The fact that discussions are occurring with recently appointed key cabinet ministers is positive. There did not seem to be any progress with the existing ministers. Therefore any change here is good. We don't know if the new ministers may have been exposed to the Chinese influence in relation to this project yet. There may be more chance of progress.
The fact that the recently appointed ministers have been tasked with investigating the purported administrative irregularities with DRC's own mining code and IGF findings is also positive. A new perspective would be good. Can't be worse than Adele Kayinda, therefore I see any new appointments as a new chance/possibility.
Support from Australian and other embassies is also positive. Other Embassies who "share a common interest to support investment transparency in Africa's mining industry". It is good that AVZ appear to be getting some support. Possibly from USA who have a lot of influence and power.
I remember reading articles back when Felix was "elected" that USA basically thought the results were falsified. There were suggestions that USA would be interested in providing "support" etc to help DRC run their elections fairly. USA probably want to ensure China do not get all of RDC's resources. I think they could have an impact. USA are coming down hard on China lately, trying to make it really hard for China to manufacture the latest chips etc. There are restrictions on US workers working for Chinese chip manufacturers. USA is also banning sales of key chips to China. So they are putting things in place to restrict China's progress. Hopefully they provide some assistance with regard to battery metals too.
*Fyi, Re:- USA, I see where,
US plans Tanzania trade boost as Kamala Harris tours Africa
The US government announced plans on Thursday to boost exports to Tanzania, where Vice President Kamala Harris was on a visit as part of a diplomatic drive by Washington to strengthen ties with a continent where China and Russia increasingly hold sway.
Harris began her African tour on Sunday in Ghana before flying late on Wednesday to Tanzania’s commercial capital Dar es Salaam, where she is due to hold talks with President Samia Suluhu Hassan later on Thursday.
Her office announced plans to improve trade and other aspects of bilateral relations, including a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM) and the government of Tanzania.
This will facilitate up to $500 million in US export financing to Tanzania to support exports of goods and services in sectors including infrastructure, transportation, digital technology, climate and energy security and power generation.
Harris’s office also highlighted US support for a plan by LifeZone Metals to open a new processing plant in Tanzania.
The facility will use low-emission technology to process nickel and other minerals mined in the East African country, with a view to start delivering battery grade nickel to the United States from 2026, Harris’s office said.
She is due to stay in Tanzania until Friday, when she will depart for Zambia, the final stop on her tour.
Her visit to Dar es Salaam marks a return to international engagement by Tanzania under President Hassan, after a period of isolationism under her predecessor John Magufuli, who cancelled all his ministers’ foreign trips and discouraged travel.
Hassan has won praise internationally for restoring political rights suspended by Magufuli, who died in office in 2021.
He had banned political rallies by anyone other than elected officials, cracked down on Tanzania’s LGBT community and arrested scores of opposition supporters.
He had also rejected Covid-19 vaccines and urged Tanzanians to put faith in prayer and remedies such as steam inhalation.
Hassan reversed the policies upon coming to power with a Covid-19 vaccination drive and earlier this month, Tanzania passed the milestone of fully vaccinating 50% of its population.
mining.com
Australia risks losing pole position in critical minerals race
Australia is at risk of losing its head start in critical minerals processing because it has not yet laid down a national strategy, even as other governments are splashing out incentives to grab market share and bolster security.
Supplier of nearly half of the world’s lithium, Australia is also the world’s third-largest cobalt exporter and a significant producer of rare earths, copper, graphite, manganese and other minerals key to the global energy transition.
However, those minerals are largely processed in China, including into materials essential in batteries and magnets for products from electric vehicles to missiles.
Western nations want to ease its grip after supply was disrupted during the covid-19 pandemic.
Consultants say Australia should at least move to producing the chemicals and battery active materials needed for cell manufacturing.
“There are lots of discussions and talk on various domiciles wanting to move forward, but ultimately it’s all about actions,” Pilbara Minerals CEO Dale Henderson told Reuters.
The Grattan Institute, a think tank, estimates the critical minerals industry could add more than $400 billion to the economy by 2050, a bigger contribution than the coal industry, Australia’s no.2 export, today.
Industry executives are calling for a national strategy to speed that development by fast-tracking permitting, and offering preferential access to industrial land and subsidies, among other measures.
They want rapid action in light of new competition from the US, Canada and the European Union, which have laid out critical minerals strategies including billions of dollars in incentives.
BHP Group’s CEO Mike Henry told media last month Australia was at risk of other countries moving to “eat our lunch”.
Aid needed
With Canberra’s help, Australia needs to play to its strengths, which include having abundant renewable energy sources and being a reliable supplier to its global partners, consultants say.
The government has provided more than A$250 million ($167 million) in support to Pilbara Minerals, the country’s biggest independent lithium miner, which approved a lithium expansion in Western Australia on Tuesday.
CEO Henderson said he was encouraged by federal and state efforts, but added: “Of course, the government could always do more.”
In the first ministerial round table on critical minerals strategy in three years, state and federal ministers last week agreed development of the sector was a national priority, discussed how to support growth, and committed to hold regular round tables, Resources Minister Madeleine King said.
King said on Wednesday a critical minerals strategy would be released “soon”.
However the government has not said when it would deliver its national battery strategy.
“There is a window of opportunity to become a key player in battery manufacturing here in Australia,” Industry Minister Ed Husic said last week.
“We cannot let it close.”
Funding hurdles
Australia has battled to overcome its reputation as a supplier of raw materials that fails at manufacturing, partly because its distance from major markets means it struggles to build scale to overcome high labour costs.
While major players, including BHP, Tianqi Lithium Corp and Albemarle Corp, are building up operations that will turn ore into battery chemicals, for smaller players the key obstacle is funding.
Making the right product grades consistently is also a challenge. Bankers are wary of lending to a capital-hungry sector developing new technologies, especially to companies with small balance sheets, typical of the sector, executives said.
Cobalt Blue Holdings Ltd, with a market value of A$140 million, won a small grant and fast-track permitting status but still faces a funding shortfall and wants government assistance to secure a refinery site for its A$560 million project, investor relations manager Joel Crane said.
“One of the largest issues we face is project funding,” Crane said.
Arafura Rare Earths, capitalized at A$1.1 billion, is counting on loans from the Australian and German governments to fund more than half its A$1.8 billion Nolans mine and processing plants.
“The elements for an effective critical minerals strategy are in place. The challenge is to stitch them together and deliver. This is a once-in-a-century opportunity,” the Grattan Institute said in a report last month.
mining.com
More Food for thought on a Friday night
Cheers
Frank
