BRN Discussion Ongoing

sb182

Member
He's pissed off, arrogant and desperate by the sounds of things.
Yep, sounds just like our CEO Sean.
 
  • Love
Reactions: 1 users

schuey

Regular
  • Fire
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
"A company is not obligated to retell the entire origin story of its technology, complete with the names of every former contributor, every time it announces a new partnership"


So where does this leave our founders???

Are you saying.......Fk them????

And our current CTO seems to disagree with your view! Do you want to crush him as well????
Hi FJ

Is understandable that Olivier may want to market his skills.

Especially via LinkedIn which is a business / individual networking site not so much just a job board site equivalent.

As someone said earlier, we don't know why he's out of BC but generally there's 3 reasons someone no longer works somewhere.

"Own" choice to move on, role is made redundant or dismissed by the company due to breach of terms of employment in some form.

Me personally, when anyone is enjoyed by a business, you're there to fulfil a role and "you get paid" accordingly for that performance.

Once you leave, that's it, you've moved on.

He has recognition through the patents as inventor, through published papers etc.

Can always market or highlight that body of work as part of his accomplishments via LinkedIn and would presume he does.

Fine, comment on a post celebrating a win, that he had a hand in, for the company, but maybe be a little more humble about it rather than passive aggressive and trying to call out the company.

Would all of those people that he and Rudy would have cited or referenced in their work towards nventing Pleiades / Centaurus / TENNs etc expect they should also get accolades or mentions on a success they possibly provided some element of inspiration too?

There's a line somewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users

Diogenese

Top 20
I was just doing some research via Grok regarding the ForwardEdge selection of BrainChip and I loved this for some perspective of the significance:

Lockheed Martin is the world's largest defense contractor (by revenue and influence), so anything it does in trusted U.S. microelectronics, edge AI, or neuromorphic computing gets watched closely by peers (Northrop Grumman, Raytheon (RTX), Boeing, General Dynamics, BAE Systems, and L3Harris).

When Lockheed's ForwardEdge publicly selects a neuromorphic partner like BrainChip for cognitive RF and signal processing in contested environments, it's a clear signal that this tech is passing rigorous defense-grade evaluation (DMEA Trusted IC compliance, low-power edge needs, etc.).

Lockheed's selection of BrainChip is like a "seal of approval" from the biggest player.
... not to mention some amazing results that a little company called IBM has achieved by combining its software with an Akida coprocessor or 10.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 10 users

7For7

Member
"A company is not obligated to retell the entire origin story of its technology, complete with the names of every former contributor, every time it announces a new partnership"


So where does this leave our founders???

Are you saying.......Fk them????

And our current CTO seems to disagree with your view! Do you want to crush him as well????

I think you’re escalating this far beyond what was actually said.
I never said “Fk them,” and you know that.

What I said is that there are limits. As an investor, I do not think it helps the company when former employees publicly insert personal grievances or demands for recognition into every milestone. It unnecessarily casts the company in a negative light.

He was paid for his work, and his contribution is already reflected where it properly belongs — in patents, papers, technical history and the record of the company’s development.

By your logic, should NVIDIA, Microsoft, Intel and every other tech company issue a thank-you note to every former contributor every time they announce a new product, partnership or milestone? Of course not. That is not how serious companies communicate.

And if the CTO responded differently (show me where because I couldn’t see a response on the comment section regarding this post) , my guess is that he was trying to de-escalate, not endorse the idea that every press release should become a public credit list.

Respecting founders and former contributors is one thing. Turning every current announcement into a debate about past recognition is another.

Only my opinion and last comment on this 🙋🏻‍♂️
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Love
Reactions: 6 users

FJ-215

Regular
Hi FJ

Is understandable that Olivier may want to market his skills.

Especially via LinkedIn which is a business / individual networking site not so much just a job board site equivalent.

As someone said earlier, we don't know why he's out of BC but generally there's 3 reasons someone no longer works somewhere.

"Own" choice to move on, role is made redundant or dismissed by the company due to breach of terms of employment in some form.

Me personally, when anyone is enjoyed by a business, you're there to fulfil a role and "you get paid" accordingly for that performance.

Once you leave, that's it, you've moved on.

He has recognition through the patents as inventor, through published papers etc.

Can always market or highlight that body of work as part of his accomplishments via LinkedIn and would presume he does.

Fine, comment on a post celebrating a win, that he had a hand in, for the company, but maybe be a little more humble about it rather than passive aggressive and trying to call out the company.

Would all of those people that he and Rudy would have cited or referenced in their work towards nventing Pleiades / Centaurus / TENNs etc expect they should also get accolades or mentions on a success they possibly provided some element of inspiration too?

There's a line somewhere.
Hi FMF,

We do know why he is no longer at BRN, he was sacked!!!

If BRN is going to continue to market his invention as a key pillar of their technology, then, I believe he has a right to inform all in the market that he is the inventor of that technology.

I don't think I am playing word games here.

If TENNs is what we think it is, maybe we should stop shitting on it's creator???
 
Last edited:

7For7

Member
Kev is in da house


IMG_0876.jpeg
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users

ChrisBRN

Regular
New interview with Sean

 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 11 users

Earlyrelease

Regular
Kev is in da house


View attachment 96367
I know somebody already referenced Skynet but this is getting scarily close to that.
 
Top Bottom