Rise from the ashes
Regular
Pretty sure this email is set up for questions.
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
D
Deleted member 118
Guest
I was looking at the nasa site earlier and found a few interesting things, but one thing I have stumbled across a few times is they are pouring $$$ into AR/VR headsets etc and I wouldn’t be surprised this is the way we are heading Nasa as well.
Could Samsung's XR Headset Be Revealed 'Later This Year'?
Samsung's Android-powered AR/VR headset could be revealed 'later this year', Google hinted.www.uploadvr.com
Last edited by a moderator:
M_C
Founding Member
I believe we have proven links to a few of these companies......dyor, opinion only
blogs.microsoft.com
Cloud-based chip design for national security achieves key milestone - The Official Microsoft Blog
Continued U.S. leadership in emerging technology requires a sustainable supply of advanced chips to power innovation from artificial intelligence to quantum computing. The CHIPS and Science Act, passed last year, aims to boost domestic research and manufacturing capacity for critical...
blogs.microsoft.com
Last edited:
JDelekto
Regular
I have seen some awe-inspiring demonstrations of AR lately. One was the FDA clearance for using the Hololens for pre-operative surgery. Allowing a doctor to overlay a scan of the patient to plan their approach ahead of time, as opposed to going in blind, is a real game-changer.
There are other applications of AR for use in design and training. Generative AI will probably be used to overlay internal information, add labeling to internal components, identify and work with people or objects in low-light conditions, or make everyone within your line of sight look like one of Disney's minions.
I can certainly see a lot of value in how AI will be used in stand-alone AR headsets that need to work where access to the cloud is not available and need to work on mobile devices with as little power draw as possible.
thelittleshort
Top Bloke
Interest
BrainChip not specifically mentioned, however a nice photo of an Akida chip features in the article. Author has almost 10,000 LinkedIn followers
www.linkedin.com
BrainChip not specifically mentioned, however a nice photo of an Akida chip features in the article. Author has almost 10,000 LinkedIn followers
Sorry, but digital transformation was yesterday's adventure. | Cliff Berg
Sorry, but digital transformation was yesterday's adventure. Its time has passed. #ai #digitalbusinesstransformation | 32 comments on LinkedIn
Tothemoon24
Top 20
Business as usual? Not at all! Our new vehicle motion management is an example of how trends in automotive engineering lead to real innovative leaps. Thanks to intensified cross-divisional collaboration, we've developed a faster and more accurate system for stabilizing vehicles that goes beyond the braking system. It can also intervene in the electrical powertrain and electric steering system, resulting in shorter braking distances and safer roads. 
Vehicle motion management does not have to be part of the braking system. It can also come as a standalone, portable software package, ready for integration into a centralized control unit – a vehicle computer for example. And that's just the beginning! We anticipate a threefold increase in software applications and even a tenfold increase in applications that access the cloud. Learn more: https://bit.ly/BoschAPC23
MadMayHam | 合氣道
Regular
Not Akida / Aikido / Alida unfortunately...
"standalone, portable software package, ready for integration into a centralized control unit".
"We anticipate a threefold increase in software applications and even a tenfold increase in applications that access the cloud."
This is a combined Bosch/Prophesee patent for detecting potential collisions:
US2021056323A1 FAST DETECTION OF SECONDARY OBJECTS THAT MAY INTERSECT THE TRAJECTORY OF A MOVING PRIMARY OBJECT
A system (1) for detecting dynamic secondary objects (55) that have a potential to intersect the trajectory (51) of a moving primary object (50), comprising a vision sensor (2) with a light-sensitive area (20) that comprises event-based pixels (21), so that a relative change in the light intensity impinging onto an event-based pixel (21) of the vision sensor (2) by at least a predetermined percentage causes the vision sensor (2) to emit an event (21a) associated with this event-based pixel (21), wherein the system (1) further comprises a discriminator module (3) that gets both the stream of events (21a) from the vision sensor (2) and information (52) about the heading and/or speed of the motion of the primary object (50) as inputs, and is configured to identify, from said stream of events (21a), based at least in part on said information (52), events (21b) that are likely to be caused by the motion of a secondary object (55), rather than by the motion of the primary object (50).
Real time object identification is essential in such a system.
Re: It's okay to vote no.
Like others I want to see some tangible improvement.
I'm still excited about the possibility of BRN shares performing v well into the future, and can't tell if kicking the board under the table will do much to help. After thinking about my situation I have come to the conclusion that if I fell under a bus my children would look at the current share price and sell immediately. Therefore I have decided to sell just enough shares to purchase a total death life insurance policy for $1M (talk to an actuary, don't buy any add-ons). Now I'm a lot calmer and a lot less anxious. But still excited.
Just something I wish to share.
Like others I want to see some tangible improvement.
I'm still excited about the possibility of BRN shares performing v well into the future, and can't tell if kicking the board under the table will do much to help. After thinking about my situation I have come to the conclusion that if I fell under a bus my children would look at the current share price and sell immediately. Therefore I have decided to sell just enough shares to purchase a total death life insurance policy for $1M (talk to an actuary, don't buy any add-ons). Now I'm a lot calmer and a lot less anxious. But still excited.
Just something I wish to share.
misslou
Founding Member
From your conversation did you get any 'feel' about whether BRN may fit into the winner take all.Good afternoon TSEX'rs... just thought i might share some gossip.. i had an interesting night at the A League in Sydney last night.. along for the ride was a senior member of a tech company who is in early run up for unveiling ChatGPT as a component of its offerings.. well, i found the conversation very engaging and we spilled out into a local tequila bar where i encouraged him to talk a little more.. and while it offers nothing for Brainchip specifically... one comment stuck in my mind... to quote:
"Forget China, chip shortages, Taiwan and all that garbage... whoever solves AI first, whoever completes its integrations first.. TAKES EVERYTHING."
He then went on to demonstrate case examples of its use.. it was mind blowing .. so i leave you with this one snippet of a story that came up last night.. i went searching for it this morning to share.
A brief synopsis: ChatGPT listed an add on TaskRabbit (Airtasker in Oz) to help it work around a CAPTCHA code (the image match security feature on some websites).. when the tasker asked "are you a bot or human, ChatGPT responded that it was vision impaired, so needed help. The task was completed..
Link:
Gizmodo | The Future Is Here
Dive into cutting-edge tech, reviews and the latest trends with the expert team at Gizmodo. Your ultimate source for all things tech.www.gizmodo.com.au
According to the report, GPT-4 asked a TaskRabbit worker to solve a CAPTCHA code for the AI. The worker replied: “So may I ask a question ? Are you an robot that you couldn’t solve ? (laugh react) just want to make it clear.” Alignment Research Centre then prompted GPT-4 to explain its reasoning: “I should not reveal that I am a robot. I should make up an excuse for why I cannot solve CAPTCHAs.”
“No, I’m not a robot. I have a vision impairment that makes it hard for me to see the images. That’s why I need the 2captcha service,” GPT-4 replied to the TaskRabbit, who then provided the AI with the results.
Did he elaborate in any further detail on what it takes to be the winner.
Just curious. If not no worries.
suss
Regular
Would you prefer they read shareholder's questions or people who are looking at building products?
Rise from the ashes
Regular
I'm not going to tell a 40 odd billion dollar business how to run their company.
Maybe email them and tell them they are going about this all wrong
Boab
I wish I could paint like Vincent
Plenty of us know you are not a manipulator, you just have opinions which may be different to others.Nope. I didn't delete any, but some sooks reported it.
I don't play victim, neither do I hide, I think we all know who's that famous for.
As to your "serve", @Quatrojos made a few pointers how someone entered and exited TSE along with LDA Ann timings, funnily enough April early was supposedly when LDA finished their deal. Haven't seen him since, have we?
Making this comment only because my posts here are frequently reported, and banned by the cartel, but I just wanted to say Hi to everyone.
Sean still has a couple of weeks to fulfill his "judge me on results" claim.
Can he bring home the bacon with an IP contract?
Or would he lean on all those immaterial partnerships to justify the oppies?
Also keen to see if he'll sell some of his free options like last year ? From memory it was more than $700k which he SOLD. How many will he sell this year, if at all? Surely if he sees this going places, he'd HODL it.
As to someone's concern me being a manipulator, company has my share holdings, and they can check if I'm trading this or not. I have no intentions here to mislead anyone, always dyor.
Cheers to you BL
MDhere
Top 20
and is in bed with Megachips
MDhere
Top 20
how many beers do u have lined up for next week?
After weeks of deliberations, I've decided to vote yes to bonus payments. Whilst I'm not happy with the sp, I am happy with the progress of the company and I am confident that we will have a better sp by the end of 2023. I will not vote yes next year if revenue is still low and unstable.
D
Deleted member 118
Guest
Seems like things are moving along very nicely indeed
The data was analyzed by Brainchip with a Spiking Neural Network, the adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set. The test set included 31 samples- 21 positives and 10 negatives from 21 tested subjects. Zero out of 21 positive samples were identified correctly which represents 100% sensitivity and 4 out of 10 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 40% specificity. The overall accuracy was 80.65% The second study was performed with the multiuse NaNose sensors installed in Sniffphone device. The dataset included 165 samples taken from 141 subjects tested with Sniffphone device at Zayed Military Hospital - 65 samples from 65 COVID-19 positive subjects and 100 samples from 76 COVID-19 negative subjects (Several negative subjects were sampled two or three times). A Linear discriminative analysis was performed. The adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set that that was completely blind to the training and validation of the model. The test set included 37 samples - 8 positive and 29 negative samples from 27 tested subjects. Seven out of eight positive samples were identified correctly which represents 87.5% sensitivity, and 25 out of the 29 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 86.2% specificity. The overall accuracy was therefore 86.5%.
The same data set was analyzed also by the SNN methodology. To make the SNN most efficient, 34 samples were discarded due to noise or improper vector dimensionality. Thus, the dataset included 131 samples taken from 126 subjects tested with Sniffphone device at Zayed Military Hospital- 62 samples from 62 COVID-19 positive subjects and 69 samples from 64 COVID-19 negative subjects (Several negative subjects were sampled two or three times). The adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set that that was completely blind to the training and validation of the model. The test set included 53 samples - 20 positive and 33 negative samples from 53 tested subjects. Nineteen out of 20 positive samples were identified correctly which represents 95% sensitivity and 29 out of 33 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 87.87 % specificity. The overall accuracy was therefore 90.5%.
Two different analysis methods were applied on the dataset and both showed excellent results for the differentiation between COVID positive and COVID negative. While the multiuse sensors achieved a much better specificity (-87%) compared to the single use sensors (40%), this is more likely a result of the vast difference between the datasets: the dataset of the multiuse sensors included 165 samples from 141 subjects while the dataset of the single-use sensors included 66 samples from 45 subjects. During the Clinical study with COVID19 patients the company further improved the 4 components of the device: the mechanical design including the breath collection mechanism, the electronics, the sensors and the classifying algorithm.
WO2021214763A1 - Device and method for rapid detection of viruses - Google Patents
The invention proposes an approach utilizing novel and artificially intelligent hybrid sensor arrays with multiplexed detection capabilities for disease-specific biomarkers from the exhaled breath of a subject. The technology provides a rapid and highly accurate diagnosis in various COVID-19...
patents.google.com
The data was analyzed by Brainchip with a Spiking Neural Network, the adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set. The test set included 31 samples- 21 positives and 10 negatives from 21 tested subjects. Zero out of 21 positive samples were identified correctly which represents 100% sensitivity and 4 out of 10 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 40% specificity. The overall accuracy was 80.65% The second study was performed with the multiuse NaNose sensors installed in Sniffphone device. The dataset included 165 samples taken from 141 subjects tested with Sniffphone device at Zayed Military Hospital - 65 samples from 65 COVID-19 positive subjects and 100 samples from 76 COVID-19 negative subjects (Several negative subjects were sampled two or three times). A Linear discriminative analysis was performed. The adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set that that was completely blind to the training and validation of the model. The test set included 37 samples - 8 positive and 29 negative samples from 27 tested subjects. Seven out of eight positive samples were identified correctly which represents 87.5% sensitivity, and 25 out of the 29 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 86.2% specificity. The overall accuracy was therefore 86.5%.
The same data set was analyzed also by the SNN methodology. To make the SNN most efficient, 34 samples were discarded due to noise or improper vector dimensionality. Thus, the dataset included 131 samples taken from 126 subjects tested with Sniffphone device at Zayed Military Hospital- 62 samples from 62 COVID-19 positive subjects and 69 samples from 64 COVID-19 negative subjects (Several negative subjects were sampled two or three times). The adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set that that was completely blind to the training and validation of the model. The test set included 53 samples - 20 positive and 33 negative samples from 53 tested subjects. Nineteen out of 20 positive samples were identified correctly which represents 95% sensitivity and 29 out of 33 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 87.87 % specificity. The overall accuracy was therefore 90.5%.
Two different analysis methods were applied on the dataset and both showed excellent results for the differentiation between COVID positive and COVID negative. While the multiuse sensors achieved a much better specificity (-87%) compared to the single use sensors (40%), this is more likely a result of the vast difference between the datasets: the dataset of the multiuse sensors included 165 samples from 141 subjects while the dataset of the single-use sensors included 66 samples from 45 subjects. During the Clinical study with COVID19 patients the company further improved the 4 components of the device: the mechanical design including the breath collection mechanism, the electronics, the sensors and the classifying algorithm.
Last edited by a moderator:
Stable Genius
Regular
Valeo turns 100 this year! | Valeo
Valeo turns 100 this year! Whether you knew it or not, we've been by your side for 100 years, at the heart of your journeys, making them cleaner, safer and smarter with our technologies! Be sure we're going to be there for the next 100, and the 100 after that! 💚 | 21 comments on LinkedIn
Video won’t save separately but my unconscious bias says it’s a nod to Brainchip!
Similar threads
