Off to spec savers next week with the rest of us.I can see a massive IP deal coming next week!
Honest!
Please believe me, I can see it!!
View attachment 88100
Off to spec savers next week with the rest of us.I can see a massive IP deal coming next week!
Honest!
Please believe me, I can see it!!
View attachment 88100
Yes I plan to send several different posts to IR and BRN to show what other companies are doing.. although I feel it's a waste of time, as that's exactly what Lancaster Grove should be doing (eg advising BRN on how to make announcements that won't get them in strife!Maybe send that ann to Antonio!
... but I didn't inhale!!!!DJI is the largest drone manufacturer in the World, so would be great to be involved, but seeing as they're Chinese, I don't think it's likely..
"Skydio is the leading U.S. drone manufacturer and world leader in autonomous flight technology"
Anduril, is probably a good bet for our tech, in "their" various land/sea/air military drone technologies, but seeing as they have a philosophy of being able to easily outsource the production of their products, I can see Skydio (not to be confused with a high Dio) as being a recipient of US government funds, to bolster "their" Enterprise..
As well as Skydio itself, looks like a perfect fit for our technology, seeing as they already claim to be "World leaders" in autonomous flight..
BrainChip, would have purposely used, a "generic" DJI drone, as using a Skydio one, would literally "spill the beans"..
View attachment 88099
And we wouldn't want any unnecessary excitement here, would we...
Edit... Of course Dallas's post, on chips to China, now possibly opens the door to DJI, but we would be well behind there, as we wouldn't have been able to entertain that prospect earlier..
Not keen on dealing with China anyway..
Drama Queen!!, like a chicken sit on it and wait. The company will grow and prosper without continual updates. It seems that a post like this shows a negative view to your investment decision. If you can't sleep at night it's time to sellHi @TECH ,
I'm afraid I agree with the general consensus - that the excuses from BrainChip’s Board are starting to wear thin. So thin, in fact, they’re practically invisible at this point.
If Weebit can issue non-price-sensitive announcements, why can’t BrainChip? The only logical explanation for me is that the Board fears these partnerships are too fragile to even support a basic market update.
It’s time for some serious reflection.
Has anyone here actually received a response from the new IR team? Because I haven’t seen a single person say they’ve heard anything.
Have we found ourselves in a situation where the new IR team is somehow even less communicative than the old one-person setup?
The time for excuses is over.
Let's not forget that we are the ones who’ve kept the faith. We’ve supported this company through its formative years, weathered the seemingly endless delays, and defended it when it mattered.
We’re not asking for miracles, just a basic level of respect and transparency.
Surely, a good-faith attempt at proper communication is not too much to expect.
After-all Antonio admitted at the AGM that the hesitancy to announce anything was due to his own overly-conservative approach and he gave assurances that something would be done to improve this In future.
You stated "Brainchip continues making forward strides". But how can we trust this is true if so little is being officially reported and communication with shareholders has become virtually nonexistent?
Feature | Traditional Computing | Neuromorphic Computing |
Architecture | Von Neumann | Brain-inspired (Non-Von Neumann) |
Processing | Sequential | Parallel |
Power Consumption | High | Ultra-low |
Learning | Offline (Cloud-based) | On-chip, real-time |
Efficiency | Limited for real-world dynamics | Optimized for dynamic environments |
Do you come here often?Drama Queen!!, like a chicken sit on it and wait. The company will grow and prosper without continual updates. It seems that a post like this shows a negative view to your investment decision. If you can't sleep at night it's time to sell
On your next post you will explain that you are already 10 year invested and aktive on TSE…Drama Queen!!, like a chicken sit on it and wait. The company will grow and prosper without continual updates. It seems that a post like this shows a negative view to your investment decision. If you can't sleep at night it's time to sell
"Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company."
One enormous problem with your comments, this is not a private company that belongs to Antonio, this is a publicly listed company, it belongs to ALL shareholders. He doesn't get to decide...
This is clearly your opinion only and not Antonio's, as we can all see from Sean and Antonio's comments at the AGM this year..
Firstly from Sean at the AGM..., As we look into 25, our focus is laser sharp on 4 critical objectives, Objective Three, improve our investor relations to give stakeholders clear, transparent and top tier communication that reflect our commitment to shareholder engagement.
And from Antonio at the AGM - If we do a deal with customer A, right, trust me, Brainchip has no problem at all, right, trying to get information out, whether it be to the ASX or to the general market that we did business with Customer A, we absolutely want to do that. It, it promotes our brand, it shows the market that more people are utilizing our technology. It makes shareholders happy.
We have a relationship with the ASX. We've talked to the ASX. We have made it clear to the ASX how we do business. Right. And we will absolutely, when something we deem is truly material to the shareholders, we will absolutely put it on ASX. We understand that obligation.
And it is an active discussion at the board in terms of how we can fulfill non price sensitive announcements. That message has been heard. Look, I'll fall on the sword, right? Given the history of the company, I have swung whoops, apologies, I have swung the pendulum the other way in terms of being conservative, right? I don't want to get the company into trouble. I'm being too conservative.
I'll take the heat. Please shoot all arrows at me. Not my fellow board members, not Sean, that is Antonio. I'm too conservative, right?
I'm gonna fix that. I will fix that.
---------------------------------------------
It's amazing that any shareholder would try and excuse or justify Antonio's (and the company's) behaviour that is hurting the company and the share price.
“I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not.”Nice post, and yes "Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company." that's 100% my opinion, which is what this forum is all about, opinions and facts.
This quote that you posted really sums it up in my opinion:
We have a relationship with the ASX. We've talked to the ASX. We have made it clear to the ASX how we do business. Right. And we will absolutely, when something we deem is truly material to the shareholders, we will absolutely put it on ASX. We understand that obligation.
"We deem is truly material"....and that appears to be the real stumbling block, our company just can't make up earnings figures, it's such an immature business model (the edge AI market) it would currently be, pure guesswork, that's how a one-eyed believer views
the situation.
I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not.
Anyway, I'll finish there.........cheers Tech.
"I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not."Nice post, and yes "Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company." that's 100% my opinion, which is what this forum is all about, opinions and facts.
This quote that you posted really sums it up in my opinion:
We have a relationship with the ASX. We've talked to the ASX. We have made it clear to the ASX how we do business. Right. And we will absolutely, when something we deem is truly material to the shareholders, we will absolutely put it on ASX. We understand that obligation.
"We deem is truly material"....and that appears to be the real stumbling block, our company just can't make up earnings figures, it's such an immature business model (the edge AI market) it would currently be, pure guesswork, that's how a one-eyed believer views
the situation.
I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not.
Anyway, I'll finish there.........cheers Tech.
"I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not."
I think that if the share price was $1.50 again, then there would have been news issued in some form. imo
Hi @Rskiff, like you, some would argue, quite reasonably, that our current share price is not just an unfortunate anomaly. Rather, that the reason it's sitting nowhere near $1.50 is it’s a direct byproduct of the company’s persistent lack of material announcements. And therein lies the core issue IMO.
In a market driven by clarity and forward-looking signals, prolonged silence from a company - especially one working on cutting-edge technology like ours, breeds uncertainty, which fosters hesitation among potential investors and angst among existing shareholders.
I genuinely believe our product is world-class, and some of our partnerships appear to be extremely promising. The potential here is enormous. But if that promise isn’t regularly and confidently reinforced through formal communication, the market tends to assume the worst - or at best, assumes nothing is happening at all.
Without regular validation through updates, even non-price-sensitive announcements - the story simply fades away, along with the share price.
Some may not agree with my view on this, and that’s perfectly fine. We’re all entitled to our opinions. Ideally, we should be mature enough to hear differing perspectives respectfully and with an open mind.
I note @jrp173's earlier post regarding the AGM, where Antonio reportedly said, “It is an active discussion at the board in terms of how we can fulfil non price sensitive announcements.”
And @Diogenese, whose contributions I always respect, mentioned earlier that “the company has taken advice and undertaken consultation on the subject.”
Hopefully these matters are being discussed in depth and that the right advice is being sought to bridge the communication gap, for the benefit of all shareholders.
Nice post, and yes "Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company." that's 100% my opinion, which is what this forum is all about, opinions and facts.
This quote that you posted really sums it up in my opinion:
We have a relationship with the ASX. We've talked to the ASX. We have made it clear to the ASX how we do business. Right. And we will absolutely, when something we deem is truly material to the shareholders, we will absolutely put it on ASX. We understand that obligation.
"We deem is truly material"....and that appears to be the real stumbling block, our company just can't make up earnings figures, it's such an immature business model (the edge AI market) it would currently be, pure guesswork, that's how a one-eyed believer views
the situation.
I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not.
Anyway, I'll finish there.........cheers Tech.
Afternoon Bravo ,Hi @Rskiff, like you, some would argue, quite reasonably, that our current share price is not just an unfortunate anomaly. Rather, that the reason it's sitting nowhere near $1.50 is a direct byproduct of the company’s persistent lack of material announcements. And therein lies the core issue IMO.
In a market driven by clarity and forward-looking signals, prolonged silence from a company - especially one working on cutting-edge technology like ours, breeds uncertainty, which fosters hesitation among potential investors and angst among existing shareholders.
I genuinely believe our product is world-class, and some of our partnerships appear to be extremely promising. The potential here is enormous. But if that promise isn’t regularly and confidently reinforced through formal communication, the market tends to assume the worst - or at best, assumes nothing is happening at all.
Without regular validation through updates, even non-price-sensitive announcements - the story simply fades away, along with the share price.
Some may not agree with my view on this, and that’s perfectly fine. We’re all entitled to our opinions. Ideally, we should be mature enough to hear differing perspectives respectfully and with an open mind.
I note @jrp173's earlier post regarding the AGM, where Antonio reportedly said, “It is an active discussion at the board in terms of how we can fulfil non price sensitive announcements.”
And @Diogenese, whose contributions I always respect, mentioned earlier that “the company has taken advice and undertaken consultation on the subject.”
Hopefully these matters are being discussed in depth and that the right advice is being sought to bridge the communication gap, for the benefit of all shareholders.
I don’t think you understand. It’s not about the share price being at 20 cents or $1.50.“I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not.”
There will always be people who jump in at the all-time high…and if it drops just 10 cents, the same conversations start again.
Same with short-term thinking… you’ll find that attitude everywhere.
In fact, it’s the same with Tesla, Mercedes, Amazon… there’s always someone complaining, no matter how good the fundamentals are.
But some people .. like me
even I am an Professor Emeritus of Emotional Stability & Certified HODL Philosopher
… just want to let off some steam sometimes.
We had expectations, and the price is simply what it is right now. It’s frustrating.
I think it’s important to distinguish:
Is the criticism just coming from human weakness, from someone who’s been waiting and just wants to finally be rewarded?
Or is it malicious, just trying to stir up negativity because they have nothing better to do?
Just my opinion.