BRN Discussion Ongoing

[Doz]

Once upon a time reading dates was easy , not so much now ….

Note : 2/8/26 = 8th February 2026 ….

 

[White Horse]

Been doing some exploring.
This pic from CES. "AFEELA"

AFEELA - EV | Sony Honda Mobility

AFEELA: A new generation of mobility pulsing with intelligence. Inviting you to be part of the future of mobility. Reserve yours now.

www.shm-afeela.com

Sony and Honda Form A Strategic Alliance In Mobility

​

 

[Mccabe84]

A couple of line wipes going on atm. 8 million shares gone just like that

 

[Sotherbys01]

I have a feeling we could go "pre NR" very soon......

 

[Food4 thought]

Nice GREEN start to the week

 

[7für7]

Been doing some exploring.
This pic from CES. "AFEELA"

View attachment 94237

AFEELA - EV | Sony Honda Mobility

AFEELA: A new generation of mobility pulsing with intelligence. Inviting you to be part of the future of mobility. Reserve yours now.

www.shm-afeela.com

Sony and Honda Form A Strategic Alliance In Mobility

​

I was watching this topic long time ago….
But in that case, I think it’s just a sponsor band.

 

[HopalongPetrovski]

Just traders taking their pips atm I fear.
Need some significant news to get us moving properly.

 

[7für7]

Just traders taking their pips atm I fear.
Need some significant news to get us moving properly.

Later we’ll end up getting another speeding ticket, BrainChip will say they don’t know nothing, and then it’ll drop back to 18,xx cents again… the usual gamblers’ game. They exploit every situation… unfortunately.

 

[manny100]

I dont u understand Akida 3,
The only way I can is because 1000,1500 ,and 2 are flying ,
But where seeing nothing in regards to revenue yet, In Ces how was 3 recieved?
In saying all this A.I is just beginning so lets see

Hi Jacob, there is a fair time gap between deals with volume commitments and revenue.
Serious investors will not spend 1 second worrying about the past or revenue.
Serious investors will look to accumulate when they see real signs that contracts with volume are on the horizon.
2026 should see some real accumulation in anticipation of deals with volume commitments.
Markets are future orientated and contracts = future revenue.
Parsons have volume supply written into their contract. Bascom Hunter and RTX may emerge with volume orders at some stage.
Onsor say they expect to launch in 2026 and Cybersecurity is now commercial.
We know that there are engagements underway. We also know that AKIDA Cloud speeds up time from 'having a look' to Prototype and that the Hubs have pretrained models to 'spoon feed' Developers.
By the time recurring revenue is coming in the horse called 'Share Price' will have bolted and probably done half a dozen laps of the course.
That is why posters are saying 2027 should see action - deals with volume commitments. With luck we may even see something emerge later this year.

 

[Jacob Kiraz]

Hi Jacob, there is a fair time gap between deals with volume commitments and revenue.
Serious investors will not spend 1 second worrying about the past or revenue.
Serious investors will look to accumulate when they see real signs that contracts with volume are on the horizon.
2026 should see some real accumulation in anticipation of deals with volume commitments.
Markets are future orientated and contracts = future revenue.
Parsons have volume supply written into their contract. Bascom Hunter and RTX may emerge with volume orders at some stage.
Onsor say they expect to launch in 2026 and Cybersecurity is now commercial.
We know that there are engagements underway. We also know that AKIDA Cloud speeds up time from 'having a look' to Prototype and that the Hubs have pretrained models to 'spoon feed' Developers.
By the time recurring revenue is coming in the horse called 'Share Price' will have bolted and probably done half a dozen laps of the course.
That is why posters are saying 2027 should see action - deals with volume commitments. With luck we may even see something emerge later this year.

Thanks for the detailed response, just a question how many shares would you consider being a decent shareholder, Do you know much re the share NVU

 

[Diogenese]

Once upon a time reading dates was easy , not so much now ….

Note : 2/8/26 = 8th February 2026 ….


View attachment 94236

The most efficient way from a computer's point of view id YYYYMMDD. That saves a few Flops per date.

 

[SharesForBrekky]

Thanks for the detailed response, just a question how many shares would you consider being a decent shareholder, Do you know much re the share NVU

Hi JK, this is just my thoughts and not sure if it's the correct way to go about figuring what the average shareholder has, but I'm thinking there's roughly 2 billion shares issued and there's about 45,000 shareholders. So I'm thinking 2 billion/45,000 which is just under 45,000 shares for the average shareholder. So anything above that is above average.

If anyone can correct me on this, please do so.

 

[jrp173]

Hi Jacob, there is a fair time gap between deals with volume commitments and revenue.
Serious investors will not spend 1 second worrying about the past or revenue.
Serious investors will look to accumulate when they see real signs that contracts with volume are on the horizon.
2026 should see some real accumulation in anticipation of deals with volume commitments.
Markets are future orientated and contracts = future revenue.
Parsons have volume supply written into their contract. Bascom Hunter and RTX may emerge with volume orders at some stage.
Onsor say they expect to launch in 2026 and Cybersecurity is now commercial.
We know that there are engagements underway. We also know that AKIDA Cloud speeds up time from 'having a look' to Prototype and that the Hubs have pretrained models to 'spoon feed' Developers.
By the time recurring revenue is coming in the horse called 'Share Price' will have bolted and probably done half a dozen laps of the course.
That is why posters are saying 2027 should see action - deals with volume commitments. With luck we may even see something emerge later this year.

manny100 has been spending to much time with FactFinder on the other site. All this nonsense about "serious" investors or "genuine" investors. What a load of nonsense..... Does manny100 think he/she is some sort of bloody oracle?

 

[Tothemoon24]

The Secret to Next-Gen XR: It’s Not About Megapixels, It’s About Architecture
We have reached a plateau in XR (Extended Reality) hardware. Adding more pixels or faster GPUs isn't solving the three biggest hurdles: Heat, Weight, and Motion Sickness. The solution isn't "more power"—it’s a fundamental shift in how we process data. We are moving from Video → Meaning.
The "Meaning-at-Source" Revolution
In traditional headsets, a camera takes a high-res video of your eye and sends it to the main processor. This is "dumb data." It wastes battery and creates heat.
The 2026 breakthrough is Layer 1 (L1) Computing. Instead of a video, the sensor itself (or a tiny dedicated ASIC) extracts the Gaze Vector.
Traditional: Sending 60 frames of video per second.
2026 Shift: Sending a simple coordinate (X, Y).
This is the "EyeChip" philosophy: Extraction happens at the silicon level.
The 5-Layer Tech Stack (2026 Supplier Map)
To understand where the industry is heading, we must look at the layers of the hardware stack:
Layer 1: Meaning-at-Source (Eye ASICs)
Ganzin (Taiwan): Their new AURORA IIE is a game-changer. It’s an ASIC that consumes <20mW. It processes eye-tracking locally, so the main chip can stay cool.
BrainChip (USA): Using neuromorphic AI to track eyes without ever "seeing" an image—perfect for medical privacy.

 

[H2 goes up]

Hi JK, this is just my thoughts and not sure if it's the correct way to go about figuring what the average shareholder has, but I'm thinking there's roughly 2 billion shares issued and there's about 45,000 shareholders. So I'm thinking 2 billion/45,000 which is just under 45,000 shares for the average shareholder. So anything above that is above average.

If anyone can correct me on this, please do so.

Hi SFB, I think that in statistics, the word 'average' is a collective name for mean, median and mode. The idea of an average is to use one number to 'typify' all of the numbers in the group/population/sample.

You have correctly calculated the mean. The sum of all the shares held divided by the number of shareholders. However, in this case, I don't think it is the best number to describe the 'average' holding.

As of 28 April 2025, the top 50 shareholders held about 48% of the stock. If we then look at the other 44950 shareholder who own the other 52% (or about 1.04 billion) the average (mean) shareholding is about 23000 shares.

I think that in this case the median shareholding is probably the best indicator as it is not skewed as much by the atypical holdings. This is why you always hear about median house prices and not average (meaning mean) house prices. A few big ones skew the results away from 'typical'.

I think that the best way to answer your own question is to look at the following table from the last annual report, put your hand on your tummy and rub in a clockwise fashion and see what number jumps into your head.

Cheers,
H.

 

[SharesForBrekky]

Hi SFB, I think that in statistics, the word 'average' is a collective name for mean, median and mode. The idea of an average is to use one number to 'typify' all of the numbers in the group/population/sample.

You have correctly calculated the mean. The sum of all the shares held divided by the number of shareholders. However, in this case, I don't think it is the best number to describe the 'average' holding.

As of 28 April 2025, the top 50 shareholders held about 48% of the stock. If we then look at the other 44950 shareholder who own the other 52% (or about 1.04 billion) the average (mean) shareholding is about 23000 shares.

I think that in this case the median shareholding is probably the best indicator as it is not skewed as much by the atypical holdings. This is why you always hear about median house prices and not average (meaning mean) house prices. A few big ones skew the results away from 'typical'.

I think that the best way to answer your own question is to look at the following table from the last annual report, put your hand on your tummy and rub in a clockwise fashion and see what number jumps into your head.

View attachment 94247

Cheers,
H.

Cheers H2, definitely makes sense what you're saying, especially when looking at the table and comparing the big discrepancies between the % values and number of shareholders for each shareholder range.

 

[7für7]

Over 25 million shares traded on ASX just to end up with a rise of 0,005 dollar at 19 cents

At least not 18.5

 

[Jacob Kiraz]

Over 25 million shares traded on ASX just to end up with a rise of 0,005 dollar at 19 cents

At least not 18.5

News and revenue will only sort this problem

 

[TECH]

Good afternoon,

Dr. Steve Harbour with all due respect can continue focusing on his Analog Technology I am very happy to keep investing in our
Digital Neuromorphic Architecture, and if correct that Dr. Harbour stated that "Digital isn't really Neuromorphic" that is no
different to using this comparison, CD's, DVD's store music and movies, but they "aren't really music or movies" which is
obviously, a stupid statement.

Time will tell if an actual working chip, as in mass production, with no repeatability issues and so on can actually be achieved, but
in the meantime, we'll just keep focusing on our brilliant edge AI.

My opinion only.........Tech.

 

[itsol4605]

Neuromorphic-Computing-Explained
Brain-Inspired-AI-Hardware-and-Spiking-Neural-Networks