Makeme 2020
Regular
Do you need a hug

Do you need a hug
That's my issue with the forum and the reason all of my friends left months ago already.You're comment was going so well until I got to this. Seemed reasonable and then the lie. First gen wasn't a flop this has been addressed over and over.
If you're not happy with management what is your solution? How do you make the sales process faster and how do you make the giants of the tech industry buy our IP and then implement our tech in record time?
That's my issue with the forum and the reason all of my friends left months ago already.
As soon as someone does not agree, logical thinking just stops, and you get called a lier, downramper, stupid, thrown gifs at you ladididi dadidi.
A product, the only one you have, 3 years into commercialization that doesn't sell and even gets called not robust enough by its own company is a failure. End and over.
I can name you an example for a lie regarding this topic.
When the technology was ready for licensing, they said that revenue growth would outgrow expenses. They said that there will be a lot of ip licensing going forward, or other phrases liked it'd become the defacto standard.
Regarding the second gen, there was only an outdated timeline available.
I don't recall when it was, but I think it was some months maybe even only some weeks before the last AGM someone dropped that the "AKD1000 never intended to be a revenue stream"
Now that's a lie with consequences that we can all witness right now.
Can't wait for people making excuses like "he was only talking about physical chips and not IP" or whatever people will come up with.
I agree.No disrespect Tech but no one called you a "slimeball trader" as you call it. However yesterday you came on here and implied that someone was selling or trading their shares.
Quote below.
"I just wonder if some of you are buying some of FF's sharesas he does trade like many on this forum, despite what is and isn't said, but
that's fine and dandy, I CHOOSE not to sell just buy and buy when funds are available"
Now I do remember that you said over on the Crapper many moons ago that you do trade. And that's perfectly fine. More luck to you mate. It's certainly not my game even though I have tried. But if we're in the game of telling tales we might as well keep things transparent.
Also don't play the victim card you brought the reaction from me and others on yourself but unlike you I have the balls to call you out and respond to you directly.
Whatever beef you have with FF(or others) maybe you should leave it off the threads(that goes for others here too) and instead continue to offer your the good contributions and insights as what we have become accustomed to.
Lead balloon.
Down Down Down
I really think people just love to whinge… and it doesn’t matter where you look, I’m apart of the defence organisation and believe me there are some whinging people there too.Wow, 75% up on our record low (if that was 3 cents). Outstanding!
REALLY Cardpro ... who cares. What is important is our future. And that is assured. It just requires a little patience ... and not sensationalised negativity.
The share price will go up, and the share price will go down. That is a certainty. But do you have faith in the company and everything they claim ... or do you think that they and all the other companies are just making it up. I know what I believe.
Cheers, Deena
What's with all the hopeless negativity, honestly?
This......There is a post on 'the other site' saying that Brainchip has not received any takeover bid from bigger competitors despite having a world leading technology and multiple IPs.
I want to know what would be a counter argument for this?
Thanks
It's a snapshot of a Motley fool article. The question has been addressed here too way back in the thread. Just a matter of finding it unless someone wants to engage.There is a post on 'the other site' saying that Brainchip has not received any takeover bid from bigger competitors despite having a world leading technology and multiple IPs.
I want to know what would be a counter argument for this?
Thanks
I hadn't seen this.There's only so many times one person can get called out by such a vast array of hugely beneficial, contributing members of the forum.
As many would know - i've spoken at length at how unnecessary and immature the snide remarks are from the member you mention. For a period there, upon mentioning, they would stop for a few weeks / few months. But in time, those weeks and months have turned into mere days, hours or don't even register now.
A leopard never changes its spots - and i think it's clear to see, there's no getting through to him. It creates so much unwarranted negativity in what is generally an exceptional forum, with balanced but fair discussion and respect offered shared among members. And yet, he still pokes, prods, antagonises people here to the point where they no longer want to voice that opinion, offer some research, show recognition or even visit the forum full stop. I know that as i've previously had to remove myself for months at a time.
Even in exchanging direct messages, the childishness continues. The true character being displayed growing even uglier.
It's now at a point where every other page in this thread, there's a nasty exchange which then draws more attention to feed his sick ego. And that's the worst part of it all - it detracts from other valuable information being shared and members donating generous time and effort in their contributions.
Zeebot - please make it stop.
Until then, could someone more tech savvy than i assist me in blocking him? I feel loathed to even mention his name.
That's all great and it's purely you're opinion and to be perfectly honest I'm just going to cut to the chase and agree to disagree.That's my issue with the forum and the reason all of my friends left months ago already.
As soon as someone does not agree, logical thinking just stops, and you get called a lier, downramper, stupid, thrown gifs at you ladididi dadidi.
A product, the only one you have, 3 years into commercialization that doesn't sell and even gets called not robust enough by its own company is a failure. End and over.
I can name you an example for a lie regarding this topic.
When the technology was ready for licensing, they said that revenue growth would outgrow expenses. They said that there will be a lot of ip licensing going forward, or other phrases liked it'd become the defacto standard.
Regarding the second gen, there was only an outdated timeline available.
I don't recall when it was, but I think it was some months maybe even only some weeks before the last AGM someone dropped that the "AKD1000 never intended to be a revenue stream"
Now that's a lie with consequences that we can all witness right now.
Can't wait for people making excuses like "he was only talking about physical chips and not IP" or whatever people will come up with.
Yes, the lady said just foundry and not Intel foundry services so just stating as it was mentioned. Yes same thing really in reference to intel in this manner during their discussionThere's some IFS and BUTs here. Lets start with Intel Foundry Services ...
View attachment 45000
Neuromorphic Computing Market Future Opportunities and Barriers by 2030
The recently published Neuromorphic Computing Market Report 2023 spanning across106pagesand offers a comprehensive overview of its present condition, size, volume and market share. In today's world, understanding thewww.benzinga.com