I should have gone on to suggest the next step, which is REPLACING CATH with a new partnerBut in this case we have no money to finance the project. Finance plan is necessary for the ML and would play in the hands of our enemies who can say we don’t have everything what’s needed for the development. At this stage with all the problems with the government I’m not sure if it something good.
Not sure why CATH TIA announcing would be related to our suspension. Something is not adding up. What’s the hold up?No CATH extension announcement currently means the TIA has been mutually allowed to expire......though i would doubt this.
CATH TIA announcement of either extension or expiry therefore must be tied in with the other ASX questions being responded to if its not announced today.
Wowwwww, this whole time most of us have imagined CATL as the respectful saving grace that will do nothing but brilliant things. Imagine if they have been feeding info to Zijin...I did read a couple of days ago that CATL were on the blower to Australian lithium Companies, desperately seekingSusanSpoddy.
If I put 2 and 2 together, with the lack of CATH extension (so far) today, my calculator comes up with 24, i.e. 24% remaining with AVZ
Let's see, but if I had to dream up a good story, I'd go with AVZ not willing to go with a chinese partner anymore.
Second evil thought is: is CATH the distributor of AVZ info back to those other bastards?
Trust no-one, in fact I just blocked myself
GO WEST
24 hail Marys and definitely JMT
Till we wait for week or two, we can follow @JAG's footsteps, as I am sure it will lead us to hisone day
If you got twitter, be sure to Like and Retweet his work from time to time.
View attachment 33547
View attachment 33548
Not sure he needs to be a magician. I would have thought that as the deal had not been done they the BOD would have been looking for a Western/euo partner for the last 12 months. Especially being the best bod on the asx. Certainly as cath and z are under control of the same master. I was hoping that's why we where drilling. If cath pull the pin now the thieves have another excuse for assholeing us. Surely they would know that. But just imo. Absolutely nothing surprises me with this mob.The cancellation of the decree came without information. When the same shit happen with our cath deal I’m not sure how fast they get a new investor with all that shit that happened in the past. But maybe nigel is a magician and pull big investors out of his hat like rabbits.
Not on bird but what I've seen is realy good cheers jag and thanks.Wowwwww, this whole time most of us have imagined CATL as the respectful saving grace that will do nothing but brilliant things. Imagine if they have been feeding info to Zijin...
@JAG doing some lovely work over on the bird at the moment![]()
As long as we are not seen to have broken the deal. AVZ can hardly afford the 20m to break the contract and we know the Chinese go for the jugular. Cant see CATH saying " yeah sweet forget the 20m"I should have gone on to suggest the next step, which is REPLACING CATH with a new partner
Don’t ask, I don’t know
‘Both’ parties need to agree to extend once the extension date is up for renewal ; if either party doesn’t agree then the deal is off and both go on their way ; neither have to pay the $20m .If Cath cancel the deal, lots of problem solved. Such as $AVZ will have $20m more cash -_-
‘Both’ parties need to agree to extend once the extension date is up for renewal ; if either party doesn’t agree then the deal is off and both go on their way ; neither have to pay the $20m .
If either decided to cancel prior to the renewal date ; then that’s when payout would occur .
As we have currently passed the last extension date ; there’s no penalty for either party walking if they choose to
AVZ needs to retain 51% majority JV control….so they won’t agree to finalise the 24% to CATH until they have full and final court decision on 75% ownership. As it stands 60% is undisputed so max they would agree to sell to CATH until highest court confirms the 75% is a sale of 9% to CATH. And we are told CATH are good with that as their main requirement is guaranteed Offtake. My opinion is if that’s the case do a Offtake Prepayment Agreement and take the ownership out of the transaction and proceed with guaranteed funding based on Offtake.Why does AVZ need to agree to extend? I disagree.
What is to stop AVZ saying give us the $240m as agreed, no more extensions. The mining licence requirement has been waived. If the $240 million is not received then CATH have breached the agreement?
I think there are reasons to want to partner with CATH which is likely why AVZ have previously agreed to extend, but I don't believe AVZ have to.
View attachment 33556
Like Fuck they would stump up 240mill in this mess with no ML in hand , CATH would have an out that’s not in AVZ’s announcements that we can see for sure..Why does AVZ need to agree to extend? I disagree.
What is to stop AVZ saying give us the $240m as agreed, no more extensions. The mining licence requirement has been waived. If the $240 million is not received then CATH have breached the agreement?
I think there are reasons to want to partner with CATH which is likely why AVZ have previously agreed to extend, but I don't believe AVZ have to.
View attachment 33556
When is the best time for squid normally off that jetty?Slow news day
No squid at Brighton off the jetty mid morning today
Exit stage left CATL, enter stage right US company. Well wouldn't that be nice.I did read a couple of days ago that CATL were on the blower to Australian lithium Companies, desperately seekingSusanSpoddy.
If I put 2 and 2 together, with the lack of CATH extension (so far) today, my calculator comes up with 24, i.e. 24% remaining with AVZ
Let's see, but if I had to dream up a good story, I'd go with AVZ not willing to go with a chinese partner anymore.
Second evil thought is: is CATH the distributor of AVZ info back to those other bastards?
Trust no-one, in fact I just blocked myself
GO WEST
24 hail Marys and definitely JMT
This is exactly how it will play out.Like Fuck they would stump up 240mill in this mess with no ML in hand , CATH would have an out that’s not in AVZ’s announcements that we can see for sure..
I reckon Z and CATH would be speaking to each and have a better understanding on how to pineapple company’s together..
DP IF YOU WILL…
CATH would still be keen & it’s part of their milking system IMO…
They longer they fuck with us stalling the project the cheaper it gets unless we keep drilling etc etc & hope for a TO but when the money runs out we have a issue….
Can Nige can play poker ?
IMO if Manono was Chinese owned and operated it would be producing by now..
As old mate said which made me laugh it’s 2023 and you can identify as anything even corrupt and get away with it…
Let’s hope Marius has a Easter Egg for all of us![]()
I’m 95% sure by now he would know this but fucking around digging isn’t helping mining Manono, it may just may help with selling it but probably not seeing as we already have some crazy bullshit proven deposit…This is exactly how it will play out.
This will drag out, AVZ will have no money, they will not be able to conjure up funding without some positive news in their arsenal.
It's sad..
I'm secretly hoping AVZ have been digging around in the WA outback looking for a Manono V2.0.
Nige needs to stop the flamin digging, revert to an absolute shoe string budget and just wait it out.
I did read a couple of days ago that CATL were on the blower to Australian lithium Companies, desperately seekingSusanSpoddy.
If I put 2 and 2 together, with the lack of CATH extension (so far) today, my calculator comes up with 24, i.e. 24% remaining with AVZ
Let's see, but if I had to dream up a good story, I'd go with AVZ not willing to go with a chinese partner anymore.
Second evil thought is: is CATH the distributor of AVZ info back to those other bastards?
Trust no-one, in fact I just blocked myself
GO WEST
24 hail Marys and definitely JMT