AVZ Discussion 2022

[Retrobyte]

This is exactly why I want to see what assurances the US can build into their peace agreement.... most likely it will be something along the lines of "try to f^*% with us down the road and suffer the wrath of the US military", which has pretty much kept the world in check so far - I would imagine there would be a contingent number of US personnel and bases setup to protect American business interests, under the guise of keeping peace

Peace, you say? Hot off the press ....




The most concerning line in the video was "no more electric tanks"

 

[Winenut]

Rather then call people dickheads you could just scroll on if you don't like Samus' post....its literally what you said you do

That sounds extremely logical to me

 

[Spikerama]

Peace, you say? Hot off the press ....




The most concerning line in the video was "no more electric tanks"

Well that certainly put a dampener on things.

 

[Samus]

Samus just give it up dude. I don't have a problem. All I see is you dickheads banging on about this day in day out. Enough already.

Some people say the ignore function is useful but really, I never put people on ignore. If I'm not interested in what someone has to say I find it quick easy to simply scroll to the next post. Truly. It's not that hard.

I don't know why people get so triggered by this kind of shit. It's really childish. And the amount of energy and heartache you generate trying to call out all this mind numbing, silly little personal beef. These people aren't even worth the 1 milliwatt worth of electricity you type in complaining. Even that is a waste of energy.

Let it go.

Hello @Spikerama. Do you see any post of mine for the past 3 days constructive or otherwise? What about @Winenut @Xerof @Remark @Dave Evans @Frank or any interactions with posts from those users?
Will you enjoy your time here with the emerged, bots and multi user profiles of the trolls?
Careful what you wish for, you honestly can't be that much of a moron surely! There is a bad actor here controlling the narrative of the forum and you say you don't have a problem?
I'm just potting it out there that it's Yaseen, j19 and now newly the emerged TanCa. Who knows what other profiles.

 

[Skar]

Peace, you say? Hot off the press ....




The most concerning line in the video was "no more electric tanks"

Its called peace through superior firepower. We want increased military spending, they don't want electric tanks fine, throw all that lithium into autonomous drones, its not like you want to be constantly refuelling those and sure they could be nuclear but you probably don't want to risk losing them too often then.

 

[Pokok]

Hello @Spikerama. Do you see any post of mine for the past 3 days constructive or otherwise? What about @Winenut @Xerof @Remark @Dave Evans @Frank or any interactions with posts from those users?
Will you enjoy your time here with the emerged, bots and multi user profiles of the trolls?
Careful what you wish for, you honestly can't be that much of a moron surely! There is a bad actor here controlling the narrative of the forum and you say you don't have a problem?

So Samus are you saying somebody is having their posts moderated as they are posted ???

 

[Winenut]

So Samus are you saying somebody is having their posts moderated as they are posted ???

100%

 

[Pokok]

100%

WTF what are these cunts up to and for what reason I am sure their server can be tracked down

 

[Winenut]

WTF what are these cunts up to and for what reason I am sure their server can be tracked down

Can just about guarantee the gaslighting will start next...

 

[Pokok]

WTF what are these cunts up to and for what reason I am sure their server can be tracked down

so whatever group is doing this it could easily shut this site

 

[Spikerama]

Hello @Spikerama. Do you see any post of mine for the past 3 days constructive or otherwise? What about @Winenut @Xerof @Remark @Dave Evans @Frank or any interactions with posts from those users?
Will you enjoy your time here with the emerged, bots and multi user profiles of the trolls?
Careful what you wish for, you honestly can't be that much of a moron surely! There is a bad actor here controlling the narrative of the forum and you say you don't have a problem?

Yes I see some of your posts. but to be honest I don't have time to hang on every persons musings so I check in occasionally when I have a spare moment. Look it's obviously not good and I think @zeeb0t should be able to figure out what's what if he ever pokes his head in.

May serve as a reminder to people that misuse of the Report function can result in a complete ban.

 

[Pokok]

I think it's this clown. Shim seems to get so much satisfaction out of reposting the results of his "work".

https://x.com/hibaggywaggys/status/1926607874119152002

An absolute ass wipe IMO.

Arrr a sl$%# eyed rice eater

 

[ptlas]

so whatever group is doing this it could easily shut this site

Put them on ignore.
No need too argue.
Save your emotions.
Preserve the integrity of the thread.
Preserve the site.

It ain't difficult.

I know I've had a few goes in the past; won a few battles, maybe lost a few.

BUT

Do you want to fight continual wars?

 

[Anthony Van Dyck]

Re: Roche Dure was measured at approx. 317Mt tonnes of spodumene ore at 1.63% converting to about 12.9Mt LCE

You may need a bigger boat because:

In January 2024, Roche Dure Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resource increased to 669 million tonnes (Mt) grading 1.61% Li2O, 690ppm Sn, and 33ppm Ta, containing 10.79 Mt of lithium oxide. Measured + Indicated = 500Mt, and Inferred = 169Mt.

Your recalculations will be interesting.

Cheers
F

Lol completly missed that, with those numbers i will be able to buy a bigger boat.

Was trying to be really conservative with my numbers and show even with lower numbers how much its worth.
It's hard to calculate "fair value" when its the biggest in the world.
Also probably not the best thing to be comparing it to however it was recent

Kobolt better have deep pockets

p.s. If anyone thinks 0.63c is fair value im more than happy to take you up on that offer

 

[Samus]

Yes I see some of your posts. but to be honest I don't have time to hang on every persons musings so I check in occasionally when I have a spare moment. Look it's obviously not good and I think @zeeb0t should be able to figure out what's what if he ever pokes his head in.

May serve as a reminder to people that misuse of the Report function can result in a complete ban.

You just be sure to check on these posts a bit later mate.

 

[Pokok]

Put them on ignore.
No need too argue.
Save your emotions.
Preserve the integrity of the thread.
Preserve the site.

It ain't difficult.

I know I've had a few goes in the past; won a few battles, maybe lost a few.

BUT

Do you want to fight continual wars?

I cant work out who to put on ignore , some new people do a first post but have been here for a few years staying silent

 

[Samus]

Put them on ignore.
No need too argue.
Save your emotions.
Preserve the integrity of the thread.
Preserve the site.

It ain't difficult.

I know I've had a few goes in the past; won a few battles, maybe lost a few.

BUT

Do you want to fight continual wars?

Doesn't matter if you have them on ignore or not once they target you.
I've got them all on ignore.

 

[Spikerama]

You just be sure to check on these posts a bit later mate.

Ok I will.

 

[Jazz]

Different story from China when the shoes on the foot….

“In the lead-up to election day, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government had been working "for some time" to get the port back into Australian hands.

But Xiao, who visited Darwin port last weekend, said the lease signed between Landbridge and the NT government 10 years ago was completely legitimate.

The ambassador also said the Chinese company had invested heavily in the port.

Xiao said he was hoping the federal and Northern Territory governments "will create a fair, transparent, and predictable business environment" for Chinese enterprises in Australia.”

China warns Australian government over plan to retake Darwin port

 

[Stockinvesting]

Just passing on .........someone posted in The Australian article on AVZ over the weekend , that BOD are well aware that SH expectations are above ATH and mentioned circa of 1.50 and being fully franked was his mail. Anything less and the BOD are aware it may trigger legal action against them.

"Someone posted in the Austalian article....."
WTF?.. Who?. What does this even mean?
What BS! How do you "post" in a newspaper article?

"..mentioned circa of $1.50......"

Who????? WTF????? Explain yourself. What crap!

Please, PRODUCE THE ARTICLE!!