BRN Discussion Ongoing

[TECH]

Good Morning,

I have to say that I agree with the posts some have made in regards to Nandan's podcast series.

He has briefly interviewed a number of market players whom all send the same type of message, that is, AI is everywhere, education
has been taking a positive form, the net has been cast wide and far to the point that the questions being put forward by inquiring parties
is endless, the scope of which is being driven by the human imagination, AI has possibly changed the human prospective to the point
where nothing is impossible anymore.

It's clear to me at least that the journey we have all been on has turned a major corner, we have all become more educated to the point
where companies are now being approached to actually design and produce a product/s, meaning things have definitely moved onto the
next phase in the business cycle, not just for us, but for all companies in this space, that has to be seen as a huge positive.

"We don't make the sensors, we make them smart"

How many years ago did Brainchip achieve all 5 modalities in silicon...oh yes, AKD 1000.

Sensors were a huge part of CES this year, we are and have always been positioned at the right place in time to succeed.

And finally, for the ones who like to moan and keep focusing on how much money they have lost on paper (but strangely enough still
hold our stock) there has been no one more patient up to this point than Peter, who has been waiting a lifetime to see his dream become
reality, but money isn't his driving passion now is it, and there within lies the problem for many.

Have a positive day ahead, be assured that we are on the right track to succeed.......just my views....Tech

 

[Fact Finder]

Hi All
Many are annoyed with dot joining.

Many are completely ambivalent to dot joining.

The whole basis of the 1,000 Eyes was a mutual love of dot joining or as I prefer to call it research.

This place was a sanctuary for those who liked to research Brainchip free from everything that is HC.

When the partnership with SiFive was announced it was made clear that Brainchip fitted into SiFive’s plans for what it calls its Intelligence Series.

Later in what to HC seemed a completely unrelated irrelevant event Microchip won a major contract with NASA.

It was then announced that Microchip had engaged with SiFive and that it would be using SiFive’s Intelligence series processors as part of the NASA contract.

Again those at HC saw no relevance in this partnering to Brainchip.

Here on TSEx however the 1,000 Eyes kept researching and in the end the research convinced me that Brainchip was most likely involved with Microchip. As HC was unable to plunge their fingers through the open wounds they derided this idea.

Then at CES 2024 it is publicly disclosed that Brainchip has had a close partnership of some long standing with Microchip and are demonstrating a combination technology which will be taken to Microchip’s customers.

Those who want to be critical of those who maintain a positive thoughtful approach to investing can do so however they must expect that when they launch into their attacks here on TSEx if they make up arguments unsupported by evidence it will be pointed out by those who love to research and rely upon fact not emotion to invest.

My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder

 

[M_C]

Hi All
Many are annoyed with dot joining.

Many are completely ambivalent to dot joining.

The whole basis of the 1,000 Eyes was a mutual love of dot joining or as I prefer to call it research.

This place was a sanctuary for those who liked to research Brainchip free from everything that is HC.

When the partnership with SiFive was announced it was made clear that Brainchip fitted into SiFive’s plans for what it calls its Intelligence Series.

Later in what to HC seemed a completely unrelated irrelevant event Microchip won a major contract with NASA.

It was then announced that Microchip had engaged with SiFive and that it would be using SiFive’s Intelligence series processors as part of the NASA contract.

Again those at HC saw no relevance in this partnering to Brainchip.

Here on TSEx however the 1,000 Eyes kept researching and in the end the research convinced me that Brainchip was most likely involved with Microchip. As HC was unable to plunge their fingers through the open wounds they derided this idea.

Then at CES 2024 it is publicly disclosed that Brainchip has had a close partnership of some long standing with Microchip and are demonstrating a combination technology which will be taken to Microchip’s customers.

Those who want to be critical of those who maintain a positive thoughtful approach to investing can do so however they must expect that when they launch into their attacks here on TSEx if they make up arguments unsupported by evidence it will be pointed out by those who love to research and rely upon fact not emotion to invest.

My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder

Partners Ecosystem - SiFive

View SiFive ecosystem partners that support the RISC-V revolution.

www.sifive.com

 

[Damo4]

Hi All
Many are annoyed with dot joining.

Many are completely ambivalent to dot joining.

The whole basis of the 1,000 Eyes was a mutual love of dot joining or as I prefer to call it research.

This place was a sanctuary for those who liked to research Brainchip free from everything that is HC.

When the partnership with SiFive was announced it was made clear that Brainchip fitted into SiFive’s plans for what it calls its Intelligence Series.

Later in what to HC seemed a completely unrelated irrelevant event Microchip won a major contract with NASA.

It was then announced that Microchip had engaged with SiFive and that it would be using SiFive’s Intelligence series processors as part of the NASA contract.

Again those at HC saw no relevance in this partnering to Brainchip.

Here on TSEx however the 1,000 Eyes kept researching and in the end the research convinced me that Brainchip was most likely involved with Microchip. As HC was unable to plunge their fingers through the open wounds they derided this idea.

Then at CES 2024 it is publicly disclosed that Brainchip has had a close partnership of some long standing with Microchip and are demonstrating a combination technology which will be taken to Microchip’s customers.

Those who want to be critical of those who maintain a positive thoughtful approach to investing can do so however they must expect that when they launch into their attacks here on TSEx if they make up arguments unsupported by evidence it will be pointed out by those who love to research and rely upon fact not emotion to invest.

My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder

Can't forget the big catalyst too.
Funny how this gets forgotten and the assumption is this place should be the same as HC.
It's supposed to be a group to safely research, not bitch and moan about a company not meeting your own personal expectations.

 

[DK6161]

View attachment 54618


View attachment 54616

National Center for the Advancement of Semiconductor Technology | Natcast

Drive innovation, collaborate with industry leaders, and access the resources you need to shape tomorrow’s technology.

natcast.org

Congratulations M_C!

 

[AI_Inquirer]

Hi all,

I have this serious question to many of you holders and I welcome both positive comments and negative. I'm not here to start a fight just want some honest opinions.

So July 2020 BRN SP was at 16.5 cents which is what our current sp sits around plus minus a penny or 2.

We still had not released Akida just yet but everything else was unknown.

Today January 2024 3.5 years later we sit at 15.5 cents. I do not think I need to write up our IP deals or partnerships that have been reported. No data just the PR the ASX and what's been stated by the board.

This is not advice to buy or sell shares I'm just looking for genuine comments.

If you bought post July 2020 and look at the accomplishment and potential products what would stop you from buying today compared to you buying post July 2020?

What is your real outlook for the company do you feel they will succeed? Fail and Why?

My awnser is that I would feel comfortable making a buying more shares if I could but unfortunately my circumstances do not allow for it.

I feel today's price has less risk and more value wuth the know partnerships that have been disclosed.

I feel that revenue from our past deals is around the corner.

I do feel that there was a larger expectations then has been delivered so far and its been disappointing to say the least thats on the revenue front.

On the ecosystem and partnership front the company has really grown there are quite a few leads to revenue streams that will make the company buoyant financially IMO.

I guess when I look at the SP I view what could be in1 year in 2 years as very positive. When I look at the past its easy to see why many have abandoned ship or lost faith in BRN.

Holders are suffering a paper loss thats fore sure. But if you pulled out the excel sheet and looked at all the cross trades and CXA going at 15.25 cents and selling it make me wonder who is in control. There is very little interest buyer atm clearly.

If you look at the short increase pre CES and during the CES there was no shorts taken very little post CES again they are hitting it hard this week. Clearly the shorter did not was concerned about some news or interested buying but any time there is momentum short increase and kill it. They have their algorithms and systems tweeked and will run the SP as the choose only time the lose out is when there is a change in momentum and buyers return or one of the institution will feel enough is enough lets buy here. So who now when this day comes is beyond me. We have not had a good ASX announcement in years

My thoughts,

The upcoming release of the 4C report has prompted investors to delay decisions, anticipating it will mirror recent reports. While I believe the market has factored this in, concerns linger about a potential negative market reaction and nullified the CES news stories.

In reference to the podcast's series, the Onsemi podcast was noteworthy for the new relationship and demo project information. The Teksun podcast also stood out for its speaker's frank discussion of challenges, providing valuable insights for those wondering about the delay in getting to market.

On the flip side, the remaining podcasts appeared to be primarily focused on generic marketing content, filled with buzzwords and self-congratulation (keeping in mind that they are marketing materials rather than direct communication with shareholders, so I don't mean that analysis too harshly). Their primary aim appeared to remind the industry of our ongoing engagement in some form with notable names.

My broader takeaway is that edge AI is becoming more application-oriented, necessitating marketing and sales efforts after partnering to build specific products. This poses questions about our plans for broadscale IP license sales in the short term, and while CES instilled confidence in progress, there's no immediate sense of urgency for investors. I suspect there's a prevailing sentiment among new investors of adopting a wait-and-see approach to observe how things unfold.

When it comes to management, I'm unsure about what happens behind closed doors. There is the positives of bringing in big talent and letting go of less productive parts of the sales team, I believe if they conducted a survey asking all shareholders about their level of trust, the results would likely be extremely low. I have no doubt some of the past public rhetoric and behaviour have been detrimental.

In general, I am of the belief that we are nearing the point of being in the right place at the right time with the right product and have a team that has gained more experience.

 

[Xray1]

My thoughts,

The upcoming release of the 4C report has prompted investors to delay decisions, anticipating it will mirror recent reports. While I believe the market has factored this in, concerns linger about a potential negative market reaction and nullified the CES news stories.

In reference to the podcast's series, the Onsemi podcast was noteworthy for the new relationship and demo project information. The Teksun podcast also stood out for its speaker's frank discussion of challenges, providing valuable insights for those wondering about the delay in getting to market.

On the flip side, the remaining podcasts appeared to be primarily focused on generic marketing content, filled with buzzwords and self-congratulation (keeping in mind that they are marketing materials rather than direct communication with shareholders, so I don't mean that analysis too harshly). Their primary aim appeared to remind the industry of our ongoing engagement in some form with notable names.

My broader takeaway is that edge AI is becoming more application-oriented, necessitating marketing and sales efforts after partnering to build specific products. This poses questions about our plans for broadscale IP license sales in the short term, and while CES instilled confidence in progress, there's no immediate sense of urgency for investors. I suspect there's a prevailing sentiment among new investors of adopting a wait-and-see approach to observe how things unfold.

When it comes to management, I'm unsure about what happens behind closed doors. There is the positives of bringing in big talent and letting go of less productive parts of the sales team, I believe if they conducted a survey asking all shareholders about their level of trust, the results would likely be extremely low. I have no doubt some of the past public rhetoric and behaviour have been detrimental.

In general, I am of the belief that we are nearing the point of being in the right place at the right time with the right product and have a team that has gained more experience.

Well stated ... a great post

 

[skutza]

My thoughts,

The upcoming release of the 4C report has prompted investors to delay decisions, anticipating it will mirror recent reports. While I believe the market has factored this in, concerns linger about a potential negative market reaction and nullified the CES news stories.

In reference to the podcast's series, the Onsemi podcast was noteworthy for the new relationship and demo project information. The Teksun podcast also stood out for its speaker's frank discussion of challenges, providing valuable insights for those wondering about the delay in getting to market.

On the flip side, the remaining podcasts appeared to be primarily focused on generic marketing content, filled with buzzwords and self-congratulation (keeping in mind that they are marketing materials rather than direct communication with shareholders, so I don't mean that analysis too harshly). Their primary aim appeared to remind the industry of our ongoing engagement in some form with notable names.

My broader takeaway is that edge AI is becoming more application-oriented, necessitating marketing and sales efforts after partnering to build specific products. This poses questions about our plans for broadscale IP license sales in the short term, and while CES instilled confidence in progress, there's no immediate sense of urgency for investors. I suspect there's a prevailing sentiment among new investors of adopting a wait-and-see approach to observe how things unfold.

When it comes to management, I'm unsure about what happens behind closed doors. There is the positives of bringing in big talent and letting go of less productive parts of the sales team, I believe if they conducted a survey asking all shareholders about their level of trust, the results would likely be extremely low. I have no doubt some of the past public rhetoric and behaviour have been detrimental.

In general, I am of the belief that we are nearing the point of being in the right place at the right time with the right product and have a team that has gained more experience.

I believe you are 100% correct. People as a whole go by the rule, "don't catch a falling knife". What a fall it has been. Anyone trying to, has cut their hands doing so. Smarter investors are sticking to their rules.

(-) It seems we are getting noticed by the Edge Market, but not the ASX market. If our revenue is under $100k again then this will not go well for us. Whether we like it or not, the calls of "a fish and chip shop doing better revenue than us" is 100% correct. the difference is the fish and chip shop will only ever do those numbers. Unless they decide to pack other products in the wrapped butchers paper. (Sorry been watching "boy swallows universe, I highly recommend it).

Edit; (+) However, if we see a decent rise in our revenue, i think the market will grab this by the Kahunas and we'll shoot out back past 50c in no time. Many are well versed in the possibilities of BRN and lumpy or steady stream of revenue will be the last block needed to show the Market the BRN are ready to rock and roll. $$$ is the key, it doesn't even need to be huge, just enough to get the market to rethink that BRN can be the real deal. There has been enough chatter in the industry to show we are, the market is waiting for $$$$ evidence. IMO

 

[David holland]

I believe you are 100% correct. People as a whole go by the rule, "don't catch a falling knife". What a fall it has been. Anyone trying to has cut their hands in doing so. Smarter investors are sticking to their rules.

(-) It seems we are getting noticed by the Edge Market, but not the ASX market. If our revenue is under $100k again then this will not go well for us. Whether we like it or not, the calls of "a fish and chip shop doing better revenue than us" is 100% correct. the difference is the fish and chip shop will only ever do those numbers. Unless they decide to pack other products in the wrapped butchers paper. (Sorry been watching "boy swallows universe, I highly recommend it).

Edit; (+) However, if we see a decent rise in our revenue, i think the market will grab this by the Kahunas and we'll shoot out back past 50c in no time. Many are well versed in the possibilities of BRN and lumpy or steady stream of revenue will be the last block needed to show the Market the BRN are ready to rock and roll. $$$ is the key, it doesn't even need to be huge, just enough to get the market to rethink that BRN can be the real deal. There has been enough chatter in the industry to show we are, the market is waiting for $$$$ evidence. IMO

Sean's team has done a magnificent job but at this stage of the game the 1 thing he lacks is a IP Licence under his watch,
I have no doubt this is coming,probably 1 after another, pls be patient

 

[Xray1]

My thoughts,

The upcoming release of the 4C report has prompted investors to delay decisions, anticipating it will mirror recent reports. While I believe the market has factored this in, concerns linger about a potential negative market reaction and nullified the CES news stories.

In reference to the podcast's series, the Onsemi podcast was noteworthy for the new relationship and demo project information. The Teksun podcast also stood out for its speaker's frank discussion of challenges, providing valuable insights for those wondering about the delay in getting to market.

On the flip side, the remaining podcasts appeared to be primarily focused on generic marketing content, filled with buzzwords and self-congratulation (keeping in mind that they are marketing materials rather than direct communication with shareholders, so I don't mean that analysis too harshly). Their primary aim appeared to remind the industry of our ongoing engagement in some form with notable names.

My broader takeaway is that edge AI is becoming more application-oriented, necessitating marketing and sales efforts after partnering to build specific products. This poses questions about our plans for broadscale IP license sales in the short term, and while CES instilled confidence in progress, there's no immediate sense of urgency for investors. I suspect there's a prevailing sentiment among new investors of adopting a wait-and-see approach to observe how things unfold.

When it comes to management, I'm unsure about what happens behind closed doors. There is the positives of bringing in big talent and letting go of less productive parts of the sales team, I believe if they conducted a survey asking all shareholders about their level of trust, the results would likely be extremely low. I have no doubt some of the past public rhetoric and behaviour have been detrimental.

In general, I am of the belief that we are nearing the point of being in the right place at the right time with the right product and have a team that has gained more experience.

I believe you are 100% correct. People as a whole go by the rule, "don't catch a falling knife". What a fall it has been. Anyone trying to has cut their hands in doing so. Smarter investors are sticking to their rules.

(-) It seems we are getting noticed by the Edge Market, but not the ASX market. If our revenue is under $100k again then this will not go well for us. Whether we like it or not, the calls of "a fish and chip shop doing better revenue than us" is 100% correct. the difference is the fish and chip shop will only ever do those numbers. Unless they decide to pack other products in the wrapped butchers paper. (Sorry been watching "boy swallows universe, I highly recommend it).

Edit; (+) However, if we see a decent rise in our revenue, i think the market will grab this by the Kahunas and we'll shoot out back past 50c in no time. Many are well versed in the possibilities of BRN and lumpy or steady stream of revenue will be the last block needed to show the Market the BRN are ready to rock and roll. $$$ is the key, it doesn't even need to be huge, just enough to get the market to rethink that BRN can be the real deal. There has been enough chatter in the industry to show we are, the market is waiting for $$$$ evidence. IMO

Another great post for today .... I hope the Co does read these two posts from both you and AI Inquirer, which touches on the general situation and insights of the Co's overall position from a s/holders perspective.

 

[Xray1]

Sean's team has done a magnificent job but at this stage of the game the 1 thing he lacks is a IP Licence under his watch,
I have no doubt this is coming,probably 1 after another, pls be patient

As Sean H has previously said : not to judge him on effort but on results ........... and his other statement : watch the financials....... IMO, it will be interesting to see what evenuates in this and the next 4C before the AGM

 

[toasty]

As Sean H has previously said : not to judge him on effort but on results ........... and his other statement : watch the financials....... IMO, it will be interesting to see what evenuates in this and the next 4C before the AGM

Yes it will be interesting. A second strike at the AGM would be distracting for the board and management so I hope it doesn't happen. That said, I'll be abstaining as my own personal protest at their largesse to themselves in the face of a collapsing share price and no visible commercial/revenue improvements. I am satisfied with their ecosystem progress but gifting themselves parcels of shares when they have has not been a good look......FWIW

 

[AARONASX]

I still assume there is a lot is going on behind closed doors, firing the CEO because it's taken too long for us shareholds to see profits can have a negative effect and will not paint a good picture for Brainchip....if they are seen to unable to get their sh*t together.

Been transparent to your share holders as to what the company is doing, why delays and what the company is doing about it, or even how busy the team is...a road map / updated investor presentation is deffently needed right about now,

For all we know Sean may be signing left right and centre NDA and inking contract deals as we agrue which is better than we can hope or dream, or alternatively we have been hoodwinked..time will tell

Maybe juding on effort might have been the better option

 

[Fact Finder]

Just a few comments:

1. A second strike, a spill and election of Directors does not touch the position of CEO. His/Her position is unaffected.

2. It has been stated more than once and in some detail by the Chair at the last AGM that as Brainchip cannot afford to match market salaries dollar for dollar to attract the right people they provide shares as part of the salary package.

3. Work is such a ‘sh-t’ you have to pay people to do it.

4. I cannot name anyone from my life experience who refused to take their pay on pay day.

My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder

 

[toasty]

Just a few comments:

1. A second strike, a spill and election of Directors does not touch the position of CEO. His/Her position is unaffected.

2. It has been stated more than once and in some detail by the Chair at the last AGM that as Brainchip cannot afford to match market salaries dollar for dollar to attract the right people they provide shares as part of the salary package.

3. Work is such a ‘sh-t’ you have to pay people to do it.

4. I cannot name anyone from my life experience who refused to take their pay on pay day.

My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder

Except when the CEO is also a director, which I believe Sean is.............

 

[Fact Finder]

Except when the CEO is also a director, which I believe Sean is.............

It still does not remove him as CEO.
The Current Board has on its face been happy with his performance and approved his decisions.

Re-election of Directors is a simple majority vote. If they stand again highly likely they will be elected again as 51% can be garnered from the top 1,000 shareholders who hold 70% of the shares on issue.

To remove CEO it would require a majority of new Board members not aligned with the CEO to be elected.

Where will those alternate Directors come from the ranks of HC.

We do not know of any friendly institution or company sitting amongst the ranks of shareholders.

I am sure those who are calling for this vote will continue to do so and offer no answers to these questions.

My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder

 

[Bravo]

Perhaps Rob should call Sam Altman to remind him of an available resource that isn't nuclear fusion which can help with this issue. Would be the perfect opportunity to discuss the benefits of neuromorphic computing in helping to reduce AI's massive energy consumption.


EXTRACT ONLY

Sam Altman: Age of AI will require an ‘energy breakthrough’​

Speaking at Davos, OpenAI's CEO spoke of a vague AI future made possible only by currently unavailable resources.

BY MACK DEGEURIN | PUBLISHED JAN 18, 2024 2:09 PM EST

• TECHNOLOGY

Sam Altman, chief executive officer of OpenAI, attends the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland. Halil Sagirkaya/Anadolu via Getty


Open AI CEO Sam Altman believes long-awaited nuclear fusion may be the silver bullet needed to solve artificial intelligence’s glutinous energy appetite and pave the way for an AI revolution. When that revolution does arrive, however, it might not seem quite as shocking as he once claimed.

Altman touched on AI’s growing demands earlier this week while speaking at a Bloomberg event outside of the annual World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland. The CEO said powerful new AI models would likely require even more energy consumption than previously imagined. Solving that energy deficit, he suggested, will require a “breakthrough” in nuclear fusion.

“There’s no way to get there without a breakthrough,” Altman said at the event according to Reuters. “It motivates us to go invest more in [nuclear] fusion.”

AI’s energy problem​

Though some AI proponents believe insights gleaned from advanced models could help fight climate change in novel ways, a growing body of research suggests the up-front energy required to train these complex models is taking a toll of its own. Experts expect the vast amounts of data needed to train models like OpenAI’s GPT and Google’s Bard could increase the global data server industry, which the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates already accounts for around 2-3% of global greenhouse gas emissions.

Researchers estimate training a single large language model like GPT-4 could use around 300 tons of CO2. Others estimate a single image spit out by AI image generator tools like Dall-E or Stable Diffusion requires the same amount of energy as charging a smartphone. The massive server farms needed to facilitate AI training also require vast amounts of water to stay cool. GPT-3 alone, recent research suggests, may have consumed 185,000 gallons of water during its training period.

Sam Altman: Age of AI will require an 'energy breakthrough'

Speaking at Davos, OpenAI's CEO spoke of a vague AI future made possible only by currently unavailable resources.

www.popsci.com

 

[White Horse]

Just a few comments:

1. A second strike, a spill and election of Directors does not touch the position of CEO. His/Her position is unaffected.

2. It has been stated more than once and in some detail by the Chair at the last AGM that as Brainchip cannot afford to match market salaries dollar for dollar to attract the right people they provide shares as part of the salary package.

3. Work is such a ‘sh-t’ you have to pay people to do it.

4. I cannot name anyone from my life experience who refused to take their pay on pay day.

My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder

Hello FF,
I can think of only two. Although they were in public office not public companies.
The most recent was Alderman Ted Mack, mayor of North Sydney.
And secondly, and probably the most industrious was Charles Moore, Lord Mayor of Sydney 1867-69.
Both of whom, refused to take a salary.

 

[Fullmoonfever]

Except when the CEO is also a director, which I believe Sean is.............

Hi Toasty,

I posted this elsewhere a while ago to hopefully add some clarity.

Highlighted a bit below to make it simple....given there doesn't appear to be a specific titled MD I would expect he is essentially the MD as part of the CEO title. So I expect a spill won't affect him imo.

The other thing is I read that whilst a second strike may be voted for by all SH, it is not a fait accompli as the below states that the company then has to put it to a vote AT the AGM to those attending and eligible to see if it is supported.

Seems to be key wording there and I could be wrong but appears only those AT the meeting can then cast an overall vote and even then it then has to go to an EGM.


What is the two strikes rule?

In summary, the two strikes rule is a staged process that works like this.

1. At its annual general meeting (AGM), the company must put a resolution to approve the remuneration report to shareholders. If more than 25 per cent of eligible shareholders vote against the resolution, the company receives a ‘first strike’.
2. At the following year’s AGM, the company must again put a resolution to approve the remuneration report to shareholders. If, in that year, more than 25 per cent of the eligible shareholders again vote against the resolution, the company receives a ‘second strike’.
3. If the company receives two consecutive ‘no’ votes on the remuneration report resolutions, then the company must immediately put to the AGM at which the second ‘no’ vote was cast a resolution to hold a spill meeting.
4. If the majority of those at the AGM eligible to vote on the spill resolution vote to support the spill resolution, then all board positions (except for the managing director) are declared vacant and become open for election, and a special meeting must then be held within 90 days of the spill resolution — the extraordinary general meeting (EGM).
5. The EGM will then consider whether to spill some or all of the board.

Each step has specific rules in relation to shareholder voting eligibility.

 

[7für7]

I keep realizing with amazement how little patience people generally have in today's time. In the stock market, the younger generation demands a startup to achieve in performance what others have accomplished in a span of 10-20 years. Just imagine that. Others think that the stock price will go to $150 overnight once invested. Nonsense. In the job market, people demand utopian salaries with a 4-day workweek, 5-hour workday, and 300 days of vacation – no wonder everything is going downhill. Due to all the YouTubers and Insta stars, people have lost touch with reality and the processes in the free market economy