Xerof
Flaming 1967
long time lurker.
Not sure if its discussed, I was playing around with http://drclicences.cami.cd/ and found that you can actually query the database through rest services like below.
https://services.arcgis.com/X3EAXocno9eyvCvV/ArcGIS/rest/services/DRCPortal_OthersLayer_1/FeatureServer/2/query?where=(parties+LIKE+'%dathcom%')+or+(code+LIKE+'%dathcom%')+or+(comments+LIKE+'%dathcom%')&objectIds=&time=&geometry=&geometryType=esriGeometryEnvelope&inSR=&spatialRel=esriSpatialRelIntersects&resultType=none&distance=0.0&units=esriSRUnit_Meter&relationParam=&returnGeodetic=false&outFields=*&returnGeometry=true&returnCentroid=false&featureEncoding=esriDefault&multipatchOption=xyFootprint&maxAllowableOffset=&geometryPrecision=&outSR=&defaultSR=&datumTransformation=&applyVCSProjection=false&returnIdsOnly=false&returnUniqueIdsOnly=false&returnCountOnly=false&returnExtentOnly=false&returnQueryGeometry=false&returnDistinctValues=false&cacheHint=false&orderByFields=DteExpires+desc&groupByFieldsForStatistics=&outStatistics=&having=&resultOffset=&resultRecordCount=&returnZ=false&returnM=false&returnExceededLimitFeatures=true&quantizationParameters=&sqlFormat=none&f=html&token=8HkQfg-k_qEs_QnyuCl4aiaXxWic7lytxbwYsB7vzMdQE8nx6OscTzAiQwOsFzNUt-Dki_y6bPtYLJZFZq4xMkE5C4MDVign21AJ1jMTnHRu9G3PuApF0wsCHo_woMfaq1qIZTgBP7ZnIOLkdPfkaA..
It does give you some extra information/columns that is not avaiable on the portal. Hope its useful to someone.
View attachment 37948
It's a very good question mate.
I think we've all been expecting a response but so far nothing.
The only thing I've heard is that NF has said, unofficially, that we shouldn't take what the cami site says too seriously.
I've asked some more privy holders the same thing and that's all they got.
Not long ago someone on twitter posted their data digging of cami and found it still under the name Dathcom.
I think it was Jens who commented that the change might just be Window dressing.
It happened when Cominiere announced they're cancelling the JV, so I expect it was a part of that attempt.
But I feel like it's very uncool for management to have remained silent over the matter, I mean it's real very fucking concerning to shareholders.
Even if they don't know what's going on themselves they should have responded to it immediately
Poor form, really poor form.
@Azzler
this is the post you refer to on data digging
I tried to get down the rabbit hole, but my arse got stuck at the entrance, and couldn't delve any deeper.
I wonder if @mooorning could run the query as of today and see if the result is the same ( or anyone else who knows how to use a computer, lol)