyFlagship ProductCommercial LaunchProduction Deployments
BrainChipAkida NSoC2024 (pre-orders)Edge AI Box (industrial/retail)
IntelLoihi 22021 (announced)Sandia Labs Hala Point (2024)
SynSenseSpeck2023Vision processor demo kits
PropheseeGenX320 Sensor2023Edge AI devices (AR/VR prototypes)

Challenges in Adopting Neuromorphic AI & Future Outlook​

1. Lack of Industry-Wide Standardization​

The neuromorphic AI ecosystem remains fragmented due to incompatible frameworks, protocols, and dependencies:
Programming Interfaces: Tools like PyNN and Intel’s Lava aim to standardize neuromorphic programming, but adoption remains limited. For example, PyNN supports only a subset of hardware (BrainScaleS, SpiNNaker), while others like Loihi require custom frameworks.
Communication Protocols: Many neuromorphic devices use Address-Event Representation (AER) for spike-based data transmission. However, vendor-specific implementations (e.g., Prophesee vs. BrainChip) hindering seamless interoperability.
Host Dependency: Many neuromorphic systems still rely on conventional computers for pre- and post-processing, negating their energy efficiency benefits. Optimizing host-device communication remains an open challenge.

2. Immature Software Ecosystem​

Mainstream AI frameworks struggle to integrate with neuromorphic systems:
Framework Compatibility: Traditional AI platforms like TensorFlow and PyTorch lack native support for spiking neural networks (SNNs). Solutions like BrainChip’s MetaTF facilitate CNN-to-SNN conversion, but performance gaps persist.
Algorithm Development: SNN training methods lack standardization. While tools like PyCARL bridge CARLsim and PyNN for co-simulation, most research remains confined to niche applications.
Toolchain Limitations: Neuromorphic-specific compilers and debuggers lag behind those developed for GPUs and TPUs, limiting software maturity and usability.

3. Scalability Concerns​

Hardware and material limitations restrict large-scale neuromorphic adoption:
Physical Scaling: Current neuromorphic chips, such as Loihi and TrueNorth, support only ~1 million neurons—far below the 86 billion in biological brains. Scaling requires advancements in 3D integration and high-density memristor technology.
Material Challenges: Existing materials (e.g., metal oxides, chalcogenides) present trade-offs between endurance and energy efficiency. Emerging 2D materials like graphene show promise but remain in early development.
Thermal Management: Analog circuits in neuromorphic chips generate significant heat under load, limiting device density and long-term reliability.

Future Outlook and Emerging Trends​

The future of neuromorphic AI looks promising as it begins integrating with existing AI pipelines and evolving into more practical applications. Hybrid systems that combine neuromorphic and von Neumann architectures are gaining traction, particularly in edge-cloud synergy, where neuromorphic chips handle real-time sensor data locally while cloud-based GPUs manage batch training.
This approach has been demonstrated by Accenture, which integrated Loihi-powered robots to enhance AI efficiency. Additionally, the rise of federated learning techniques such as LFNL has enabled decentralized SNN training across edge devices, significantly reducing data traffic and energy consumption compared to traditional federated learning models.
The growth of neuromorphic software tools is accelerating adoption, with open-source frameworks playing a key role. PyNN has emerged as the de facto standard for SNN simulation, supporting hardware platforms like BrainScaleS and SpiNNaker, while ongoing developments aim to extend compatibility to Loihi and Dynap-SE.
Intel’s Lava framework provides composable blocks for SNN development, enhancing cross-platform model portability. Furthermore, researchers are exploring the potential of quantum-neuromorphic hybrids, leveraging quantum reservoirs to push the boundaries of AI efficiency.
Neuromorphic AI is set to drive self-learning AI at the edge. With innovations like Intel’s Loihi 2, robots and edge devices can now adapt to environmental changes in real-time—without requiring retraining. This development is particularly redefining for the Internet of Things (IoT), where ultra-low-power neuromorphic sensors, like Prophesee’s event cameras, facilitate always-on smart infrastructure with minimal power consumption.
In healthcare, platforms like Stanford’s Neurogrid and BrainChip’s Akida are paving the way for real-time medical applications, including epilepsy detection and personalized treatments. As these advancements continue, neuromorphic AI is set to become a cornerstone of next-generation intelligent systems, bridging the gap between biological and artificial intelligence. Read more about strategic alliances between chip makers and manufacturers driven by AI/ML integration.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 19 users

Guzzi62

Regular
Actually I asked Lou the question about reconciling to the America and he stated if we were join as a 3rd tier listing on nasdaq we would require a share price of $1usd and said it was very expensive and risky for shareholders and that the company would have more than a wish and a promise to survive the transition.

I also spoke about Steve and he said that he had the company at heart and would provide expertise and balance to the BoD plus he knows the technology and the markets, so unless the company can persuade me otherwise I’ll be voting against listing in America and a big fat yes to Steve joins the BoD
Okay, that's Lou's opinion that's opposite PVDM's.

I have more faith in the biggest shareholder and founder of the company than a dodgy ex CEO that left suddenly, pocketing 15 million shares in the process.

I have no opinion about Steve, but the BoD says no thanks and so will I.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users
Okay, that's Lou's opinion that's opposite PVDM's.

I have more faith in the biggest shareholder and founder of the company than a dodgy ex CEO that left suddenly, pocketing 15 million shares in the process.

I have no opinion about Steve, but the BoD says no thanks and so will I.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 6 users

GazDix

Regular
Whatever happens with Brainchip, you cant say it isnt entertaining.....

We get journalist hit pieces, partnerships with world leading defense companies, a whole internet forum is born out of shareholder dedication to the stock, we help build glasses that can detect seizures, we are helping companies build robotic security dogs, we play a constant game of cluedo with Linkedin interactions, and our scandals range from un-ironed table cloths at trade shows to people playing dress up as a disgruntled Ex Ceo.

There is something uniquely batshit insane about being a shareholder of this company, i love every moment of it. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Go BRN
Spot on.

The Brainchip Poster's Spectrum:


WHY THE HELL WOULD IS BRAINCHIP STILL A GOOD BET? BRAINWASHED BRAINCHIPPERS
YOU INVEST IN BRAINCHIP?

<----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

Why the hell would you invest in Brainchip?

Does not own any shares.

Posts frequently.

Will give a love or fire emotion if anyone writes anything critical of Brainchip.

Hides behind strong anonymous identities.

‘Revenue… where is the revenue?…’

Focusses on the next AGM meeting and promotes a spilling of the board just one 1 month after the last one.

Will only focus on price when it is in a downtrend.

Will focus on criticizing poster rather than the matter at hand when there is good news.

Suggests but never proves they have insider knowledge.

When any positive announcements are made: ‘Wheeeerrrreee is the revenueeeee?’

Brainwashed Brainchippers:

Have gone ‘all in’ on Brainchip as an investment.

Posts frequently.

Will never give a like or emotion to anyone who makes good points. Other posters are not worthy.

Hides behind strong anonymous identities.

‘If you don’t like it, just sell.’

Thinks that posters who bring up the company’s costly 2 to 3 year mistake of flip-flopping between being IP or chips led is ‘crying over spilt milk’.

Will only focus on price when it is in an uptrend.

Gets very defensive when any kind of bad news is announced or spins a positive light on it.

Is Brainchip still a good bet?

Shares research that could be positive or negative freely.

Celebrates good news, but also acknowledges mistakes and possible red flags of the company.

Can change opinions.

Freely gives out likes when deserved.

Usually posts infrequently.

This is just an initial model. Feel free to adapt / add or subtract as you wish. If feeling offended, check the spectrum above and see that maybe balance isn't really your thing and either improve or shout at it a lot to make you feel better.
 

jrp173

Regular
Yeah. OK. Just had a look back through your history of postings here.
You are very keen on Liebeskind.

And many of your posts reveal that you are pretty disgruntled with the current board and management.
That's ok. Lots are. I have some sympathy with that.

It does however baffle me that Steve Liebeskind will not speak for himself publicly.
He is seeking our votes in order to win a place on the board and yet will not put his case to us.
That is reason enough for me not to vote for him.

PS...... as regards the vote I am certain the Board would demand a unanimous vote on a proposed redomicile, as boards are wont to do in such matters.
They would hardly be likely to try and proceed with a split vote on such a monumental decision.
But none of us know what was included in the discussion leading up to the vote, which is merely the formal resolution.
To pretend otherwise is balderdash.

Your comment above: PS.. as regards the vote I am certain the Board would demand a unanimous vote on the proposed domicile....

This shows you clearly don't understand how a Board works, they CANNOT demand a unanimous vote... That's the whole point of having multiple directors!

You should google what is the role of a NED, but here's a head start for you...

1746180091778.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users

GazDix

Regular
Whatever happens with Brainchip, you cant say it isnt entertaining.....

We get journalist hit pieces, partnerships with world leading defense companies, a whole internet forum is born out of shareholder dedication to the stock, we help build glasses that can detect seizures, we are helping companies build robotic security dogs, we play a constant game of cluedo with Linkedin interactions, and our scandals range from un-ironed table cloths at trade shows to people playing dress up as a disgruntled Ex Ceo.

There is something uniquely batshit insane about being a shareholder of this company, i love every moment of it. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Go BRN
Spot on.

The Brainchip Poster's Spectrum:

1746180161849.png


Why the hell would you invest in Brainchip?

Does not own any shares.

Posts frequently.

Will give a love or fire emotion if anyone writes anything critical of Brainchip.

Hides behind strong anonymous identities.

‘Revenue… where is the revenue?…’

Focusses on the next AGM meeting and promotes a spilling of the board just one 1 month after the last one.

Will only focus on price when it is in a downtrend.

Will focus on criticizing poster rather than the matter at hand when there is good news.

Suggests but never proves they have insider knowledge.

When any positive announcements are made: ‘Wheeeerrrreee is the revenueeeee?’

Brainwashed Brainchippers:

Have gone ‘all in’ on Brainchip as an investment.

Posts frequently.

Will never give a like or emotion to anyone who makes good points. Other posters are not worthy.

Hides behind strong anonymous identities.

‘If you don’t like it, just sell.’

Thinks that posters who bring up the company’s costly 2 to 3 year mistake of flip-flopping between being IP or chips led is ‘crying over spilt milk’.

Will only focus on price when it is in an uptrend.

Gets very defensive when any kind of bad news is announced or spins a positive light on it.

Is Brainchip still a good bet?

Shares research that could be positive or negative freely.

Celebrates good news, but also acknowledges mistakes and possible red flags of the company.

Can change opinions.

Freely gives out likes when deserved.

Usually posts infrequently.

This is just an initial model. Feel free to adapt / add or subtract as you wish. If feeling offended, check the spectrum above and see that maybe balance isn't really your thing and either improve or shout at it a lot to make you feel better.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users
Maybe best case scenario is a u.s. buyer is lurking in the background, offers the Company 15 billion of dollars (made up figure of course) and they say, right now Brainchip you need to buy back all the australian shares at ($6.27 AUD, the price that you quoted @jrp173 ) and then float it all on the u.s. market under our subsidiary name.

That's all the Australian shareholders have been bought out at the u.s. float price, done and dusted.
Well to me this would be a win win for us shareholders and a win win for the company to move smoothly to u.s.

Then we can all buy the u.s. shares as we wish.

Well I am hoping that my theory is actually reality. And I'm not dreaming, I'm wide awake at work number crunching lol


Your theory/scenario is perfect, and next Tuesday would be perfect timing to bring it up :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Meanwhile...the real author of probably the most talked about recent post on HC and here :rolleyes:


1746180026810.png


Jokes aside and I like to think I don't rant toooo often....I find it amusing and concerning at the same time that people actually give this thing so much oxygen.

Irrespective of whether it is the real Lou or not, I'm surprised people clamour over some ex CEO's post on a forum of his "opinion" like it's some sort of gospel.

Does he have an axe to grind does he not, is he genuine, is he not...who knows.

I don't give a rats how each holder votes as that is their right but all this back and forward here and on HC of posters appearing to try and influence how people should vote is pretty pathetic imo.

If you're invested and play in the market you should be able to put the big boy or girl pants on and make a decision on your own.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 22 users

HopalongPetrovski

I'm Spartacus!
Your comment above: PS.. as regards the vote I am certain the Board would demand a unanimous vote on the proposed domicile....

This shows you clearly don't understand how a Board works, they CANNOT demand a unanimous vote... That's the whole point of having multiple directors!

You should google what is the role of a NED, but here's a head start for you...

View attachment 83596
Perhaps you have never actually been on a committee. 🤣
 
Last edited:
  • Fire
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users

The Pope

Regular
I am in a similar boat except my buy price is .49c (still up the creek without a paddle) if this redomicile eventuates. I can’t see any positives in our current financial position anyway ? My plan is to set up a SMSF and transfer them into that, this way I shouldn’t be forced to sell at a loss and because they are currently under water there should be no CGT payable just a transfer fee I assume ? Have you considered this option, thoughts ?

I can’t see management batting an eye lid over loss of retail holder wealth unfortunately. The consolidation required, at this point, to even consider a move to the US you would have to think would destroy retail holders wealth. It would be a necessity to even make it possible to list on a US exchange. This one fact alone gives you an insight into the mindset of some of our current BOD

Like others have mentioned I think this Redomicile talk is a distraction tactic to shift focus from our obvious lack of commercial traction, so the freebies are approved and the hard questions are side stepped.
I’m all for a move to the US but in our current state we would first be diluted to oblivion and then because of our lack of revenue and huge operationslal spend crushed by aggressive shorting.

My opinion only…
Fyi - I had placed a number of enquires to my Australian super fund over the past few weeks linked to transferring to SMSF etc if BRN BOD confirm intent to redomicile to US stock exchange. It was a-bit like calling Telstra a few times and getting slightly different responses so went with emails only so they replied via email (recorded)

In short, AustralianSuper does not offer in-specie transfers.

That means no transfers to other retail or industry or SMSF. I also assume other Australian super funds would be exactly the same stance with retail shareholders”

This would mean pending what price you purchased compared to current price then you may be a solid negative value if forced to sell due to redomicile (no duel listing)

If you have BRN shares currently in SMSF then it appears nothing to worry about compared to shareholders who have BRN shares in a Australian super fund (retail or industry by the looks of it)

———————————————————-

I did get a good reply from Tony Dawe a few weeks ago and he replied with this (removed a couple of sentences at start (And Sean was cc)I This was also due to my original email I had cc Sean into the email when sent to tony for a reply)

Most of Tony’s reply is captured below, word for word”. I assume Tony wouldn’t mind given its general wording and doesn’t appear to be personalised information”

“Your position is not dissimilar to other shareholders who have contacted me since Brainchip announced it was investigating a redomiciling to the US, and who have articulated similar issues regard their shareholding in Australian Index linked super funds.

As I have repeatedly stated to other shareholders, the process of investigating the process of redomiciling does not mean that the Board has formally decided to redomicile to the US.

I don’t want to presume what the Board will choose to do, so at present we must wait to see what happens and allow the Directors to conclude their deliberations.

Such an important and strategic decision will not happen without allowing time for consultation and to gather feedback from our shareholders.

We expect this important issue will be discussed at length at the AGM in May and these discussions will be helpful to the Board in making an informed and balanced decision.

The Board is interested in gaining feedback and insights from our shareholders, and I am passing on all the feedback I receive from shareholders to ensure the Board gets to hear the full spectrum of opinions, both positive and negative.

Be assured that the specific issues regarding your super fund and its restrictions on foreign domiciled equities have already been raised by me with our CFO Ken Scarince, who is spearheading our investigation into redomiciling.

Your views, and the views of all shareholders who express an opinion on the matter, will be shared with the Board and if the Board decides to proceed with the decision to redomicile, you and all shareholders will be afforded an opportunity to vote on the matter.

At the end of the day the Board must act in the best interests of shareholders and do what it believes will deliver the best outcome for the future of the Company”
————————————————————-

Also as FYI, I really wanted to go the AGM on Tuesday 6/5 I’m Sydney to chat more with BRN management team but unfortunately I will not be able to attend in person. I have attended the last few years in person. I will be attending online though and post questions for BRN BOD to r hopefully respond to. I hope all attendees post really good questions to the BRN BOD and Sean.

However, I do recall again at last AGM that there a number of questions left unanswered or put on notice but don’t recall BRN providing offical responses back for attendees to review.

Cheers
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 30 users

manny100

Top 20
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 23 users

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
I 100% agree Xray. It will be important to keep the board on task in responding to the current state of affairs. The time for fluff and bluff is gone. A lot of statements have been made and things implied in past AGM's and podcasts. Sure progress has been made, but very few, if any of these statements delivered with enthusiastic optimism around soon to be realised signings/earnings have materialised. It is time for fact and material information on where the company is at now.

I also agree that the proposition of moving to a foreign exchange is an important one to discuss. However, there are more pressing points that should be first given air time. I have not been able to make sense of the timing of this announcement. It flies in the face of all prior correspondence on the matter. There must be a catalyst which has changed the timeframe, it is the boards responsibility to disclose this voluntarily. I would hope that at very least we are provided a broad stroke update on this in Sean's address. I truly hope it is not simply to defer shareholders attention. However some real transparency next week is critical. An AGM should be an event that provides us with updates and information rather than one that sees us leaving scratching our heads more questions than answers. We have great tech and some wonderful talented individuals on the team, I would hate to think that the efforts of many are being stifled by the actions of a few.

All in my opinion of course

Thanks OKD,

You said "I have not been able to make sense of the timing of this announcement. It flies in the face of all prior correspondence on the matter. There must be a catalyst which has changed the timeframe, it is the boards responsibility to disclose this voluntarily".

What do you think the catalyst might be? What in your mind could have provoked the "change of heart" to alter management's decision about a listing in the US, when up until the last AGM they didn't mention it at all, in fact I remember it being actively negated.
 
  • Fire
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

manny100

Top 20
The AI wait has just started. We have got in early with plenty of run way to make $$$$.
See link below. The adoption of AI has only just started. The impatient are getting very anxious.
AI Adoption Timeline Estimates - by AnEngineerInvestor

AI Adoption Estimates:
"​

  • 0% → 1% (2020 - 2025):
    • Early adoption phase with AI-driven automation, chatbots, and generative models.
    • Enterprises experimenting with AI in finance, healthcare, and software development.
  • 1% → 50% (2025 - 2035, Estimated):
    • Mass adoption across industries, increasing integration into daily workflows.
    • AI-driven decision-making, automation, and personal AI assistants become mainstream.
    • Governments and businesses invest heavily in AI infrastructure.
  • 50% → 100% (2035 - 2045, Estimated):
    • AI reaches near-total penetration in business and consumer applications.
    • Widespread autonomous systems, AI-driven healthcare, and education.
    • Potential regulatory frameworks and ethical considerations shaping the final stage of AI adoption.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!

I love your work Manny, but I don't think it's fair to post information without showing the publishing dates.
 

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
The AI wait has just started. We have got in early with plenty of run way to make $$$$.
See link below. The adoption of AI has only just started. The impatient are getting very anxious.
AI Adoption Timeline Estimates - by AnEngineerInvestor

AI Adoption Estimates:

"​

  • 0% → 1% (2020 - 2025):
    • Early adoption phase with AI-driven automation, chatbots, and generative models.
    • Enterprises experimenting with AI in finance, healthcare, and software development.
  • 1% → 50% (2025 - 2035, Estimated):
    • Mass adoption across industries, increasing integration into daily workflows.
    • AI-driven decision-making, automation, and personal AI assistants become mainstream.
    • Governments and businesses invest heavily in AI infrastructure.
  • 50% → 100% (2035 - 2045, Estimated):
    • AI reaches near-total penetration in business and consumer applications.
    • Widespread autonomous systems, AI-driven healthcare, and education.
    • Potential regulatory frameworks and ethical considerations shaping the final stage of AI adoption.


But BRN doesn't have a great run way Manny!

By comparison, Weebit has a little under $100 million (that is 31 quarters) in runway at their current burn rate.

I'm not trying to be a pain in the arse, I'm trying to point out the obvious.

BrainChip needs to turn a profit soon or we won't survive (unless we cap raise YET AGAIN and continue to get diluted to the max).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Fire
Reactions: 18 users

manny100

Top 20
Spot on.

The Brainchip Poster's Spectrum:

View attachment 83597

Why the hell would you invest in Brainchip?

Does not own any shares.

Posts frequently.

Will give a love or fire emotion if anyone writes anything critical of Brainchip.

Hides behind strong anonymous identities.

‘Revenue… where is the revenue?…’

Focusses on the next AGM meeting and promotes a spilling of the board just one 1 month after the last one.

Will only focus on price when it is in a downtrend.

Will focus on criticizing poster rather than the matter at hand when there is good news.

Suggests but never proves they have insider knowledge.

When any positive announcements are made: ‘Wheeeerrrreee is the revenueeeee?’

Brainwashed Brainchippers:

Have gone ‘all in’ on Brainchip as an investment.

Posts frequently.

Will never give a like or emotion to anyone who makes good points. Other posters are not worthy.

Hides behind strong anonymous identities.

‘If you don’t like it, just sell.’

Thinks that posters who bring up the company’s costly 2 to 3 year mistake of flip-flopping between being IP or chips led is ‘crying over spilt milk’.

Will only focus on price when it is in an uptrend.

Gets very defensive when any kind of bad news is announced or spins a positive light on it.

Is Brainchip still a good bet?

Shares research that could be positive or negative freely.

Celebrates good news, but also acknowledges mistakes and possible red flags of the company.

Can change opinions.

Freely gives out likes when deserved.

Usually posts infrequently.

This is just an initial model. Feel free to adapt / add or subtract as you wish. If feeling offended, check the spectrum above and see that maybe balance isn't really your thing and either improve or shout at it a lot to make you feel better.
Accurate based on observations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

dippY22

Regular
I 100% agree Xray. It will be important to keep the board on task in responding to the current state of affairs. The time for fluff and bluff is gone. A lot of statements have been made and things implied in past AGM's and podcasts. Sure progress has been made, but very few, if any of these statements delivered with enthusiastic optimism around soon to be realised signings/earnings have materialised. It is time for fact and material information on where the company is at now.

I also agree that the proposition of moving to a foreign exchange is an important one to discuss. However, there are more pressing points that should be first given air time. I have not been able to make sense of the timing of this announcement. It flies in the face of all prior correspondence on the matter. There must be a catalyst which has changed the timeframe, it is the boards responsibility to disclose this voluntarily. I would hope that at very least we are provided a broad stroke update on this in Sean's address. I truly hope it is not simply to defer shareholders attention. However some real transparency next week is critical. An AGM should be an event that provides us with updates and information rather than one that sees us leaving scratching our heads more questions than answers. We have great tech and some wonderful talented individuals on the team, I would hate to think that the efforts of many are being stifled by the actions of a few.

All in my opinion of course
Okey-dokey wrote:
There must be a catalyst which has changed the timeframe, it is the boards responsibility to disclose this voluntarily. I would hope that at very least we are provided a broad stroke update on this in Sean's address.... "

I agree there must be a catalyst, but whether there is a responsibility for the board to disclose it is beyond my pay grade. I am not a corporate lawyer.
So whether the board should disclose or not will not be addressed by me. You may be right OD.


However, as to the catalyst which has changed there certainly are some possibilities that have surfaced in the past year. In my mind a catalyst may be a specific deep pocketed company which has become most interested in Brainchips technology in the past year.

Large companies such as Airbus, and RTX come to mind. Both have demonstrated an interest, or partners they work with (Neurobus + Airbus) have.
But, Brainchip isn't seeking to redomicile to France are they? And Frances market is significantly larger than Australia's. So what about that catalyst?

I propose that a company like RTX is significant enough and potential contract(s) lucrative enough for RTX to be that catalyst. But is contracting with a large US defense contractor like rolling out of bed, ....or easy? I think not. And if RTX tells Brainchip if they can move their ass over here (America) quickly RTX could be the sugar daddy whose potential contract funds Brainchip for five years +/-. Now where have I heard that line before?
Oh, yeah,...Antonio Vianna, .....Chairman of the Board. Ahhhh, ....Never mind him, he was probably just blowing smoke to shut people up.

Now, does anyone here think if RTX was interested in giving Brainchip a long term contract or take a minority interest in the Brainchip company that RTX would announce such a thing publicly? Well, I don't.

But what I do believe is the Antonio was revealing some truth when he did as Bravo' new best friend, her chatbot, suggested.....reveal something, anything to perhaps reflect that the company is close, REAL close to busting the big one,.....and the defense contractors *** in the USA are very interested in Brainchips technology (imo). And we know the RTX is dipping their toe in the Brainchip pool. Perhaps, they would jump in all the way if just a few more conditions that MUST BE MET are met. Like maybe redomiciling to the US for meeting RTX and US government regulations related to defense or top secret work.

Who knows. I don't know. Maybe no one knows. But our key exec's know some things. That much I know.

I stand with Brainchip and their executive team.

Regards, dippY

*** or Anduril (about 15 minutes drive from Brainchips office)
or NASA
or Boeing
or .....
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 25 users
Top Bottom