Dave Evans
Regular
August old boy putting the boot in over on X
View attachment 87861
View attachment 87862
View attachment 87863
He hates Share holders calling for fair compensation . Thinks we should accept whatever crumbs are thrown our way and be grateful .
Perhaps someone should remind Augie that international investors (including the US) don’t want to invest in a country that doesn’t abide by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) rules.
What about all the talk of mechanisms around transparency, accountability, traceability, reliability and de-risking mineral supply chains and other legal frameworks for investors!
Not to mention all the agreements around independent economic audits and anti-corruption mechanisms to monitor mineral supply chains, infrastructure projects, and any future economic agreements between the Parties, as set out in the Regional Economic Integration Framework.
Does Augie think some sort of joint oversight committee should have greater legal authority than the ICC and ICSID. I always thought he was a wanker and I’ve always thought the best course of action was through DLA Piper.
Remember this earlier post about DLA Piper’s experience in these types of arbitration

"DLA Piper is widely regarded as one of the top global law firms for handling complex cross-border disputes, including investment treaty arbitrationand mining sector negotiations—both highly relevant to the AVZ scenario.
While specific case outcomes are often confidential, here’s what we can draw from public records and their track record:

- Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): DLA Piper has represented both investors and states in ICSID and UNCITRAL arbitrations. Their experience includes disputes over expropriation, mining licenses, and regulatory interference—core issues in AVZ’s claim against the DRC.
- Mining & Energy Sector Expertise: The firm has advised on resource nationalization disputes, joint venture breakdowns, and permit revocations, often in Africa and Latin America.
- Settlement Strategy: DLA Piper emphasizes early dispute resolution where possible, using mediation, structured negotiations, and hybrid settlement frameworks—similar to the KoBold-AVZ framework.

- Vedanta Resources v. Zambia: DLA Piper advised Vedanta in a dispute over the seizure of a copper mine. The case involved ICSID arbitration and complex negotiations with the Zambian government.
- Tethyan Copper Company v. Pakistan: While not directly involved, DLA Piper has cited this case in its publications as a benchmark for large-scale mining arbitration, showcasing their familiarity with billion-dollar claims.
- Confidential African Mining Dispute: In a matter involving a revoked mining license in West Africa, DLA Piper reportedly helped secure a favorable settlement through a combination of arbitration and diplomatic engagement.

Given DLA Piper’s deep bench of arbitration specialists, sector-specific knowledge, and experience navigating political risk, they are well-positioned to negotiate a favorable outcome for AVZ—whether through a KoBold-facilitated settlement or a full ICSID ruling.
Perhaps if the DRC want to continue to try and screw us, we should just go back to exposing their corruption. There’s plenty of facts and evidence if anyone wants to have a look in this link below


Ongoing Corruption Makes International Investment Dangerous In The DRC
Why the DRC is too dangerous to invest in and why the DRC won’t prosper while corruption continues under the protection of the President and corrupt officials Corruption in the DRC has remained under the Tshisekedi government. The DRC government and mining sectors are rife with bribes...

Last edited: