May as well hear from the horse's mouth, what the deal is..
I'm reliably informed, that he and Ron Vara have conversed and have concurred on the way forward.
Try not to think about the short term turmoil.
Fear will turn to greed, soon enough.
Not sure it has been confirmed it Qualcomms doing. It was suggested as a possible reason I thought?Is it fair to say then that Qualcomm could still want to integrate Brainchip into their products and this is why they have put a stop to others using us through edge impulse ?.
If Qualcomm want a piece of Neuromorphic at the Edge they will look to us.Is it fair to say then that Qualcomm could still want to integrate Brainchip into their products and this is why they have put a stop to others using us through edge impulse ?.
Thanks for getting back to me, mate. Yeah, Iâve been schooled.Hi Papacass,
You've misremembered:
"It is Akida 2 that has been on again - off again".
If Qualcomm want a piece of Neuromorphic at the Edge they will look to us.
The great thing about BRN from a client point of view is they can use 1000 knowing that they can move up fairly seamlessly to Gen2/TENNs as they improve existing or develop new products..
In the meantime just like us maybe Qualcomm are waiting until Edge AI demand picks up significantly before getting serious.
Hi Bravo,I don't see why notâunless Qualcomm is already working on a new iteration of Snapdragon that incorporates features similar to AKIDA. How feasible that is, I'm not entirely sure.
As far as I know, the current Snapdragon product isn't neuromorphic, isn't event-based, doesn't operate at ultra-low power, and doesnât support real-time on-device learning.
Judd Heape, VP of Product Management for Camera, Computer Vision, and Video at Qualcomm Technologies, was quoted in a June 2023 EE Times article saying, âThese event-based sensors are much more efficient because they can be programmed to easily detect motion at very low power. When thereâs no movement or change in the scene, the sensor consumes almost no power. So thatâs really interesting to us.â
In that context, he was referring to Prophesee and image-based sensors, but the underlying principle still applies I would have thoughtâevent-based sensors just make sense. And AKIDA is event-based.
We also know that a drone company is exploring a combination of AKIDA and Propheseeâs camera. Not Snapdragon. That says something.
So why wouldnât Qualcomm want to integrate our technology to gain a foothold in new marketsâespecially ones that are battery-powered and highly power-constrained? Surely paying for a licence would be chicken feed for the likes of Qualcomm, so I honestly don't know why they wouldn't be considering it.
Maybe someone with deeper technical insight can weigh in here.
View attachment 81620
EETimes article about Prophesee-Qualcomm deal
Full article here: https://www.eetimes.com/experts-weigh-impact-of-prophesee-qualcomm-deal/ Experts Weigh Impact of Prophesee-Qualcomm Deal ...image-sensors-world.blogspot.com
22M+ changed hands tho' JoMo. Probably Larry and Pom goin' hell for leather; they've been quiet.
Thank you very much for your response!!I don't see why notâunless Qualcomm is already working on a new iteration of Snapdragon that incorporates features similar to AKIDA. How feasible that is, I'm not entirely sure.
As far as I know, the current Snapdragon product isn't neuromorphic, isn't event-based, doesn't operate at ultra-low power, and doesnât support real-time on-device learning.
Judd Heape, VP of Product Management for Camera, Computer Vision, and Video at Qualcomm Technologies, was quoted in a June 2023 EE Times article saying, âThese event-based sensors are much more efficient because they can be programmed to easily detect motion at very low power. When thereâs no movement or change in the scene, the sensor consumes almost no power. So thatâs really interesting to us.â
In that context, he was referring to Prophesee and image-based sensors, but the underlying principle still applies I would have thoughtâevent-based sensors just make sense. And AKIDA is event-based.
We also know that a drone company is exploring a combination of AKIDA and Propheseeâs camera. Not Snapdragon. That says something.
So why wouldnât Qualcomm want to integrate our technology to gain a foothold in new marketsâespecially ones that are battery-powered and highly power-constrained? Surely paying for a licence would be chicken feed for the likes of Qualcomm, so I honestly don't know why they wouldn't be considering it.
Maybe someone with deeper technical insight can weigh in here.
View attachment 81620
EETimes article about Prophesee-Qualcomm deal
Full article here: https://www.eetimes.com/experts-weigh-impact-of-prophesee-qualcomm-deal/ Experts Weigh Impact of Prophesee-Qualcomm Deal ...image-sensors-world.blogspot.com
Manny100 some good new I feel after emailing Tony to ask if he could find out what brainchip thoughts were in this latest Qualcomm stopping Brainchip and the response is as followsIf Qualcomm want a piece of Neuromorphic at the Edge they will look to us.
The great thing about BRN from a client point of view is they can use 1000 knowing that they can move up fairly seamlessly to Gen2/TENNs as they improve existing or develop new products..
In the meantime just like us maybe Qualcomm are waiting until Edge AI demand picks up significantly before getting serious.
Thanks, much appreciated, cheersManny100 some good new I feel after emailing Tony to ask if he could find out what brainchip thoughts were in this latest Qualcomm stopping Brainchip and the response is as follows
I referred your email to our CTO Dr Tony Lewis. He replied to me that this was a temporary situation as Qualcomm had to review all contracts and commercial arrangements. He said he was not concerned