BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
suss
Regular
Partner = enabler/channel for commercial products
How many of these partners have resulted commercial products? Until this happens, we're all just in a holding pattern.. The nervousness is understandable....
Bravo
If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
With any luck this standardized benchmarking framework will help BrainChip to validate Akida's performance and efficiency compared with conventional methods.
www.nature.com
The neurobench framework for benchmarking neuromorphic computing algorithms and systems - Nature Communications
Brain-inspired neuromorphic algorithms and systems have shown essential advance in efficiency and capabilities of AI applications. In this Perspective, the authors introduce NeuroBench, a benchmark framework for neuromorphic approaches, collaboratively designed by researchers across industry and...
We have entered that "period again"...the no solid news, but the solid speculative news !
Does anybody here think that Peters et al technology is being purposely held back, so other unnamed companies can "catch up" ?
The fact no company has signed a solid license agreement really bothers me, yes I know all about Renasas & MegaChips, but that in was 2020, wasn't it ?
Currently, the trading, (manipulation) pattern is so, so obvious, please don't give your shares away, that's not financial advice, that's " common sense"..hang tough, it's a real tug of war between "good and greedy".
No disrespect to my friend Peter, but I personally like how Tony speaks his truth on Linkedin and conducts himself on/in podcasts and interviews, he's honest and positive, and in many ways he is really blessed to have been given this opportunity from both Peter and Anil...when we "finally" succeed, please remember to acknowledge my friends, without them, Brainchip wouldn't exist.
Fact.....Akida we allu....Tech.
Yes, absolutely.
eg It's hard to understand the delay in signing up the sub-contractor for the AFRL deal.
I asked TD if BRN would announce the signing when it happens on the ASX, and he replied that it most likely would.
But with the delay lengthening, the same thought came to my mind, that RTX, or whoever the subcontractor might be, are not as committed as the AFRL.
This pattern seems to be same as with MB, Renesas, and other companies who are not supporting us financially, the very same companies who, ironically, suffered badly with supply chain issues in the past, and who, with a bit of work, could own their own chip that could be manufactured in multiple countries.
Clearly potential customers wanting to trial us would be also looking at what alternatives like NVIDIA have to offer with non-neuromorphic NPU's
I'd say that we are probably being held back by the constant fear amongst our potential clients that mega companies like NVIDIA and INTEL will destroy us or anyone wanting to use us in the future. You know the (unwritten) spiel - If you add an Akida chip to an NVIDIA system, then you will lose all the NVIDIA support you are currently receiving.
Nvidia Federal Litigation Filings - Company Legal Profiles
Justia - Company Profiles
companyprofiles.justia.com
Sean is a bit to blame, as his vision of us surviving in a few thousand drive-thru's or a few thousand satelites never looked feasible, especially since Akida was to be everywhere. Similarly the whole concept of an edge-box seems like waving the white flag: It's not up to BRN to find a use case for akida, so here, try yourself...
Whoever on the board stated that NVIDIA wasn't going to be a competitor but rather a partner, clearly doesn't know NVIDIA.
It will always seem impossible to break into the old boys club and I would love to see BRN do a joint venture in a product that goes up against a popular non-neuromorphic ai product. We retail investors are a hardy lot, so let the games begin.
Smoothsailing
Regular
Games have been going on for years getting sick of them that’s for sure, however I still believe we will hear an announcement prior to AGM.Yes, absolutely.
eg It's hard to understand the delay in signing up the sub-contractor for the AFRL deal.
I asked TD if BRN would announce the signing when it happens on the ASX, and he replied that it most likely would.
But with the delay lengthening, the same thought came to my mind, that RTX, or whoever the subcontractor might be, are not as committed as the AFRL.
This pattern seems to be same as with MB, Renesas, and other companies who are not supporting us financially, the very same companies who, ironically, suffered badly with supply chain issues in the past, and who, with a bit of work, could own their own chip that could be manufactured in multiple countries.
Clearly potential customers wanting to trial us would be also looking at what alternatives like NVIDIA have to offer with non-neuromorphic NPU's
I'd say that we are probably being held back by the constant fear amongst our potential clients that mega companies like NVIDIA and INTEL will destroy us or anyone wanting to use us in the future. You know the (unwritten) spiel - If you add an Akida chip to an NVIDIA system, then you will lose all the NVIDIA support you are currently receiving.
Nvidia Federal Litigation Filings - Company Legal Profiles
Justia - Company Profiles
Sean is a bit to blame, as his vision of us surviving in a few thousand drive-thru's or a few thousand satelites never looked feasible, especially since Akida was to be everywhere. Similarly the whole concept of an edge-box seems like waving the white flag: It's not up to BRN to find a use case for akida, so here, try yourself...
Whoever on the board stated that NVIDIA wasn't going to be a competitor but rather a partner, clearly doesn't know NVIDIA.
It will always seem impossible to break into the old boys club and I would love to see BRN do a joint venture in a product that goes up against a popular non-neuromorphic ai product. We retail investors are a hardy lot, so let the games begin.
uiux
Regular
Why I am stoked about the Iron Dome:
Post in thread 'America's Iron Dome' https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/americas-iron-dome.260527/post-450604
Post in thread 'America's Iron Dome' https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/americas-iron-dome.260527/post-450604
Hope so but this time last year we were all hoping for the same thing. The SP spiked from 16c to 48c in the weeks prior to the AGM on this same hope. Then the AGM was released with nothing new was announced and the SP slid back down to 16c after two months.
I guess the BoM can't really time their announcements to fit in with AGM's - if a deal comes in, it has to be announced straight away - so the ann. would have to be a matter of change of BRN strategy going forward.
Smoothsailing
Regular
I disagree with your analogy and believe they are steering the ship not the shareholders and can time their announcements accordingly to a degree that works best for the company.
Last edited:
toasty
Regular
They cannot time their announcements to suit the company. The regulations are quite clear about what can be announced and when. If it is a material matter, the board has no choice, except in some special circumstances. My current view is that there are a lot of parties interested but noone is yet willing to stump up the cash. The prospects may well be in the "noone ever got fired for buying big blue" stage...........
Last edited:
rgupta
Regular
If new sub contractor is still not assigned then how brainchip told us on asx that subcontractor costs can be around $800000 for the project.Yes, absolutely.
eg It's hard to understand the delay in signing up the sub-contractor for the AFRL deal.
I asked TD if BRN would announce the signing when it happens on the ASX, and he replied that it most likely would.
But with the delay lengthening, the same thought came to my mind, that RTX, or whoever the subcontractor might be, are not as committed as the AFRL.
This pattern seems to be same as with MB, Renesas, and other companies who are not supporting us financially, the very same companies who, ironically, suffered badly with supply chain issues in the past, and who, with a bit of work, could own their own chip that could be manufactured in multiple countries.
Clearly potential customers wanting to trial us would be also looking at what alternatives like NVIDIA have to offer with non-neuromorphic NPU's
I'd say that we are probably being held back by the constant fear amongst our potential clients that mega companies like NVIDIA and INTEL will destroy us or anyone wanting to use us in the future. You know the (unwritten) spiel - If you add an Akida chip to an NVIDIA system, then you will lose all the NVIDIA support you are currently receiving.
Nvidia Federal Litigation Filings - Company Legal Profiles
Justia - Company Profiles
Sean is a bit to blame, as his vision of us surviving in a few thousand drive-thru's or a few thousand satelites never looked feasible, especially since Akida was to be everywhere. Similarly the whole concept of an edge-box seems like waving the white flag: It's not up to BRN to find a use case for akida, so here, try yourself...
Whoever on the board stated that NVIDIA wasn't going to be a competitor but rather a partner, clearly doesn't know NVIDIA.
It will always seem impossible to break into the old boys club and I would love to see BRN do a joint venture in a product that goes up against a popular non-neuromorphic ai product. We retail investors are a hardy lot, so let the games begin.
Also if the team brainchip is so slow in such a big contract then what to expect from them?
That is where team brainchip jumps on a news without thinking ahead, how the market will perceive the same.
e.g last time about akida edge boxes, team brainchip start making noises somewhere mid 23 that it will be launched end 23 and even after end 24 we have no revenue from edge boxes.
To me it is a very communication, if it is right.
Dyor
Maybe I'm totally incorrect, but when Brainchip announced that we had won the 1.8 million USD contract from AFRL and that an unnamed subcontractor was to receive 800,000 USD as part of that fee for working alongside Brainchip for the 12 month contract period, and mentioning they were a major aerospace company, well isn't that enough ?Does the 3rd party have to be named ??...
Tech.
Tech.
HopalongPetrovski
I'm Spartacus!
rgupta
Regular
I 100% agree with you. The announcement was clear enough that subcontractor is assigned already.
But Isleki told us that TD is of the opinion that same is not done and TD assume brainchip will make a statement to market to that respect.
So donot know what is correct.
Dyor
uiux
Regular
It would certainly make one of my threads light up like a Xmas tree.
Does the 3rd party have to be named ?"
They have to sign their part of the contract first, but they are still "negotiating"
What are they still negotiating is anyone's guess. I hope that we're not being put on RTX's backburner.
BigDonger101
Founding Member
No it didn't? I would say months rather than weeks. It was already back down to 22/24 cents before the AGM.
I get what you mean but what you've said really paints a different picture.
The AGM was held 21 May 2024. We started falling from the 26th of Feb. reached our 15 cent mark (from 22/24 post AGM) again start of September.
There better be something significant before this AGM. BoD will look like fools if not.
Right you are. I was thinking Release of the Annual Report on 26/02/2024, in a few weeks.
Similar threads
