Cumquat Cap
Regular
Agreed, if it's looking like that route, lets sell this bitch and move on - can't wait til the AGM, hope they're held accountable
Just legal representation is my guess . Lets not even go down that route .It will take years . Then where does it go after that ? If something is on offer, does Nigel take a guaranteed outcome for share holders now OR does he roll the dice for an uncertain outcome years from now ? The Cone of Silence days are numbered .
Agreed, if it's looking like that route, lets sell this bitch and move on - can't wait til the AGM, hope they're held accountable
What constitutes a reasonable offer will be determined by the ICC proceedings and there isn't currently one that is worthy of presentation to shareholders given the expected outcomes of the cases imoFROM AMOVATIO ON HC
Agreed Cobber',
I have not posted for a while because the content of most discussions seem to be responding to unfounded comments from trolls and non holders.
I lose track of the conversation point behind the new threads that appear, now that I have many on ignore because they are not offering information of relevance to our cause.
What I am looking forward to is the Agenda being released for the upcoming AGM and what business shareholders may be asked to vote on, before any nominations for the Board are considered.
Could shareholders be asked to consider a TO offer ($Price per share). We can only hope more information comes to the surface later this week before/after the ICC Tribunal. I still think the only outcome for Zijin to be involved is to put forward an attractive take over offer to end this saga. China is looking to have almost full control the Lithium market in the world (if it doesn't already) and that of Rare Earth minerals. Getting hold of the biggest and highest grade deposits in the the DRC will advance that cause to the extent they can also extend their monopoly by building more Processing and refining facilities. So Zijin, stop messing around and come up with a good price that will put an end to this saga. The alternative will be to have your brand shamed on the International stage and that of Cominiere and DRC officials.
The corruption that exists within the DRC will never go away in the short term and there will still be many within Govt. looking for brown paper bags to disrupt AVZ from being able to go Mining despite our persistence in following the DRC mining code. We will never get to mine Manono without disruptions.
Lets hope one of the items of business for the AGM is to vote on a TO price per share. As shareholders we then get to decide.
Agreed, if it's looking like that route, lets sell this bitch and move on - can't wait til the AGM, hope they're held accountable
What else are they going to say, of course there going to say thisView attachment 46168
This paragraph in the financial report sounds promising...
As promising as champagne on the ice...![]()
Nah. Let’s mine the fucker.Agreed, if it's looking like that route, lets sell this bitch and move on - can't wait til the AGM, hope they're held accountable
Nah. Let’s mine the fucker.
If that's how you interpret it then you're wrong. We are currently going through a legal process and once that's sorted out in our favour off we go mining.
The DRC is lifting its game and is now in the spotlight thanks to the E.U. and the U.S. Simply put we were shafted by bad actors so there days are numbered. The MoM is on the defensive and now has to act. Simple as that.
I know you have to have the last say nut but you have no idea what you're talking about dear man with a schoolboy mentality.View attachment 46215
Your original response old boy had nothing to do with any legal processes or proceedings in relation to AVZ and was actually about/linked/and in response to the comment that the MoM reversed her position on 29 absolutely, completely, unrelated mining licences that had "actually" been "granted" and then subsequently "revoked"
So....
For the record.......
I don't think you have a fucking clue at all what's going on
I know you have to have the last say nut but you have no idea what you're talking about dear man with a schoolboy mentality.
Are you expecting them to show up ?New Countdown........yes another countdown.......but short and sweet..
View attachment 46222 .................to the start of ICC hearing
Yes. They are the claimants. Any further delays by them and the ICC will throw out their case imoAre you expecting them to show up ?
AVZ states that: "The ICC Tribunal is determining the issue of jurisdiction as a preliminary question". I interpret preliminary question as part of pre trial investigation? If so then perhaps a month? I'd like to think its faster given how idiotic the whole thing is. Wheels of justice turn SLOWLY.Am I wrong to assume the ICC hearing will be over in 2 days, but a verdict will be another one of those 3 months things which may or may not get delayed again.....?