dollarbills
Regular
What do people make of this post.. It seems that the political mess is far from being resolved anytime soon.. Could Locke be waiting for more clarity on formation of government etc.?
A good thought but I doubt we would be able to list on ASX as misleading statements put management up against disclosure laws. They can’t say “spurious in nature”. (Edit) as it appears at the moment that The claims had deep and true grounding in fact. Not that they weren’t corrupt or manipulative but they certainly are not spurious claims until proven to be by the awarding of an ML, which leaves them basically on the books misleading shareholders. Additionally they don’t have strong legal title over the mine anymore. Not trying to be a downer. But I think we are going down with the ship. I hope Nigel has the stones to buy us all a pint and apologiseWouldn't AVZ leave the option to trade again open (CR ) in the event other options fail ? The new dead line for Locke takes us into delisting territory . Surely trading again is being considered a last resort if needed .
We would be too late to relist by that deadline considering the hoops to jump through in order to be ASX-compliant again would we not?Wouldn't AVZ leave the option to trade again open (CR ) in the event other options fail ? The new dead line for Locke takes us into delisting territory . Surely trading again is being considered a last resort if needed .
Their Chinese masters are teaching them the ways....Locke is potentially awaiting outcome of Fat Tail court case, as the court case was meant to be done and dusted by now, but Fat Tail have delayed it 2 or 3 times now. Next court date is scheduled for this Thursday
We relist now we won’t be worth 20mil in a monthWouldn't AVZ leave the option to trade again open (CR ) in the event other options fail ? The new dead line for Locke takes us into delisting territory . Surely trading again is being considered a last resort if needed .
Surely the board just buy up all the shares if they actually believe in the company to protect it from evil groupsWe relist now we won’t be worth 20mil in a month
Tommy,A good thought but I doubt we would be able to list on ASX as misleading statements put management up against disclosure laws. They can’t say “spurious in nature”. (Edit) as it appears at the moment that The claims had deep and true grounding in fact. Not that they weren’t corrupt or manipulative but they certainly are not spurious claims until proven to be by the awarding of an ML, which leaves them basically on the books misleading shareholders. Additionally they don’t have strong legal title over the mine anymore. Not trying to be a downer. But I think we are going down with the ship. I hope Nigel has the stones to buy us all a pint and apologise
In all honestly they are one and the same imo. What do you think happens to a company on the ASX with no money, 4B shares on issue and no clearly defined asset?If it came down to it , is trading better than extinction ?
He would have been pretty stupid if he would have said we are not working on that.When asked in January when do we start trading Graeme Johnston replied ," We are working on it ."
The size of the fines are already substantial . Locke will want to be assured they are enforceable .
You are again correct, i always forget that the DRC are contravening their own law for this insanity. It’s such a wild reality I keep using logic to justify my position but fail to recognise this govt exists outside of it! Wild times. Play out indeed. Wise words.My thoughts are the announcements were based on the laws of the DRC and the belief that they would be enforced. I dont believe the Board would have known that the shenanigans that have gone on would have had legs.