Cumquat Cap
Regular
Felix is awfully close to Manono in the context of the DRC (circa 700 kilometres away still) - any chance he swings through Manono on this tour? Doubtful but would be nice
Are you expecting them to show up ?New Countdown........yes another countdown.......but short and sweet..
View attachment 46222 .................to the start of ICC hearing
Yes. They are the claimants. Any further delays by them and the ICC will throw out their case imoAre you expecting them to show up ?
AVZ states that: "The ICC Tribunal is determining the issue of jurisdiction as a preliminary question". I interpret preliminary question as part of pre trial investigation? If so then perhaps a month? I'd like to think its faster given how idiotic the whole thing is. Wheels of justice turn SLOWLY.Am I wrong to assume the ICC hearing will be over in 2 days, but a verdict will be another one of those 3 months things which may or may not get delayed again.....?
Still it wouldnt surprise me if they were a no show. Just my musings but their goal wouldnt be to win through ICC ( they smart enough to know that ) . Id guess the tactic is to delay, delay delay while they work in the back ground to tunnel under us undermining the supports and taking us that way. MMGA a good example of thatYes. They are the claimants. Any further delays by them and the ICC will throw out their case imo
Its Zijin, you honestly think they give a shit about making a mockery of the system?If they don't show they lose the jurisdictional case as they're the claimant I would've thought? Otherwise it makes a total mockery of the ICC (i.e bring on case with no intention to allow it to be adjudicated). Think their timing is rapidly running out re stalling
100% . Zijin have achieved 18 months of stalling and over $40 mil of AVZ spending . Round 1 to Zijin . Well actually we were told this case has nothing to do with AVZ being awarded the ML . So where is the f--king ML ? Unless Felix /MoM are prepared to make a change these court cases are just p1ssing in the wind . Felix promoted CKK for being a thief and a corrupt c--t .Still it wouldnt surprise me if they were a no show. Just my musings but their goal wouldnt be to win through ICC ( they smart enough to know that ) . Id guess the tactic is to delay, delay delay while they work in the back ground to tunnel under us undermining the supports and taking us that way. MMGA a good example of that
Were you looking for this:Don't know whether this has already been posted here but this is from cruiser on HC.
We need to wait and see how the DRC gov react . Hopefully Felix is waiting on a decision by the ICC to act in AVZ favour . Time will tell .Zijin don't give a shit - ICC certaintly will - fucking embarrassment of the system.
The preliminary question is the jurisdictional challenge by AVZ that Jin Cheng is not (and never has been) a party of Dathcom. If AVZ wins then it is game over for Zijin and there will be no main trial as it will confirm they do not have the right to initiate arbitration and all their claims are just made up bullshit. Bon chance bitches.AVZ states that: "The ICC Tribunal is determining the issue of jurisdiction as a preliminary question". I interpret preliminary question as part of pre trial investigation? If so then perhaps a month? I'd like to think its faster given how idiotic the whole thing is. Wheels of justice turn SLOWLY.
No main trial, or no main trial at the ICC? If that's the case, then why did AVZ in their earlier ASX announcement state that there would need to be seperate proceedings to rule on the merits of the sale to JC, should this jurisdictional challenge succeed? This one stumped me a little. Perhaps they mean the proceedings against Cominiere?The preliminary question is the jurisdictional challenge by AVZ that Jin Cheng is not (and never has been) a party of Dathcom. If AVZ wins then it is game over for Zijin and there will be no main trial as it will confirm they do not have the right to initiate arbitration and all their claims are just made up bullshit. Bon chance bitches.
It did me at first too. But it was explained in the announcement last week. That question is part of our case at the ICC with Cominiere who are the party within Dathcom responsible for the breach of our preemptive right.No main trial, or no main trial at the ICC? If that's the case, then why did AVZ in their earlier ASX announcement state that there would need to be seperate proceedings to rule on the merits of the sale to JC, should this jurisdictional challenge succeed? This one stumped me a little
The fact that the ICC refused to merge these cases plus the damages case brought by Zijin and Cominiere against AVZ is bad news bears for Zijin imoIt did me at first too. But it was explained in the announcement last week. That question is part of our case at the ICC with Cominiere who are the party within Dathcom responsible for the breach of our preemptive right.
View attachment 46240
View attachment 46241
Nice one Carlos - you're a gun as always.It did me at first too. But it was explained in the announcement last week. That question is part of our case at the ICC with Cominiere who are the party within Dathcom responsible for the breach of our preemptive right.
View attachment 46240
View attachment 46241