No Fucken way would you put any trust in Penny Wong
Best foreign minister we’ve had for years.No Fucken way would you put any trust in Penny Wong
Perhaps you could give us some plain speaking clear reasons why voting in non endorsed candidates helps our position.I've been doing as much research as possible in the lead up to the AGM and the voting on the resolutions
I'm not taking this one lightly at all
I think it's absolutely imperative at this point in time to get the vote "right" and critically to get the required "numbers" we need for the best overall AVZ and shareholder outcome
First and foremost I believe the most important thing to do right now is make sure not one MMGA goon gets anywhere near a seat on the Board
Given that I am now fully supporting the nomination of the Hadleys and will absolutely be voting for both of them either online through Automic or physically at the AGM
They are serious shareholders, have plenty of skin in the game, are fully supportive of the board, can be a great asset to the board going forward and most critically can absolutely help knock out those MMGA puppets who will sell AVZ and all shareholders down the river for their own personal gain
It's taken me a good amount of time to come to this decision
I have been lucky to talk with multiple, independent, intelligent and completely unrelated sources about the situation which has really helped me form my considered opinion
I am truly grateful to all those fully invested shareholders who are working hard to get the best outcome for all of us
So the bottom line is........
This is how I will be voting and I absolutely encourage everyone to do the same
View attachment 48802
I believe this is the best way to guarantee the integrity and strength of the board now and into the future, protect us from being sold out by MMGA to corrupt foreign interests and absolutely ensure the best outcome for AVZ shareholders and the good people of Manono and the greater DRC population for many years to come
Make sure your vote counts
I appreciate the question Azz and totally understand itPerhaps you could give us some plain speaking clear reasons why voting in non endorsed candidates helps our position.
I've been asking around yet can't find any good reason why it's a good idea.
Yeah mate, I've been asking around, giving people every chance to explain why but all I get is mumble, winks and no clarity at all.Just vote what the company recommends. Not that hard.
Me and mine have over 10m shares and thats how we voting.
Not one person has been able to explain how voting the Hadleys in will keep MMGA out? If the 3 stooges have enough votes to vote themselves in then they have enough votes to block.
And I hate the secret squirrel shit. The Hadleys would be of great benefit? How about they make a video and introduce themselves. How about they come on here and introduce themselves. But no, all we hear is I heard from so and so that they good guys and will help us. I dont know these fuckers from a bar of soap! Could be the nicest guys in the world, could also be on the MMGA payroll. Who knows.
I think all non indorsed individuals should of pulled their nominations when it became clear that they are actually causing the company some stress.
All imo
I've been doing as much research as possible in the lead up to the AGM and the voting on the resolutions
I'm not taking this one lightly at all
I think it's absolutely imperative at this point in time to get the vote "right" and critically to get the required "numbers" we need for the best overall AVZ and shareholder outcome
First and foremost I believe the most important thing to do right now is make sure not one MMGA goon gets anywhere near a seat on the Board
Given that I am now fully supporting the nomination of the Hadleys and will absolutely be voting for both of them either online through Automic or physically at the AGM
They are serious shareholders, have plenty of skin in the game, are fully supportive of the board, can be a great asset to the board going forward and most critically can absolutely help knock out those MMGA puppets who will sell AVZ and all shareholders down the river for their own personal gain
It's taken me a good amount of time to come to this decision
I have been lucky to talk with multiple, independent, intelligent and completely unrelated sources about the situation which has really helped me form my considered opinion
I am truly grateful to all those fully invested shareholders who are working hard to get the best outcome for all of us
So the bottom line is........
This is how I will be voting and I absolutely encourage everyone to do the same
View attachment 48802
I believe this is the best way to guarantee the integrity and strength of the board now and into the future, protect us from being sold out by MMGA to corrupt foreign interests and absolutely ensure the best outcome for AVZ shareholders and the good people of Manono and the greater DRC population for many years to come
Make sure your vote counts
The way I see it voting for the Hadley's won't stop MMGA getting on the board. Nominees are considered in order. So if Hadley's and MMGA both somehow get up they will fill the 5 vacant board seats and the rules say the rest of the nominees will be considered defeated.Perhaps you could give us some plain speaking clear reasons why voting in non endorsed candidates helps our position.
I've been asking around yet can't find any good reason why it's a good idea.
Thanks for that mate.I appreciate the question Azz and totally understand it
Keeping our board united and focused on the best outcome for AVZ shareholders and the good people of the DRC is what it's all about
In plain speaking the Hadleys can definitely contribute in a positive way and importantly assist in keeping the board free of fracturing and self interested parties the likes of MMGA etc
Thanks for that mate.
But it needs to be explained how they would do these things.
Winenut - your explanation is as convincing as voting for the "Yes" Campaign - "its the right thing to do"I appreciate the question Azz and totally understand it
Keeping our board united and focused on the best outcome for AVZ shareholders and the good people of the DRC is what it's all about
In plain speaking the Hadleys can definitely contribute in a positive way and importantly assist in keeping the board free of fracturing and self interested parties the likes of MMGA etc
Just vote what the company recommends. Not that hard.
Me and mine have over 10m shares and thats how we voting.
Not one person has been able to explain how voting the Hadleys in will keep MMGA out? If the 3 stooges have enough votes to vote themselves in then they have enough votes to block.
And I hate the secret squirrel shit. The Hadleys would be of great benefit? How about they make a video and introduce themselves. How about they come on here and introduce themselves. But no, all we hear is I heard from so and so that they good guys and will help us. I dont know these fuckers from a bar of soap! Could be the nicest guys in the world, could also be on the MMGA payroll. Who knows.
I think all non indorsed individuals should of pulled their nominations when it became clear that they are actually causing the company some stress.
All imo
Totally agreed Mr PhotocopierIt is possible for 5 nominees plus the 2 up for reelection to be appointed provided they have >50%
That would result in a Board of 9, the maximum allowed by the current constitution
Next years AGM will be very uneventful for anyone trying to take seats, as only 1 will be up for contesting, and that’s a reelection, so no extra vacancies. An EGM would be the only way to challenge and Leonard failed miserably with this as their first initiative
Just my line of reasoning, could be miles off
The Hadleys have decent skin in the game - as good a reason as any to focus on them as the blockers
I’m not endorsing this approach by the way. There will be many thousands of non engaged voters who will follow the endorsed path, so getting 5 up will be difficult
Sorry about that!!Winenut - your explanation is as convincing as voting for the "Yes" Campaign - "its the right thing to do"
Sorry mate but I dont know who they are and I am following the direction of the BOD.
Regards,
SilentOne
All good points I would have reasoned Mr PhotocopierIt is possible for 5 nominees plus the 2 up for reelection to be appointed provided they have >50%
That would result in a Board of 9, the maximum allowed by the current constitution
Next years AGM will be very uneventful for anyone trying to take seats, as only 1 will be up for contesting, and that’s a reelection, so no extra vacancies. An EGM would be the only way to challenge and Leonard failed miserably with this as their first initiative
Just my line of reasoning, could be miles off
The Hadleys have decent skin in the game - as good a reason as any to focus on them as the blockers
I’m not endorsing this approach by the way. There will be many thousands of non engaged voters who will follow the endorsed path, so getting 5 up will be difficult
Full respect there SilentOneWinenut - your explanation is as convincing as voting for the "Yes" Campaign - "its the right thing to do"
Sorry mate but I dont know who they are and I am following the direction of the BOD.
Regards,
SilentOne