Hey Dave thanks very much for reposting that info. I did open and flick through the ICC Partial Award document last week when you were replying to Muks but i pretty much just looked at the damages amounts on page 25.I went over my reply to @muks last week and added a few things in this post that hopefully provides something to stay focused on
ICC Decision Against Cominière to Liquidate an Accrued Penalty of €39M in ENG & FRE
https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...de+Courtoisie+de+la+Sentence+Partielle_en.pdf
Page 25 shows the damages of US$9.417billion resulting from Cominiere violating AVZ’s FROR, then illegally terminating the Dathcom joint venture (due to parties not getting along) and the DRC (Ministry of Mines & CAMI) revoking AVZ’s Mining Decree (PR/PE) and granting a PR/PE to Manono Lithium with the implausible and illegal reason being it took too long for Dathcom to advance the project.
The ‘Damages’ of over US$9.417billion are what is being claimed in the ICSID by AVZ through DLA Piper
![]()
To date, the DRC has violated the orders handed down by the ICSID and AVZ has won all cases before the ICC Court of Arbitration and this recent decision (shown above), by the ICC ordered Cominiere to pay AVZ penalties of €39million (equal to US$46million or AU$70million).
In reading your explanation above i came to realise the cases are very closely linked addressing different elements of the same problem
I was just focused on the ICSID when ICC is i think just as important and an integral part of catching all the bad actors in our little drama