Already has been.is this going to be a we chat release only??
I believe someone asked Frank on the bird and he said the court case wasn’t completed ( or something similar ) so the 5% remain with Cominiere.@9cardomaha @Carlos Danger
Has there been any publication of the COMINIERE v MMCS ICC case yet, either publicly or privately. This is crucial for a lot of dominoes..... IMO
Someone posted here an email with organisers that confirmed she wasn't coming. I guess this also ties into her breaking her legs or something, but unclear as to the reason why she pulled outThere was some evidence floating around suggesting that Antoinette N'Samba Kalambayi wasn't attending the Perth Down Under conference. Does anyone still have this? Can't find it.
Someone I've been speaking to on Twitter seems to think she is still coming. She is still listed on the website, and I can't remember if she was removed at some point?
Someone posted here an email with organisers that confirmed she wasn't coming. I guess this also ties into her breaking her legs or something, but unclear as to the reason why she pulled out
@9cardomaha @Carlos Danger
Has there been any publication of the COMINIERE v MMCS ICC case yet, either publicly or privately. This is crucial for a lot of dominoes..... IMO
No publication of the case as far as I'm aware but in poker terms MMCS got raised on their bluff and foldedI believe someone asked Frank on the bird and he said the court case wasn’t completed ( or something similar ) so the 5% remain with Cominiere.
Could be wrong but that’s what I took from Frank
John25 any chance of a countdown for me![]()
I believe someone asked Frank on the bird and he said the court case wasn’t completed ( or something similar ) so the 5% remain with Cominiere.
Could be wrong but that’s what I took from Frank
Disappointing but I'll live with it mate. But please, can you let me know if I should be excited?Already has been.
TC.
Having her legs broken, she probably meant, she was afraid the angry Perth mob was going to kneecap her, both.@TDITD confirmed she's a no show by emailing the organisers.
It's a no brainier she wouldn't show up.
I think it's more like stalling tactics in the hope AVZ would be intimidated and compromise / give in . An attempt to weaken our position/ resolve . Didn't work .I think the penny just dropped for me in regards to the Zijin & Cominiere case against AVZ.
Perhaps I'm just slow and you're all like "No shit sherlock."
I think most of us assumed it's just a part of some "play", but a little worried they might have something none the less.
So to realise their reason now gives me closure on it.
It's just for appearances of course, to save face.
AVZ are saying they have acted poorly/illegaly.
They're a company and have people to answer to, so if they're to be seen as the good guys, they have to act in accordance with a company doing the right thing. If they were doing the right thing then that would mean AVZ is doing the wrong thing.
It follows that by AVZ not agreeing to their "perfectly legal" 15% aquisition in Dathcom, the bad and evil AVZ must be sued for all the damage they're causing to the good guys.
So that's what they must be seen to be doing, suing AVZ for disruption to the project, and their financial losses.
Because that's what a company doing the right thing would be doing!
*Edit: Oh and of course to apply threatening pressure to their opponent AVZ is a bonus.*
Of course they will never go ahead with the case, they just had to initiate proceeedings as a public display. Because that's what they would do IF they were in the right and were the good guys here. They've got BILLIONS to squander on these kinds of games.
But I think they're finally bowing out anyway with the headline above.
And they have to give a reason why they're bowing out other than their illegal activities being thwarted, so instead they just say it's too expensive.
Fuckers.
Could someone here enlighten me on the BNBT and AVZ spin that Sir Les/ Der Giest is talking about?