BRN Discussion Ongoing

Stockbob

Regular
Flop to me when you cannot recover the cost of product from the sale of product. There was no strategy, no orders etc.
That leads into LDN termination. Now if the present management delivers the same way that will be a termination of a lot of faith and wealth invested by long term holders.
Akida 1000 was to prove the concept in silicon, this has been said so many times over. So what are you saying comp shouldn't have released akida 1000 ? and how do you expect to take the feedback and improve ? and how can you say costs are not recovered, renesas is going to be releasing thier chip based on akida 1000 soon and megachips also have bought a license for the same , how can you say no orders :)
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 22 users

Mccabe84

Regular
Flop to me when you cannot recover the cost of product from the sale of product. There was no strategy, no orders etc.
That leads into LDN termination. Now if the present management delivers the same way that will be a termination of a lot of faith and wealth invested by long term holders.
- Amazon 9 years till made a profit
- Tesla 17 years
Just to mention a couple. Are these companies flops too. BRNs first generation (A1000) is around 2 years old.. new tech takes time
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 42 users

Mccabe84

Regular

How long has GMAC Intelligence been on BRNs partner page ? Anyway enough post from me for the day..
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 9 users

Damo4

Regular
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 17 users

Vladsblood

Regular
Volume going up SP going down fast …well management did say they will let SP take care of itself…good job. Info us on Nasdaq stance at the very least PLEASE
SOS to FF please mate give us your view on current position. Vlad
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 8 users

rgupta

Regular
I agree 100% tech takes time to establish but here the question is how you plan and implement things.
On the time frames brn is more than 12 years old as well and still no profits.

The other point I want to raise here is every good product cannot be a success just because it is a good product. We you give a good product to bad manager they can kill the product. That is why I never consider a product is a success until it is a success.
My understanding is one more failure can be detrimental. I had invested in brn with high risk reward ratio and will wait longer than anyone else. But got frustrated when management keep on changing wordings.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 4 users

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
One can only wonder if these technological highlights and amazing announcements will include the additional information that Markus was going to deliver on his second LinkedIn blog about neuromorphic computing.

Also, it'd be great to hear a bit more about the "systems" (plural) that Mercedes have said they've been working on with our technology.



Screen Shot 2023-08-28 at 12.43.32 pm.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 21 users

rgupta

Regular
Wot? We mainly sell IP.. so not sure what your on about. Seems like Renesas, Megachips, NASA, Edge Impulse and alot of others are fine using it. So errrr.

Its robust enough for ANT61 to wanna send into space as well.
If that is the case then why cannot we sell enough chips to recover our cost ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Rskiff

Regular
If that is the case then why cannot we sell enough chips to recover our cost ?
maybe because BRN is a IP company now, not in the chip producing model
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users

IloveLamp

Top 20
Cheif scientist at BRN likes it and not for the first time....

Something tells me perhaps the new "analog" ai chip from ibm may not be that analog......

Screenshot_20230828_125358_LinkedIn.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users
Cheif scientist at BRN likes it and not for the first time....

Something tells me perhaps the new "analog" ai chip from ibm may not be that analog......

View attachment 43171
I have layman's doubt that an analog or combination analog/digital chip, will ever be able to be developed to the extent, of a purely digital design, which we have by the balls..
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 10 users

Mccabe84

Regular
I agree 100% tech takes time to establish but here the question is how you plan and implement things.
On the time frames brn is more than 12 years old as well and still no profits.

The other point I want to raise here is every good product cannot be a success just because it is a good product. We you give a good product to bad manager they can kill the product. That is why I never consider a product is a success until it is a success.
My understanding is one more failure can be detrimental. I had invested in brn with high risk reward ratio and will wait longer than anyone else. But got frustrated when management keep on changing wordings.
BRN is more than 12 years old, but How old is neuromorphic technology and the first working product?

Anyway we all see things in different ways and only time will tell who’s right and who’s wrong
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users

rgupta

Regular

rgupta

Regular
BRN is more than 12 years old, but How old is neuromorphic technology and the first working product?

Anyway we all see things in different ways and only time will tell who’s right and who’s wrong
Donot take me wrong. I want you to be right as it will benefit as well. But your or my wish does not matter if the results are not delivered by the management.
I still assume it would had been better to bring akida 2000 than akida 1500 even if that means extra time.
I am worried company is launching akida 1500 just like akida 1000 in a hurry and any failure here will be detrimental.
On the positive note if company can recover the cost of akida 1500 from its sale it will be a good outcome.
 

Papacass

Regular
Harsh reality is that we could not sell enough chips or ips with akida 1000
But yes we got a line in our profile 1st neurophonic chip producer. We come in front of Intel and IBM as they cannot launch their product. The strategy only helped the day traders and shorters while the long term holders are crying.
I think you are jumping the gun re not selling enough AKD1000 IP (we don’t sell chips). Renesas is producing a product with AKD 1000 IP. Megachips also may produce something as they have a licence. Socionext and Valeo are also in the mix. We have all been educated on the design cycle. 3 to 4 years yeah? We are pretty much in the AKD 1000 sweet spot now as far as potential products go. Dry your tears and let’s see what happens.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 24 users

robsmark

Regular
Donot take me wrong. I want you to be right as it will benefit as well. But your or my wish does not matter if the results are not delivered by the management.
I still assume it would had been better to bring akida 2000 than akida 1500 even if that means extra time.
I am worried company is launching akida 1500 just like akida 1000 in a hurry and any failure here will be detrimental.
On the positive note if company can recover the cost of akida 1500 from its sale it will be a good outcome.
I think you have this a little twisted rgupta.

Akd1000 - was released to customers (primarily those in the EAP) for incorporation into their intended products.

It was also licensed by two non-EAP customers.

These EAP customers requested some changes, which have been incorporated into Akd1500, a chip that’s basically a tweaked version of the original, with the same intended uses.

Akd2000 is a different beast all together and by large would be an overkill for those originally use cases.

Similar to how all the other chip manufacturers (including ARM) have many different offerings for different applications.

The existence of one doesn’t relinquish the value of another. You wouldn’t need the same processor for AI doorbell as you would for a LiDAR system for example.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 46 users

toasty

Regular
I'm still a bit puzzled by Akida1500, mainly the reason for its existence. Did ARM ask for it so that they could continue to sell their current CPU's but add Akida on? Did Mercedes ask for it as they have decided to use one or more other CPU's and didn't see the need for another one onboard with Akida? But if we're selling IP instead of silicon how does that work? Our IP needs to go into some form of silicon for it to work doesn't it?? I may be slow but its all a little hazy for me.

An explanation from the company (in laymans terms) would, I think, calm the market. In the absence of information people tend to fill the void with fears and uncertainty.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 4 users

Labsy

Regular
I just put in an order. trying to pinch a few at 28 cents. Hopefully it will pay off in the short to medium term.
Same
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 12 users

Papacass

Regular
Also, one more thing. I’ve been a BRN share holder for 6 or 7 years now so I’m a little punchdrunk. It’s hard keeping the gloves up constantly haha. Anyway, from memory, didn’t Megachips supply some input into the AKD1500 design? So 1500 is out now. PVDM said we all underestimated the importance of the Megachips deal. Maybe PVDM’s meaning will crystallise now. I’m putting my mouth guard back in for another day on the BRN express. Onward.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 40 users

jk6199

Regular
Also, one more thing. I’ve been a BRN share holder for 6 or 7 years now so I’m a little punchdrunk. It’s hard keeping the gloves up constantly haha. Anyway, from memory, didn’t Megachips supply some input into the AKD1500 design? So 1500 is out now. PVDM said we all underestimated the importance of the Megachips deal. Maybe PVDM’s meaning will crystallise now. I’m putting my mouth guard back in for another day on the BRN express. Onward.

I think I'll just stay drunk until the price rises 🥴
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 17 users
Top Bottom