HopalongPetrovski
I'm Spartacus!
Different people from different backgrounds with different interests providing their viewpoints is healthy debate and more likely to throw up and perhaps even generate new knowledge.
That this may involve others having a different view from you, I or even a majority should not be seen as threatening or even as a negative.
Rather, I see it as adding depth to our discussion.
This, the BRN DISCUSSION ONGOING thread is from what I can see the General Thread for all things BRN and so should have the broadest reach and be the least proscribed and restricted.
Mere polite criticism should be able to be discussed and tolerated as part of this discussion ongoing as a relevant concern to an investor and should be able to be argued politely by those who wish to prosecute a view either way.
If some find others viewpoints disturbing I understand they have a right to report them, as I have done on a couple of occasions when new posters launched blatantly obvious attacks or invoked vile accusations towards other posters here, or on the company or its officers.
However, I hope and trust that the mechanism is not too sensitively triggered and has enough intelligence built in to it to also monitor the reporters so its power is not pervertedly used to persecute upon the mere whim of the aggrieved.
One would hope a reasonable threshold has to be reached before action is taken and if any singular or small group of repeat reporters becomes evident this then is made known to the larger group.
I don't think any version of a Star Chamber or other fascist paraphernalia is welcome to the majority here.
That this may involve others having a different view from you, I or even a majority should not be seen as threatening or even as a negative.
Rather, I see it as adding depth to our discussion.
This, the BRN DISCUSSION ONGOING thread is from what I can see the General Thread for all things BRN and so should have the broadest reach and be the least proscribed and restricted.
Mere polite criticism should be able to be discussed and tolerated as part of this discussion ongoing as a relevant concern to an investor and should be able to be argued politely by those who wish to prosecute a view either way.
If some find others viewpoints disturbing I understand they have a right to report them, as I have done on a couple of occasions when new posters launched blatantly obvious attacks or invoked vile accusations towards other posters here, or on the company or its officers.
However, I hope and trust that the mechanism is not too sensitively triggered and has enough intelligence built in to it to also monitor the reporters so its power is not pervertedly used to persecute upon the mere whim of the aggrieved.
One would hope a reasonable threshold has to be reached before action is taken and if any singular or small group of repeat reporters becomes evident this then is made known to the larger group.
I don't think any version of a Star Chamber or other fascist paraphernalia is welcome to the majority here.