BRN Discussion Ongoing

[manny100]

OK ...This is all going on at HC....Thoughts???? Interesting!!!

View attachment 83400
View attachment 83401
View attachment 83402
All a bit strange!!!!

I think we know by now if it's from the crapper it is crap.
Taking a step back posters having multiple 'aliases'/poster names to push a personal agenda is not uncommon on the crapper.
Would Louis De Nardo as an ex CEO really get involved in BOD elections at all......... let alone the low-class crapper.
No chance.
Its a laughable attempt by a shorter/trader to cause problems.

 

[7für7]

Let’s assume for a moment that it really is him. I find it highly unprofessional for a former CEO to post such a contradictory and emotionally charged message in one of the most controversial forums. First, he paints a dramatic picture of retail investors facing disaster—then he claims to be positive and confident that a major deal is near. Which is it?

Why now? Why not raise these concerns months ago when they could’ve been discussed rationally—without influencing people right before an important vote? This feels manipulative and poorly timed, regardless of his past contributions to the company.

And honestly, it’s not up to us to prove whether it’s really him. If he has something important to say, he should do it through verified, official channels. Until then, I consider it just another unverified post. An email address isn’t enough—he carries the burden of proof.
Maybe something like “Akida is in every Mercedes” or “the switch is basically Akida…but the name switch is already a well known brand.. soo…”

 

[Guzzi62]

Non Executive Director....

Thanks.

We already have a director so I don't see his purpose other than stirring sxxx up!

 

[Getupthere]

Let’s assume for a moment that it really is him. I find it highly unprofessional for a former CEO to post such a contradictory and emotionally charged message in one of the most controversial forums. First, he paints a dramatic picture of retail investors facing disaster—then he claims to be positive and confident that a major deal is near. Which is it?

Why now? Why not raise these concerns months ago when they could’ve been discussed rationally—without influencing people right before an important vote? This feels manipulative and poorly timed, regardless of his past contributions to the company.

And honestly, it’s not up to us to prove whether it’s really him. If he has something important to say, he should do it through verified, official channels. Until then, I consider it just another unverified post. An email address isn’t enough—he carries the burden of proof.
Maybe something like “Akida is in every Mercedes” or “the switch is basically Akida…but the name switch is already a well known brand.. soo…”

Sure, if it is him, he’s no longer CEO and has every right to speak as a shareholder.
But let’s not ignore the fact that this post comes after 3.5 years of Sean leading the company. Maybe he, like many others, feels that’s been more than enough time to start delivering real, consistent results from the 5-year plan.

 

[Kingkong2015]

Short sellers are desperate now—resorting to scams by pretending to be an ex-director. I just called him, and he confirmed it’s a scam.

 

[7für7]

May I have your attention, please?
May I have your attention, please?
Will the real De Nardo please stand up?
I repeat, will the real De Nardo please stand up?
We’re gonna have a problem here…

 

[jrp173]

Short sellers are desperate now—resorting to scams by pretending to be an ex-director. I just called him, and he confirmed it’s a scam.

you're funny....

 

[HopalongPetrovski]

I just called Donald Trump and he told me "He's the greatest thing since sliced bread and all women love him and BrainChip is going to be the biggest thing ever!" TrueLie.

 

[7für7]

I just called Donald Trump and he told me "He's the greatest thing since sliced bread and all women love him and BrainChip is going to be the biggest thing ever!" TrueLie.

I called Chuck Norris and he did not pick up. But as soon as he call me back I will let you guys know if all this is true!

 

[Jefwilto]

I think we know by now if it's from the crapper it is crap.
Taking a step back posters having multiple 'aliases'/poster names to push a personal agenda is not uncommon on the crapper.
Would Louis De Nardo as an ex CEO really get involved in BOD elections at all......... let alone the low-class crapper.
No chance.
Its a laughable attempt by a shorter/trader to cause problems.

Do some research Man its Lou

 

[JDelekto]

I think we know by now if it's from the crapper it is crap.
Taking a step back posters having multiple 'aliases'/poster names to push a personal agenda is not uncommon on the crapper.
Would Louis De Nardo as an ex CEO really get involved in BOD elections at all......... let alone the low-class crapper.
No chance.
Its a laughable attempt by a shorter/trader to cause problems.

With some critical thinking and some Google searches, all the content in that post can be verified as publicly available information, with the exception of the poster's opinion. The e-mail address, number of shares held (at least from older documentation), divisions worked, etc., can be found through a search, with each piece of information seeking to give credibility to a potentially anonymous poster.

Is this something they would write? Is their writing style the same from any past postings or public writings? Would they even engage in stock forums with other anonymous posters? Was anything signed between them and the company to keep them from providing certain information about the company or their tenure to stockholders?

The person posting may be taking a gamble that nobody would engage with the provided e-mail address. However, if one does, they should include the context of the posting in the forum as verification.

 

[Jefwilto]

Short sellers are desperate now—resorting to scams by pretending to be an ex-director. I just called him, and he confirmed it’s a scam.

With some critical thinking and some Google searches, all the content in that post can be verified as publicly available information, with the exception of the poster's opinion. The e-mail address, number of shares held (at least from older documentation), divisions worked, etc., can be found through a search, with each piece of information seeking to give credibility to a potentially anonymous poster.

Is this something they would write? Is their writing style the same from any past postings or public writings? Would they even engage in stock forums with other anonymous posters? Was anything signed between them and the company to keep them from providing certain information about the company or their tenure to stockholders?

The person posting may be taking a gamble that nobody would engage with the provided e-mail address. However, if one does, they should include the context of the posting in the forum as verification.

JD its him,do some simple research,and you can easily confirm it is,i did,and i am satisfied it is,as i did think it was not true,but it is Lou,and i think the fact that he is now willing to put himself out there,says a lot in itself.

 

[TECH]

The BrainChip 2025 Summer Internship Program is out.

As every year, the University of Washington’s Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering is encouraging their students to apply - and in previous years, a number of UW students did in fact succeed in landing an internship with our company.

Sadly, though, as usual, this document would have benefitted from proper proofreading pre-publication, sigh…
“XX projects we are looking for Interns”?!
And Project 4 is missing altogether?!

Depending on their respective project, the incoming summer interns will be assigned to various BrainChip engineers such as Ritik Shrivastava (a UW alumnus himself), Dhvani Kothari, Kurt Manninen…


The project I found especially intriguing is

Project 8: Neuromorphic Compute in the Cloud
Leverage cloud FPGAs for large scale event based computation

Objectives:
To design and implement a large scale neuromorphic event-based network on a cloud FPGA infrastructure

Description: BrainChip currently has multiple neuromorphic architectures which run on local FPGAs. This limits the size and location of networks for testing and demonstration. In this project, we would take one architecture and scale it up to very large size, and run it on cloud FPGAs from Amazon or Intel.
(…)

Brainchip: 2025 Internship Program – Posted 4/28

Brainchip’s 2025 Internship Program.

advisingblog.ece.uw.edu

View attachment 83391

https://wp.ece.uw.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2025/04/Brainchip-Internship-Projects-2025.pdf

View attachment 83392 View attachment 83393 View attachment 83394 View attachment 83395


View attachment 83396

View attachment 83398

Thanks for posting this.

Despite the odd mistake/error it is overall a good professional presentation, it's very, very clear that we are still going for it!

This is exactly what Peter told me, Tony doesn't mess around, he is a straight shooter, has the company's best interests at heart
and is going for it, reaching out to young up and comers, the future generation of brilliant, creative, inquisitive minds.

Wouldn't you expect a leading company like ours in this specialized field to be chasing top potential, of course you would be!
And without these future minds, we would stall, as time waits for no one.

Tony (and the team) is representing us professionally, no question about it, that recent podcast was great, relaxed, laughing, but getting the message across that Brainchip has the technology and we intend making it as easy as possible to integrate into other companies' architecture,
yes, some criticism is justified, but try to keep on focusing on the end game, no other company in my opinion has passed us to date.

And, that latest announcement out of Taiwan, dare I say it again......our mate AKD 1000 shines yet again....to narrow, my.............se.

Regards....Texta

 

[DK6161]

Just got an email to confirm it is him!
Check out this LinkedIn snip

 

[JDelekto]

JD its him,do some simple research,and you can easily confirm it is,i did,and i am satisfied it is,as i did think it was not true,but it is Lou,and i think the fact that he is now willing to put himself out there,says a lot in itself.

I firmly believe that you believe who this person says they are. As you stated, I have researched and found all the information in that post publicly available, so I approach it with a healthy dose of skepticism. Social engineering is a very real and sometimes frightening reality.

Unless I met him personally and had him confirm they posted that, or better yet, get confirmation from senior management at BrainChip that has access to his current contact information and can verify that post, I will still remain skeptical.

 

[jrp173]

JD its him,do some simple research,and you can easily confirm it is,i did,and i am satisfied it is,as i did think it was not true,but it is Lou,and i think the fact that he is now willing to put himself out there,says a lot in itself.

Yes it is Lou. It's getting really boring listening to all the whining that it's not Lou, when a simple message via his LinkedIn profile would prove it to any normal person (or by emailing and engaging with him).

Unfortunately there many people that are so stuck in their opinions, they refuse to consider anything else.

Those like yourself that are genuinely interested with do the homework themselves to verify it is Lou.

 

[Wags]

Just got an email to confirm it is him!
Check out this LinkedIn snip

You have just confirmed / advertised your true self, seeya

 

[DK6161]

You have just confirmed / advertised your true self, seeya

I am sad that you can't take a joke, Pal.

WE ALL have been losing money, so take a chill pill

 

[HopalongPetrovski]

 

[Slade]

Pay Tony Lewis whatever he wants, we can’t afford to lose him. Deduct the amount from Antonio, Pia or Duy-Loan Le.