AVZ Discussion 2022

KentCStrait

Regular
I think that figure was 1 billion anyway. The Australian 'journalist' is plucking numbers out of their arse. It's basically fake news, Ill researched, sensationalised, misleading and not factual.
USD$1 billion is equal to AUD$1.5 billion. I think that's where he plucked the figure from.

I think it's important to note The Australian "journalist" is mates with Tom Richardson. They both worked together at AFR. I think that says more than enough about his credibility.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 11 users

cruiser51

Top 20
Agreed, I also think they'll have to come pretty close to matching any offer or risk losing it. They've hopefully shot themselves in the foot at the same time as trying to stich this up.
Well they say with their AI they know pretty well how deep the resource goes.
With all their 'knowledge' the only factor of uncertainty is the DRC Government factor and they say that have that under control with their ceremony master team Trump.
Maybe it is better for them not to be too smart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

protoje

Regular
Well they say with their AI they know pretty well how deep the resource goes.
With all their 'knowledge' the only factor of uncertainty is the DRC Government factor and they say that have that under control with their ceremony master team Trump.
Maybe it is better for them not to be too smart.
Maybe with their AI they can measure the depth of AVZ Shareholder trauma and use AI to include this in their ‘fair value’ calculations…
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

Samus

Top 20
Maybe with their AI they can measure the depth of AVZ Shareholder trauma and use AI to include this in their ‘fair value’ calculations…
1753258803833.gif

1000013337.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users

Samus

Top 20
USD$1 billion is equal to AUD$1.5 billion. I think that's where he plucked the figure from.

I think it's important to note The Australian "journalist" is mates with Tom Richardson. They both worked together at AFR. I think that says more than enough about his credibility.
Regardless it's bullshit, they've linked the figure to AVZ's payout when it was stated as funding for mine development.
The article is so full of shit it's ridiculous, bullshit headline with nothing linking it together.
I can see why management liked the mines.cd article, surprisingly for another bullshit publication they did a better job of laying out the facts.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 8 users
Is there an ‘Investment ideas’ thread? If anyone is interested, check out BHM.ax… it’s a reverse takeover from CBH.ax… Looks to be undervalued IMO and NOT in Africa 😜
 

Shire

Regular
Will report back if I get response
IMG_1854.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 31 users

Dazmac66

Regular
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 29 users

Strongman

Regular
USD$1 billion is equal to AUD$1.5 billion. I think that's where he plucked the figure from.

I think it's important to note The Australian "journalist" is mates with Tom Richardson. They both worked together at AFR. I think that says more than enough about his credibility.
In the article he mentions $1.5 billion plus a royalty. Iam quite sure he is referencing a previous article in the Australian that came out soon after the Kobold AVZ agreement was released on May 6th. Iam unsure of when exactly it was published but it was discussed at length here and on the crapper
Either way the article was as Samus said just a hotchpotch of bullshit. My thoughts on reading the article was that it was exactly the same style as Tolate on the crapper.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 6 users
Is there an ‘Investment ideas’ thread? If anyone is interested, check out BHM.ax… it’s a reverse takeover from CBH.ax… Looks to be undervalued IMO and NOT in Africa 😜
Can you give me an elevator pitch for this bhm?
 

Samus

Top 20
In the article he mentions $1.5 billion plus a royalty. Iam quite sure he is referencing a previous article in the Australian that came out soon after the Kobold AVZ agreement was released on May 6th. Iam unsure of when exactly it was published but it was discussed at length here and on the crapper
Either way the article was as Samus said just a hotchpotch of bullshit. My thoughts on reading the article was that it was exactly the same style as Tolate on the crapper.
And thats where that 67c or whatever bullshit figure came from, where 1.5b US equates to about that in AUD depending on exchange rate at the time.

This time they've stated:
"The Australian has reported that AVZ might walk away with up to $1.5bn and a royalty. However, KoBold clearly wants to pay far less in cash upfront given the risks in the DRC and the depressed lithium market."

Not clearly! what's the source? It's all fucking bullshit!
AVZ would have rejected that figure if it even exists.
Didn't they report that 1.5b was 'the offer' last time 🤯🤯🤯 fmd!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 16 users
Can you give me an elevator pitch for this bhm?
Currently operating mine with way more capacity potential, also a drilling campaign underway, decent shallow grades, tight register, BHMOA are close to convert price and expire 2029… I’ve held CBH for quite a while and was only taken over by BHM a couple of days ago, DYOR!

 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

KentCStrait

Regular
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users

Hudnut

Regular

Flexi

Regular
I think CATH will provide litigation funding to the end to ensure they don't loose the value of the 10% (thereabouts) holding in AVZ to the Americans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

Strongman

Regular
And thats where that 67c or whatever bullshit figure came from, where 1.5b US equates to about that in AUD depending on exchange rate at the time.

This time they've stated:
"The Australian has reported that AVZ might walk away with up to $1.5bn and a royalty. However, KoBold clearly wants to pay far less in cash upfront given the risks in the DRC and the depressed lithium market."

Not clearly! what's the source? It's all fucking bullshit!
AVZ would have rejected that figure if it even exists.
Didn't they report that 1.5b was 'the offer' last time 🤯🤯🤯 fmd!
The whole article is just a fucking joke for sure. Brad Thompson is no better than Tommy the Turd. Where the fuck do they find these guys ??
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 4 users

Dave Evans

Regular
And thats where that 67c or whatever bullshit figure came from, where 1.5b US equates to about that in AUD depending on exchange rate at the time.

This time they've stated:
"The Australian has reported that AVZ might walk away with up to $1.5bn and a royalty. However, KoBold clearly wants to pay far less in cash upfront given the risks in the DRC and the depressed lithium market."

Not clearly! what's the source? It's all fucking bullshit!
AVZ would have rejected that figure if it even exists.
Didn't they report that 1.5b was 'the offer' last time 🤯🤯🤯 fmd!

Sam, you know I keep copies of everything that comes out about AVZ. I’m not really interested in following KoBold’s bullshit anymore, I believe the best thing to do is wait for AVZ’s announcements and trust that Nigel and DLA Piper have the legal high ground and the will to continue fighting for our best outcome.

I personally wouldn’t trust what they print, but here’s the article in question, which appeared to indicate an initial low ball offer and appeared to be deleted soon after it came out 👇

IMG_9289.jpeg

Perth-based AVZ Minerals’ Congo lithium hopes hinge on US envoy’s talks

Brad Thompson

AVZ and KoBold representatives want to nail down a deal on the future of the southern portion of the Manono deposit from the talks starting on Tuesday.

If all goes well, AVZ could on-sell the Manono interest for up to $US1.5bn ($2.38bn) plus a royalty. But there is no assurance of any outcome, favourable or otherwise.

A deal will depend on the US standing up for AVZ’s legal claim over Manono, which AVZ has separately tried to assert through international justice. It is understood California-based KoBold wants to see AVZ “appropriately compensated” for Manono.

The US has indicated it is willing to back AVZ retrieving the southern licence to minimise antagonising China.

KoBold first cast its eye over the southern part of the deposit last October. It was invited to assess the disputed project by DRC-owned mining company Cominiere, which is involved in a legal battle over the asset with AVZ.

The US wants any sale by AVZ to not be complicated by residual links to China’s CATL – the world’s biggest electric vehicle battery manufacturer, which in January provided $20m in funding to AVZ to help the company finance the legal battle for Manono. It is understood both the US and KoBold favour a change of ownership based on the DRC and AVZ discontinuing legal action.


Here’s another article I put a link to recently
which states the following about their Framework Agreement Structure

The Framework Agreement Structure​

KoBold's entry represents a potential breakthrough in this protracted dispute. The company has proposed a framework agreement that would:
  1. Compensate AVZ Minerals for its initial exploration work and partial claim settlement
  2. Divide the massive deposit geographically – with KoBold developing the southern portion while Zijin retains rights to the northern section
  3. Commit $1 billion for project development over a 5-year timeframe
  4. Establish clear boundaries and operational independence between the two zones
This arrangement offers a pragmatic solution that acknowledges the political realities while allowing development to proceed after years of delays. The agreement requires several conditions to be met:
  • Formal regulatory approvals from DRC mining authorities
  • Resolution of pending arbitration cases
  • Environmental impact assessments
  • Community benefit agreements with local stakeholders

Here were the notes I made about what is stated above about the agreement 👇

The initial exploration work they mention above, should take into consideration

1) The updated resources 👇

IMG_9673.jpeg



2) The BFS and Sustainability Report 👇

https://announcements.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20220617/pdf/45b0wzfp5rpg7d.pdf

3) The Partial Award - Being the amount factored in according to the ICC which shows we have suffered damages in excess of US$9.4billion 👇

https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...de+Courtoisie+de+la+Sentence+Partielle_en.pdf


Then the agreement requirements including the first condition to be met being the formal regulatory approvals from DRC mining authorities, which could be what the signing last week was about

IMG_9661.jpeg


The next condition to be met being the resolution of pending arbitration cases.

My view is if KoBold offered us fair value a deal would have been done, so until they do, they won’t get past this condition

Maybe that explains things to shareholders here, maybe not, I don’t really know because all of those parties that are trying not to include us are so full of bullshit that, like I said before, in my view it’s best to wait for AVZ to announce things as our BOD are the only ones who are abiding by the international laws and not talking bullshit.

What I do like that KoBold has done, is make public statements that we can use to hold them accountable and great work by Nigel and DLA Piper putting KoBold’s agreements in the hands of the ICSID

Here’s KoBold’s statement in their own words 👇

KoBold Metals and AVZ Agree on Framework for KoBold to Acquire AVZ’s Interests in the Manono Lithium Deposit in DRC​

Thanks, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, U.S. Senior Advisor for Africa Massad Boulos, and President of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Félix A. Tshisekedi Tshilombo, for opening doors for US investment. KoBold Metals and AVZ Minerals Limited agreed on a framework for KoBold to buy AVZ’s interests in the Manono lithium deposit in the DRC. We’ll make America and the DRC safer, stronger, and more prosperous.

1746638855400-892x1024.jpeg


www.koboldmetals.com


www.koboldmetals.com
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 12 users

Goldenboy

Regular
Sam, you know I keep copies of everything that comes out about AVZ. I’m not really interested in following KoBold’s bullshit anymore, I believe the best thing to do is wait for AVZ’s announcements and trust that Nigel and DLA Piper have the legal high ground and the will to continue fighting for our best outcome.

I personally wouldn’t trust what they print, but here’s the article in question, which appeared to indicate an initial low ball offer and appeared to be deleted soon after it came out 👇

IMG_9289.jpeg

Perth-based AVZ Minerals’ Congo lithium hopes hinge on US envoy’s talks

Brad Thompson

AVZ and KoBold representatives want to nail down a deal on the future of the southern portion of the Manono deposit from the talks starting on Tuesday.

If all goes well, AVZ could on-sell the Manono interest for up to $US1.5bn ($2.38bn) plus a royalty. But there is no assurance of any outcome, favourable or otherwise.

A deal will depend on the US standing up for AVZ’s legal claim over Manono, which AVZ has separately tried to assert through international justice. It is understood California-based KoBold wants to see AVZ “appropriately compensated” for Manono.

The US has indicated it is willing to back AVZ retrieving the southern licence to minimise antagonising China.

KoBold first cast its eye over the southern part of the deposit last October. It was invited to assess the disputed project by DRC-owned mining company Cominiere, which is involved in a legal battle over the asset with AVZ.

The US wants any sale by AVZ to not be complicated by residual links to China’s CATL – the world’s biggest electric vehicle battery manufacturer, which in January provided $20m in funding to AVZ to help the company finance the legal battle for Manono. It is understood both the US and KoBold favour a change of ownership based on the DRC and AVZ discontinuing legal action.


Here’s another article I put a link to recently
which states the following about their Framework Agreement Structure

The Framework Agreement Structure​

KoBold's entry represents a potential breakthrough in this protracted dispute. The company has proposed a framework agreement that would:
  1. Compensate AVZ Minerals for its initial exploration work and partial claim settlement
  2. Divide the massive deposit geographically – with KoBold developing the southern portion while Zijin retains rights to the northern section
  3. Commit $1 billion for project development over a 5-year timeframe
  4. Establish clear boundaries and operational independence between the two zones
This arrangement offers a pragmatic solution that acknowledges the political realities while allowing development to proceed after years of delays. The agreement requires several conditions to be met:
  • Formal regulatory approvals from DRC mining authorities
  • Resolution of pending arbitration cases
  • Environmental impact assessments
  • Community benefit agreements with local stakeholders

Here were the notes I made about what is stated above about the agreement 👇

The initial exploration work they mention above, should take into consideration

1) The updated resources 👇

IMG_9673.jpeg



2) The BFS and Sustainability Report 👇

https://announcements.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20220617/pdf/45b0wzfp5rpg7d.pdf

3) The Partial Award - Being the amount factored in according to the ICC which shows we have suffered damages in excess of US$9.4billion 👇

https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...de+Courtoisie+de+la+Sentence+Partielle_en.pdf


Then the agreement requirements including the first condition to be met being the formal regulatory approvals from DRC mining authorities, which could be what the signing last week was about

View attachment 88818

The next condition to be met being the resolution of pending arbitration cases.

My view is if KoBold offered us fair value a deal would have been done, so until they do, they won’t get past this condition

Maybe that explains things to shareholders here, maybe not, I don’t really know because all of those parties that are trying not to include us are so full of bullshit that, like I said before, in my view it’s best to wait for AVZ to announce things as our BOD are the only ones who are abiding by the international laws and not talking bullshit.

What I do like that KoBold has done, is make public statements that we can use to hold them accountable and great work by Nigel and DLA Piper putting KoBold’s agreements in the hands of the ICSID

Here’s KoBold’s statement in their own words 👇

KoBold Metals and AVZ Agree on Framework for KoBold to Acquire AVZ’s Interests in the Manono Lithium Deposit in DRC​

Thanks, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, U.S. Senior Advisor for Africa Massad Boulos, and President of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Félix A. Tshisekedi Tshilombo, for opening doors for US investment. KoBold Metals and AVZ Minerals Limited agreed on a framework for KoBold to buy AVZ’s interests in the Manono lithium deposit in the DRC. We’ll make America and the DRC safer, stronger, and more prosperous.

1746638855400-892x1024.jpeg


www.koboldmetals.com


www.koboldmetals.com
Dave …. Look forward to the day you do a podcast about this shitshow. 🙏🏻
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

Strongman

Regular
Sam, you know I keep copies of everything that comes out about AVZ. I’m not really interested in following KoBold’s bullshit anymore, I believe the best thing to do is wait for AVZ’s announcements and trust that Nigel and DLA Piper have the legal high ground and the will to continue fighting for our best outcome.

I personally wouldn’t trust what they print, but here’s the article in question, which appeared to indicate an initial low ball offer and appeared to be deleted soon after it came out 👇

IMG_9289.jpeg

Perth-based AVZ Minerals’ Congo lithium hopes hinge on US envoy’s talks

Brad Thompson

AVZ and KoBold representatives want to nail down a deal on the future of the southern portion of the Manono deposit from the talks starting on Tuesday.

If all goes well, AVZ could on-sell the Manono interest for up to $US1.5bn ($2.38bn) plus a royalty. But there is no assurance of any outcome, favourable or otherwise.

A deal will depend on the US standing up for AVZ’s legal claim over Manono, which AVZ has separately tried to assert through international justice. It is understood California-based KoBold wants to see AVZ “appropriately compensated” for Manono.

The US has indicated it is willing to back AVZ retrieving the southern licence to minimise antagonising China.

KoBold first cast its eye over the southern part of the deposit last October. It was invited to assess the disputed project by DRC-owned mining company Cominiere, which is involved in a legal battle over the asset with AVZ.

The US wants any sale by AVZ to not be complicated by residual links to China’s CATL – the world’s biggest electric vehicle battery manufacturer, which in January provided $20m in funding to AVZ to help the company finance the legal battle for Manono. It is understood both the US and KoBold favour a change of ownership based on the DRC and AVZ discontinuing legal action.


Here’s another article I put a link to recently
which states the following about their Framework Agreement Structure

The Framework Agreement Structure​

KoBold's entry represents a potential breakthrough in this protracted dispute. The company has proposed a framework agreement that would:
  1. Compensate AVZ Minerals for its initial exploration work and partial claim settlement
  2. Divide the massive deposit geographically – with KoBold developing the southern portion while Zijin retains rights to the northern section
  3. Commit $1 billion for project development over a 5-year timeframe
  4. Establish clear boundaries and operational independence between the two zones
This arrangement offers a pragmatic solution that acknowledges the political realities while allowing development to proceed after years of delays. The agreement requires several conditions to be met:
  • Formal regulatory approvals from DRC mining authorities
  • Resolution of pending arbitration cases
  • Environmental impact assessments
  • Community benefit agreements with local stakeholders

Here were the notes I made about what is stated above about the agreement 👇

The initial exploration work they mention above, should take into consideration

1) The updated resources 👇

IMG_9673.jpeg



2) The BFS and Sustainability Report 👇

https://announcements.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20220617/pdf/45b0wzfp5rpg7d.pdf

3) The Partial Award - Being the amount factored in according to the ICC which shows we have suffered damages in excess of US$9.4billion 👇

https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...de+Courtoisie+de+la+Sentence+Partielle_en.pdf


Then the agreement requirements including the first condition to be met being the formal regulatory approvals from DRC mining authorities, which could be what the signing last week was about

View attachment 88818

The next condition to be met being the resolution of pending arbitration cases.

My view is if KoBold offered us fair value a deal would have been done, so until they do, they won’t get past this condition

Maybe that explains things to shareholders here, maybe not, I don’t really know because all of those parties that are trying not to include us are so full of bullshit that, like I said before, in my view it’s best to wait for AVZ to announce things as our BOD are the only ones who are abiding by the international laws and not talking bullshit.

What I do like that KoBold has done, is make public statements that we can use to hold them accountable and great work by Nigel and DLA Piper putting KoBold’s agreements in the hands of the ICSID

Here’s KoBold’s statement in their own words 👇

KoBold Metals and AVZ Agree on Framework for KoBold to Acquire AVZ’s Interests in the Manono Lithium Deposit in DRC​

Thanks, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, U.S. Senior Advisor for Africa Massad Boulos, and President of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Félix A. Tshisekedi Tshilombo, for opening doors for US investment. KoBold Metals and AVZ Minerals Limited agreed on a framework for KoBold to buy AVZ’s interests in the Manono lithium deposit in the DRC. We’ll make America and the DRC safer, stronger, and more prosperous.

1746638855400-892x1024.jpeg


www.koboldmetals.com


www.koboldmetals.com
Awesome Dave. Thankyou
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Top Bottom