‘Both’ parties need to agree to extend once the extension date is up for renewal ; if either party doesn’t agree then the deal is off and both go on their way ; neither have to pay the $20m .If Cath cancel the deal, lots of problem solved. Such as $AVZ will have $20m more cash -_-
‘Both’ parties need to agree to extend once the extension date is up for renewal ; if either party doesn’t agree then the deal is off and both go on their way ; neither have to pay the $20m .
If either decided to cancel prior to the renewal date ; then that’s when payout would occur .
As we have currently passed the last extension date ; there’s no penalty for either party walking if they choose to
AVZ needs to retain 51% majority JV control….so they won’t agree to finalise the 24% to CATH until they have full and final court decision on 75% ownership. As it stands 60% is undisputed so max they would agree to sell to CATH until highest court confirms the 75% is a sale of 9% to CATH. And we are told CATH are good with that as their main requirement is guaranteed Offtake. My opinion is if that’s the case do a Offtake Prepayment Agreement and take the ownership out of the transaction and proceed with guaranteed funding based on Offtake.Why does AVZ need to agree to extend? I disagree.
What is to stop AVZ saying give us the $240m as agreed, no more extensions. The mining licence requirement has been waived. If the $240 million is not received then CATH have breached the agreement?
I think there are reasons to want to partner with CATH which is likely why AVZ have previously agreed to extend, but I don't believe AVZ have to.
View attachment 33556
Like Fuck they would stump up 240mill in this mess with no ML in hand , CATH would have an out that’s not in AVZ’s announcements that we can see for sure..Why does AVZ need to agree to extend? I disagree.
What is to stop AVZ saying give us the $240m as agreed, no more extensions. The mining licence requirement has been waived. If the $240 million is not received then CATH have breached the agreement?
I think there are reasons to want to partner with CATH which is likely why AVZ have previously agreed to extend, but I don't believe AVZ have to.
View attachment 33556
When is the best time for squid normally off that jetty?Slow news day
No squid at Brighton off the jetty mid morning today
Exit stage left CATL, enter stage right US company. Well wouldn't that be nice.I did read a couple of days ago that CATL were on the blower to Australian lithium Companies, desperately seekingSusanSpoddy.
If I put 2 and 2 together, with the lack of CATH extension (so far) today, my calculator comes up with 24, i.e. 24% remaining with AVZ
Let's see, but if I had to dream up a good story, I'd go with AVZ not willing to go with a chinese partner anymore.
Second evil thought is: is CATH the distributor of AVZ info back to those other bastards?
Trust no-one, in fact I just blocked myself
GO WEST
24 hail Marys and definitely JMT
This is exactly how it will play out.Like Fuck they would stump up 240mill in this mess with no ML in hand , CATH would have an out that’s not in AVZ’s announcements that we can see for sure..
I reckon Z and CATH would be speaking to each and have a better understanding on how to pineapple company’s together..
DP IF YOU WILL…
CATH would still be keen & it’s part of their milking system IMO…
They longer they fuck with us stalling the project the cheaper it gets unless we keep drilling etc etc & hope for a TO but when the money runs out we have a issue….
Can Nige can play poker ?
IMO if Manono was Chinese owned and operated it would be producing by now..
As old mate said which made me laugh it’s 2023 and you can identify as anything even corrupt and get away with it…
Let’s hope Marius has a Easter Egg for all of us![]()
I’m 95% sure by now he would know this but fucking around digging isn’t helping mining Manono, it may just may help with selling it but probably not seeing as we already have some crazy bullshit proven deposit…This is exactly how it will play out.
This will drag out, AVZ will have no money, they will not be able to conjure up funding without some positive news in their arsenal.
It's sad..
I'm secretly hoping AVZ have been digging around in the WA outback looking for a Manono V2.0.
Nige needs to stop the flamin digging, revert to an absolute shoe string budget and just wait it out.
I did read a couple of days ago that CATL were on the blower to Australian lithium Companies, desperately seekingSusanSpoddy.
If I put 2 and 2 together, with the lack of CATH extension (so far) today, my calculator comes up with 24, i.e. 24% remaining with AVZ
Let's see, but if I had to dream up a good story, I'd go with AVZ not willing to go with a chinese partner anymore.
Second evil thought is: is CATH the distributor of AVZ info back to those other bastards?
Trust no-one, in fact I just blocked myself
GO WEST
24 hail Marys and definitely JMT
Theoretically you are absolutely spot on...........but we are dealing with the corrupt DRC and the corrupt chinese actors and rule of law doesnt apply it appears.....What I cannot understand is why AVZ has to bend over backwards for corrupt scum bags that have caused the shit show. In my view AVZ as 75% majority owner be given the ML and start building the mine as per FT aspirations. Whilst the mine is being built, the scum bags, Commierie Zingin and MMCS can sort the shit show they created. Cong has no leg to stand and has no place in the venture. DRC govt needs to wake up and get this project moving, the crap can be sorted in the background.
AVZ needs to retain 51% majority JV control….so they won’t agree to finalise the 24% to CATH until they have full and final court decision on 75% ownership. As it stands 60% is undisputed so max they would agree to sell to CATH until highest court confirms the 75% is a sale of 9% to CATH. And we are told CATH are good with that as their main requirement is guaranteed Offtake. My opinion is if that’s the case do a Offtake Prepayment Agreement and take the ownership out of the transaction and proceed with guaranteed funding based on Offtake.
When is the best time for squid normally off that jetty?dusk / dawn or all day round?
Can meet you there sometime to discuss AVZ if you want, and catch a squid or two.![]()
Pretty sure that Jules has already explained that the judical process, or next step, in prosecuting his report was beyond his brief of investigation. That it was up to FT now to follow thru, who in turn had been waiting to install a new batch of judges before proceeding.I have noticed that Jules posts this sort of rallying cry post quite often, but then when someone tries to engage him with the underlying truth of his apparent post-reporting impotence, he does not comment.
“1. The $240 million gives us time/options and prevents the Chinese from being able to easily wait until we run out of money (one of the possibilities that scares me most).”I am well aware of that. It would be a risk I would be tempted to take with the information I have.
Is there a chance AVZ could end up with less than 50% doing this? Yes.
We have good legal title to 75% and first right of refusal to Cominiere's share. For us to go under 50% we would have to lose to Dathomir AND Zijin. It is possible that this could happen in the DRC due to the corruption, but we would be well financed to continue operations and defend these challenges for years with the $240 million. Don't forget that if we continue to fuck around for years on end and run out of money, there is a real risk that we could lose the whole project.
1. The $240 million gives us time/options and prevents the Chinese from being able to easily wait until we run out of money (one of the possibilities that scares me most).
2. Having CATH invest $240 million means it is not only little AVZ who has a lot to lose if the project goes south. CATH are more powerful and have more influence than AVZ. I believe CATH met with the President at one stage. To me it is not only spreading the risk, but also decreasing it due to this increased power/influence.
3. The risk of AVZ going to under 50% control of Dathcom is a possibility, but it is not the worst possibility out there. I would much prefer to risk this than risk losing the project. The Chinese would build the mine quick and get things operational in record time. They would probably fuck around with transfer pricing etc, so we would not receive full value, but shareholders would likely still do well.
I look at examples like Komoa:
a joint venture between Ivanhoe Mines (39.6%), Zijin Mining Group (39.6%), Crystal River Global Limited (0.8%) and the Government of the Democratic Republic of Congo (20%)
Not ideal, but not the worst outcome.
AVZ has been suspended for almost a year. I want to get things moving.