BRN Discussion Ongoing

Bravo

Meow Meow 🐾
From the crapper…. Why is Brainchip recently a Nr. 1 topic with AI created stuff?



View attachment 96617



Re the nuclear-detection paper comparing Akida, SpiNNaker and Loihi 2 there were comments that Akida delivered the fastest inference but lower accuracy due to the 4-bit quantisation constraint.

This raises the question which generation of Akida was actually tested?

I imagine most academic work still uses the first widely available Akida hardware (AKD 1000), which typically runs models in INT4 precision to maximise power efficiency. As far as I understand it, it's great for speed and edge deployment, but a lower precision naturally introduces quantisation error that can impact accuracy.

What’s interesting is that later iterations of the Akida architecture support higher precision and mixed-precision approaches (e.g. INT8). Presumably moving from 4-bit to 8-bit precision could entail a significant recovery of accuracy.In other words, if the same benchmark were run using higher-precision modes or newer Akida generations, you might see Akida maintain its inference-speed advantage while narrowing or (hopefully) even eliminating the accuracy gap with Loihi 2??

If so, it would be very interesting to see how the results change under those conditions.





Screenshot 2026-03-29 at 11.17.50 am.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 9 users

Bravo

Meow Meow 🐾
  • Fire
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users

7For7

Regular
Re the nuclear-detection paper comparing Akida, SpiNNaker and Loihi 2 there were comments that Akida delivered the fastest inference but lower accuracy due to the 4-bit quantisation constraint.

This raises the question which generation of Akida was actually tested?

I imagine most academic work still uses the first widely available Akida hardware (AKD 1000), which typically runs models in INT4 precision to maximise power efficiency. As far as I understand it, it's great for speed and edge deployment, but a lower precision naturally introduces quantisation error that can impact accuracy.

What’s interesting is that later iterations of the Akida architecture support higher precision and mixed-precision approaches (e.g. INT8). Presumably moving from 4-bit to 8-bit precision could entail a significant recovery of accuracy.In other words, if the same benchmark were run using higher-precision modes or newer Akida generations, you might see Akida maintain its inference-speed advantage while narrowing or (hopefully) even eliminating the accuracy gap with Loihi 2??

If so, it would be very interesting to see how the results change under those conditions.





View attachment 96679


On the end it’s a waiting game… as usual. Let’s see what we will see from now on! 🙏 🤞
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Top Bottom