Winenut
GO AVZ!!!!
My confidence tapered upon reading more, see page 5. on subjective opinion, versus objective.
It is not easy to escape disclosure requirements. There is no clause for “fair go”.
The “decision” dished out by a court in Lubumbashi was a verdict of the jurisdiction. Corrupt as it may well be it’s an adverse action intended to affect the progress of the company, that if I had known about in January I would have taken some shares off the table. Everyone is here, to hear the heart beat of AVZ and knows they would do same upon learning of the adverse actions of a Dathcom partner.
May be Der Geist is right, when the malfeasance and heat turned up advice was, go into suspension. When Zijin reacted on its website that must have been decisive for AVZ and fits chronology. But the Lubumbashi judgment or “decision” is not a “supposition” or “speculation” is a reasonable view to hold imo
AVZ needs to explain its reasoning.
Geez mate
Speaking for every single shareholder that they would react exactly the same as you if given a piece of information?
Really?....
Stop pulling your dick