BRN Discussion Ongoing

[DingoBorat]

So you want to say another seller was there on 35 and 35.5 cents as well while there was a buyer for 41.5 cents and actual price was 37.5
So why someone will pay 41.5 cents when other is selling at 35 cents. And why the last person bought at 37.5 cents when stock was available at 35 cents.
Now think the other way around buyer wants seller at 35 cents and seller wants buyer at 41.5 cents and actual price is 37.5 cents. Does that make sense??

"Now think the other way around buyer wants seller at 35 cents and seller wants buyer at 41.5 cents and actual price is 37.5 cents. Does that make sense??"

That makes perfect sense Rgupta, that a buyer wants to buy for less and a seller sell for more..

But that's not how it works in the opening and closing auctions.

Buyers are buyers and sellers are stupid... .. Sorry, they are sellers.

The format of the system, doesn't change, for these auctions.

It's a bit like "normal" everyday auctions, if there are a lot of buyers, prepared to pay more, the price will go up.
If the seller (in the case of the ASX, it's multiple) is willing to accept a lower price, it will go down (especially if there are few buyers).

The indicative price and overhang either way (negative or positive volume) is the buys and sells matched off against each other.

Maybe this can explain it better for you.

As the title says, it can be confusing, until you understand what's going on.

Understanding the ASX opening and closing auctions - The Rivkin Report

The opening and closing auctions can be confusing to understand. We explain these in detail.

rivkin.com.au

 

[DingoBorat]

"Since there are severe restrictions on heat generation, particularly for embedded devices, both higher performance and lower power consumption are required in AI chips"

All things that AKIDA easily solves.

My eyes widened though, when I saw this..

(flexible N:M pruning technology)

Is this a direct reference to Simon's N of M coding??

Hey @Diogenese, what do you think ..

Hey @Diogenese, you got your eyes on?

 

[GazDix]

Charts (TA) - technical analysis and fundamentals (FA) go hand in hand.

If long term, in theory no one should care about the TA. But if they are looking at an entry/exit, charts can be a great tool for that.

But FA can blow away any chart for whatever reason (including not a fundamental one) in either direction as the market was reminded of our Annual Report only yesterday and it went down. Also just like the Mercedes news in Jan, 2022, we went up quickly.

Long term chartists... depending on the asset, for Brainchip that behaves as a volatile one as we do. I don't think TA can be reliable at all unless you game the system and know if the silence will continue as it has for implied profit making (yes, screw the revenue narrative) announcements.

 

[Fenris78]

Shots fired..... I've given up guessing/predicting who might be using Akida... but it's great to see that the competition is heating up. This can only be good for Akida's time to market at scale???

Arm-powered Snapdragon X Elite laptop shown outperforming Intel Core Ultra by up to 10X in AI tests — Qualcomm fires early NPU shots at Intel [Updated]

But Intel has Arrow Lake and Lunar Lake waiting in the wings.

www.tomshardware.com

 

[Jasonk]

Not say it's BRN; being partners it's nice to know the calibre of Prophesee's network and what they are up to.

Prophesee's Image Deblur Solution for Smartphones is now production-ready

MWC reveal showcases the multi-year collaboration between Prophesee and Qualcomm resulting in next-generation blur-free mobile photography, now ready for customer integration into Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 enabled devices.

www.prophesee.ai

 

[Fenris78]

Intel CEO attacks Nvidia on AI: 'The entire industry is motivated to eliminate the CUDA market'

Reframing the AI framework, away from CUDA and toward more open standards.

www.tomshardware.com

 

[Pom down under]

Prophesee looks to neuromorphic AI in smartphones

Neuromorphic AI pioneer Prophesee has commerciliased a reference design for its sensor and software in mobile phones.

www.eenewseurope.com

Neuromorphic AI pioneer Prophesee has commercialised a reference design for its sensor and software in mobile phones.​

The neuromorphic event-driven sensor, which is co-developed with Sony, is being used alongside a traditional camera to provide more data about the image. This can be used to deblur a picture of video, and improve the image quality, particularly in low light with longer exposure times.

The Metavision Image Deblur Solution for Smartphones is now a production-ready module that is optimized for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Mobile Platform used by high end smartphone makers.
The neuromorphic sensor has 1m pixels and uses the motion data to optimise the setting of the image sensor for computational photography, Luca Verre, CEO and co-founder of Prophesee tells eeNews Europe in a demonstration at Mobile World Congress 2024.
“We have made significant progress since we announced this collaboration with Qualcomm in February 2023, achieving the technical milestones that demonstrate the impressive impact on image quality our event-based technology has in mobile devices containing Snapdragon mobile platforms. As a result, our Metavision Deblur solution has now reached production readiness,” said Verre.

Adding the neuromorphic, event driven sensor to a phone opens up other applications. One of these is the ability to upscale video quality to 60 frame/s and 4K by using the motion data.
“This is the first step with computational photography,” he said. “You can get blur at any time indoors with some motion, from a few pixels to 40 or 50 pixels. We have good results of deblurring to 100 pixels to we can get the residual blur down to 1 or 2 pixels in any conditions, but particularly in extended exposures in low light.”

• Prophesee releases all its neuromorphic AI software for free
• €50m for event driven camera maker Prophesee
• Event-based sensor for ‘always-on’ video, low-power apps

Each pixel in the Metavision sensor embeds a logic core, enabling it to act as a neuron.
They each activate themselves intelligently and asynchronously depending on the amount of photons they sense. A pixel activating itself is called an event. In essence, events are driven by the scene’s dynamics, not an arbitrary clock anymore, so the acquisition speed always matches the actual scene dynamics.
High-performance event-based deblurring is achieved by synchronizing a frame-based and Prophesee’s event-based sensor. The system then fills the gaps between and inside the frames with microsecond events to algorithmically extract pure motion information and repair motion blur.
Prophesee also has a fifth generation quarter VGA sensor manufactured by STMicroelectronics that can be used for eye tracking in smart glasses or to reduce the bandwidth of video in smart home and IoT applications as well as provide low power ‘always on capability’ to wake up the system when motion is detected.
“We are pursuing two paths, one to increase the resolution and the other is to decrease the size of the sensor with computational imaging on one side and XR on the other,” said Verre.

 

[Pom down under]

Just listening to Sean, and Dr Tony Lewis says

" i think my entire career has been leading up to cto at this company"

What a statement.

View attachment 58077

 

[Pom down under]

Brainchip share price crashes 23% following another year of losses for ASX AI chipmaker

Having soared 206% over the past month (as of market open), the Brainchip Holdings Ltd (ASX: BRN) share price is crashing today.

www.fool.com.au

 

[cosors]

Brainchip share price crashes 23% following another year of losses for ASX AI chipmaker

Having soared 206% over the past month (as of market open), the Brainchip Holdings Ltd (ASX: BRN) share price is crashing today.

www.fool.com.au

View attachment 58133

I've been looking for a long time. Do any of you know what kind of movie this gif is from or where it comes from? One of the best gifs ever!

 

[Pom down under]

I've been looking for a long time. Do any of you know what kind of movie this gif is from or where it comes from? One of the best gifs ever!

Just tried searching but no luck either.

 

[cosors]

Habe es gerade mit der Suche versucht, aber auch kein Erfolg.

I have been looking for it intensively for a long time. I am grateful for any advice. They could do hands free in another way

 

[Cand2it]

Hello chippers,
I have been trying to understand one thing that I hope you clever people can help me with. Sean has said that it takes around 3-4 years for a IP customer to put a new product to market with our IP (from memory). Renesas and megachips signed IP contracts some years ago so hopefully they are soon ready with a product that will provide us with royalties. But what about all other eco system partners and early adopters. Are we expecting a IP license agreement from all these early adopters and partners and then 3-4 years from the signed contract untill a commercial royalty bearing product is ready?
Sorry if this has already been discussed.

 

[charles2]

View attachment 58122

Prophesee's Image Deblur Solution for Smartphones is now production-ready

MWC reveal showcases the multi-year collaboration between Prophesee and Qualcomm resulting in next-generation blur-free mobile photography, now ready for customer integration into Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 enabled devices.

www.prophesee.ai

Somehow I have gotten lost as to what our prospects/relationship with Prophesee currently is. Am I the only one?

If someone could get me up to speed I would appreciate it. Or just refer me to an appropriate post. All I ever see is their relationship with Qualcomm touted but I know that they are familiar with AKIDA and it is right up their alley.

 

[chapman89]

Hello chippers,
I have been trying to understand one thing that I hope you clever people can help me with. Sean has said that it takes around 3-4 years for a IP customer to put a new product to market with our IP (from memory). Renesas and megachips signed IP contracts some years ago so hopefully they are soon ready with a product that will provide us with royalties. But what about all other eco system partners and early adopters. Are we expecting a IP license agreement from all these early adopters and partners and then 3-4 years from the signed contract untill a commercial royalty bearing product is ready?
Sorry if this has already been discussed.

I’ve often thought of the same thing, and whilst I believe for some companies that may be the case, there’s other companies such as OnSemi, Microchip, Mercedes and of course many many others whether known or unknown that have been working with us for 1-4 years who have been in the background designing their applications with akida, getting ready to come to market, which as we know some have been displaying at CES and other shows.

It will be a great few years coming

 

[ndefries]

Somehow I have gotten lost as to what our prospects/relationship with Prophesee currently is. Am I the only one?

If someone could get me up to speed I would appreciate it. Or just refer me to an appropriate post. All I ever see is their relationship with Qualcomm touted but I know that they are familiar with AKIDA and it is right up their alley.

I think the most famous comment from their founder when on our podcast was that they were worried they were building a house of cards until brainchip came along. That we complement their product so well. Their connection to Sony and qualcomm is so close and this partnership is so important to brainchip I hope there is a good update soon.

 

[Cand2it]

Without a signed IP contract with us how can Prophesee be using our IP in their products? Is it correct to say that that we cannot expect any royalties from any partner if they havent signed a IP contract? @Fact Finder could you please shed some light on this? Sean also said in the webinar that it was a high priority for the sales team to get more IP contracts. I hope it is possible that our IP can be used by partners without an IP agreement. Then hopefully revenue will appear suddenly. I just dont understand how anyone can pay us without any formally signed contract.

 

[FJ-215]

Without a signed IP contract with us how can Prophesee be using our IP in their products? Is it correct to say that that we cannot expect any royalties from any partner if they havent signed a IP contract? @Fact Finder could you please shed some light on this? Sean also said in the webinar that it was a high priority for the sales team to get more IP contracts. I hope it is possible that our IP can be used by partners without an IP agreement. Then hopefully revenue will appear suddenly. I just dont understand how anyone can pay us without any formally signed contract.

Morning @Cand2it,

Prophesee aren't using our IP in their current products. Think of it more as we are in development for their next generation products.

 

[wilzy123]

 

[Fact Finder]

Well, I sense an understandable degree of cynicism and scepticism from I suspect, rightly or wrongly, someone who hasn't really delved into the intricacies of TA themselves?

It can be easy to dismiss that which we do not really understand wouldn't you agree.

Though, you describe yourself as a technophobe yet, are on face value, heavily invested in a highly technologically driven and complex product.

Like a lot of us, you may not fully understand the product intricacies yet made a wise decision based on your own assessment within your own research and understanding.

Your point re public share forum chartists has an element of validity in so much as they influence a certain number of so called followers or even those uninitiated who don't do their own research to cross check the pronouncements.

Though, I temper that with the fact that these public chartists are actually putting their calls out there for public scrutiny and anyone can go back through their historical posts to see how successful their calls were or were BS.

That way the reader can judge accordingly. If they choose to jump on blind faith, so be it and own it as an individual.

I agree though that there are those that no doubt deliberately attempt to influence others for their own gain or reasons, no less than the fundamental posters of the same ilk do too.

Whilst there are a number of TSE members who know or communicate personally with you, you are an anonymous poster to me as we have not met or communicated privately.

Does that mean that I don't respect and value your thoughts, analysis, opinions?

Not at all.

I take those as they should be, with a grain of salt to be be read, digested and then conclude in my own opinion the merit of them.

However, one could argue that with your following here and previously elsewhere that you too may have had certain influences, indirectly and not intentionally, but influences none the less.

A public Chartist is highly unlikely to move a stock the way you appear to be describing.

I would contend that a simple uttering by a certain car manufacturer had far more ramification to the SP than a public Chartist, wouldn't you agree?

As far chartists knowing each other, I must be one of the rare ones then.

Generally I don't engage much with others outside of the forum threads...the occasional DM but that has literally been 2 or 3 here on TSE.

As such, I find your statement that it's rare regarding 2 chartists coming to similar conclusions that don't know each other to be a bit generalist and not really based on fact imo.

Chartists can interpret differently depending on skill, study, type of style they follow etc and can only present their conclusions based on that, no different than someone giving a SP prediction in 3, 6 or 12 months yet, we've all seen and often participated in those threads.

Fun, wishful thinking, based on facts or just an interpretation of the known and unknown fundamentals, market, industry and probability of that SP outcome?

Sounds a bit like charting in some ways.

Simple first rule of charting imo is look left then look right.

That will help identify the basics of potential future support and resistance areas, trend lines and reactions by the mkt to certain events or expectations on the upcoming of those events.

That and an understanding that charts need to be looked at in different timeframes depending on what the person is trying to uncover or decipher is just as important, as patterns or behaviours can validate or fail within days or sometimes months.

Good chat thanks and will leave it there for readers to take what they will out of it re charts, fundamentals or a combination of both tools when investing.

Edit. I forgot to add there was a Short Term Trading forum on the other place I used to frequent for a few years and there was a competition where your success was absolutely measured.

It was run by the posters and a great place to learn from others as the respect and discussions were not dissimilar to here.

There were specific rules and a running leaderboard updated every Sunday evening before the new trading week.

You could tip a stock TA or FA or both and either long or short or both and you were only successful if your tip gained 25% within 4 weeks from memory so looking for breakout patterns or upcoming FA catalysts was paramount.

The table collated everyone on an ongoing basis with quite a bit of info / stats and your tip had to meet certain criteria as to why. There had to be some substance for all to read and judge the merit of your call.

I need unfortunately to address some of your points:

1. I make clear I am a technophobe so that no one thinks I have a background in engineering or data science and am bringing any particular expertise in this area.

2. I read widely on the merits of charting which convinced me it was not science as I understood science.

3. Following this I asked the opinion of someone who has appropriate academic qualifications and who worked at the Bank of England in Foreign Exchange regulation at the time and they confirmed my view of its merits.

4. This person also referred me to Warren Buffets views on charting which I am sure you would be well aware of as he is usually asked at least once a year.

5. A game on HC is not a controlled scientific test. If it were my predictions of Brainchip’s share price would score me at 66.6’% accuracy.

6. As to what influence anyone can have on social media I prefer to accept the opinions of regulators that social media campaigns are used to influence the market.

7. In your first response you made the point that charting involves the science of ‘mathematics, patterns, probability and psychology’. I go back to my point about why I describe myself as a technophobe. Even if charting was a science those who practice the art to receive intellectual respect would need to disclose their CV covering the study of each of these sciences so that their claimed expertise can be weighed and validated. Going back and counting up how many times they guessed correctly when most take each way bets is far from a controlled scientific examination of their expertise.

Finally my comments were never directed at yourself. You consistently provide amazing research contributions and do not as far as I can recall ever give other than balanced opinions.

So as you said I will leave it here as we have diametrically opposed views on this one subject.

My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder