Carlos Danger
Top 20
Looks like Felix read the MOU lmao
Like everyone else does I guess - importing hydroxide or carbonate, given the refinement infrastructure only currently exists in a few placee. Mostly Chyna Chyna Chyna. Even if construction on Manono in DRC started tomorrow I can't see them being able to construct batteries in-country using DRC lithium within 5 years, at an extremely optimistic minimim.You have no idea how the world works
I recommend you read the MOU. It is about building batteries in the DRC and isn't legally binding. How the fuck can you build batteries without lithium?
There is zero chance the gringos are going to fund a battery value chain in the DRC while corruption is rampant and all profits go to China imoLike everyone else does I guess - importing hydroxide or carbonate, given the refinement infrastructure only currently exists in a few placee. Mostly Chyna Chyna Chyna. Even if construction on Manono in DRC started tomorrow I can't see them being able to construct batteries in-country using DRC lithium within 5 years, at an extremely optimistic minimim.
The gringos as you put it would probably love to control a chain from production through to refinement and battery manufacturing, but they've been behind the eight ball at every stage in Africa and I don't think that's about to change. Hope you're right though! Manono could be a key piece in that puzzle if that indeed is their intent, and one they actually will act upon rather than all the usual talk and then, oops too late.
The gringos are doing this for themselves not NigelYou can’t build batteries without lithium mate. Are you implying that I don’t understand this concept. Or are you implying that I don’t know how the world works because I believe that an unbinding MOU signed by a bunch of American politicians may not have any bearing on the outcome of an Australian small cap miners outcome in 3 seperate arbitrations? DRC has been corrupt since heart of darkness. And continues to be. Do we really think the yanks will clean it up because a rich boy from Tasmania didn’t get to be a billionaire.
Oh I agree, that's partly why I don't think they'll be funding or building one at allThere is zero chance the gringos are going to fund a battery value chain in the DRC while corruption is rampant and all profits go to China imo
View attachment 38178
View attachment 38179
View attachment 38180
Elections have consequences imoIt's pretty clear Americans couldn't give a fuck about Manono or they would have invested in it in the first place.
Drawing some conclusion that holding an arbitration hearing in US courts means that they're backing AVZ is a desperate pack of bullshit imo.
A bit of diplomacy here and there that never amounts to anything, wank, wank, wank with a cheese grater.
It’s that fucking simple.Not exactly rocket science. The DRC wants AVZ to drop all legal actions against actors violating their legal rights, in which the DRC is either directly complicit, if not contributary due to being willfully inactive. We'll drop them when the DRC follows their own mining laws and Cominiere adheres to the terms of the JV. The DRC has been given more than enough chances to do the right thing.
I was being flippant. I thought that was implied in the tone. I’ve read the MOU. And I think you’re right Re the choice about the west vs China. What a fucking lame way for us all to lose money. Because a corrupt asshole threw his people under the bus. I wonder if Cath might weigh in in our support.The gringos are doing this for themselves not Nigel
Ultimately this is now up to Felix so it may still not have a bearing on a positive outcome for AVZ as he may choose China over the west
But if you had read the the MOU you would understand that it has absolutely nothing to do with cobalt import contracts lmfao
Dathcom still legally own the tenement. It would be much easier to buy us out than go through all the legal dramas of having it just awarded to someone else. The gringos are ruthless but they wouldn't be with an Australian company imo
Works for me!Then they would open themselves up to arbitration proceedings which could amount to billions and billions as the project starts generating money and it becomes obvious what it is really worth. USA are supposed to be an Australian ally also. May be better to pay $2 now rather than have a $10 billion arbitration claim.
It's pretty clear Americans couldn't give a fuck about ManonoIt's pretty clear Americans couldn't give a fuck about Manono or they would have invested in it in the first place.
Drawing some conclusion that holding an arbitration hearing in US courts means that they're backing AVZ is a desperate pack of bullshit imo.
A bit of diplomacy here and there that never amounts to anything, wank, wank, wank with a cheese grater.
It's pretty clear Americans couldn't give a fuck about Manono
*Maybe, Maybe Not, Time will tell, but for now the EU might
*To remind,
DRC-EU, value chain of strategic minerals: a memorandum of understanding will be signed before September
Before September 2023, a memorandum of understanding on the value chain of strategic minerals will be signed between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the European Union (EU), announced the spokesman of the government, Patrick Muyaya, at the end of the Council of Ministers led on Friday by the President of the Republic, Félix Tshisekedi.
The Head of State instructed the Prime Minister, Jean-Michel Sama Lukonde, to set up a multisectoral and inclusive Congolese team which will make up the negotiating committee empowered to discuss with European Union officials to lead to the signing of this protocol of agreement.
According to the government spokesman, President Félix Tshisekedi insisted that the two parties (DRC-EU) agree "on a roadmap around industrial projects for the transformation and valorization of critical minerals which will make it possible to accelerate the ecological transition in the DRC and in the European Union”.
“The Prime Minister has therefore been instructed to set up a multi-sector and inclusive Congolese team which will make up the negotiating committee empowered to discuss with European Union officials to lead to the signing, before September 2023, of a protocol agreement between the DRC and the European Commission through its delegation in our country.
The September deadline being that of the holding in Kinshasa of the DRC-Africa Forum devoted to battery metals, an opportunity for our country to highlight such an agreement,” said Patrick Muyaya.
Following the visit of French President Emmanuel Macron from March 3 to 5 in Kinshasa, the Minister of Mines of the DRC, the European Commissioner in charge of the internal market had started discussions for the conclusion of a partnership on the responsible value chain for strategic minerals, he recalled.
This meeting was sanctioned, specifies Muyaya, by a joint press release which emphasized the commitment of the two parties to launch negotiations and to set up a working group in order to continue the said discussions with the objective of concluding the strategic partnership between the European Union on the value chain of strategic minerals.
“However, at the end of the first round of discussions, it turned out that the scope of the partnership sought required a transversal approach requiring the involvement of all the sectoral ministries concerned, including the governance unit which is housed in the Presidential Council of strategic intelligence,” he said.
The DRC is one of the world's leading producers of cobalt and copper and the EU, which is among the main consumers, is convinced that this partnership will create jobs and growth for Congolese citizens and support Europe's ecological transition.
This partnership is part of the new EU strategy for the Great Lakes and the Global Gateway.
It will be based on four pillars, namely: the value chain of critical minerals, cooperation in research and innovation, alignment with environmental, social and governance criteria as well as capacity building.
mediacongo
Food for thought
Frank![]()
Absolutely not! US wants to win on green energy transition, we are talking about 25% world reserve of lithium in Manono. This is the same reason why we are in this predicament.MoUs are just that...
I think Sammael is pretty close to the money.
An MoU does not commit governments to do anything, or provide funding support. That's not the purpose of an MoU. An MoU is about in-principle support in building capacity for an aspirational goal that may or may not be realised at some time in the future. It's like the do-nothing option, but in a polite and politically palatable form.
And since the DRC will probably never get its battery value chain or its digital economy in place, there is no downside to signing an in-principle document of support.
Oh, and the USA has absolutely no intention of getting involved in the shitfuckery kingdom of the DRC, regardless of China's presence there.
Cheers
F
Absolutely not! US wants to win on green energy transition, we are talking about 25% world reserve of lithium in Manono. This is the same reason why we are in this predicament.