BRICK
Where’s Zeebot 😶🌫️
I bet I can fit this microphone right up my ass through my mouth….
Schluuurrrppp
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
Schluuurrrppp
Dave Evans
Regular
I don’t know how to add captions to photos but how about
“I took a bribe from Zijin, ripped the DRC off $120 million and stole this from Dathcom after AVZ spent $100 million developing it”
Dave Evans
Regular
Or how about
“I’m a lying dog that takes bribes and rips off my own country and it’s people”
Dave Evans
Regular
Xerof
Flaming 1967
Zijin shit fighting still goes on elsewhere. This has been over 5 years now. They tried to sneak a tenement holding past the keeper by registering the 'new' company using the same registration number as the 'old' company.
Just for the records, they are a law unto themselves
Just for the records, they are a law unto themselves
Last edited:
Xerof
Flaming 1967
thats apparently the G Spot, but I'm buggered if I can find it
" This is where I want you to bury the cash . "
Cumquat Cap
Regular
So Zijin are drilling the north, our Management seem to not be phased by this but it worries me greatly - they are purposely making themselves entrenched yet Nigel says no worries, assume that's just a front and do not trust his judgement given what he has said the last 2 years.
These guys care little for international laws its fkn mental
These guys care little for international laws its fkn mental
9cardomaha
Regular
ZJ v AVZ - ICC
Claim: AVZ does not recognize Zijin as a shareholder in Dathcom (15% ROFR)
Sep 2023 - hearing on jurisdiction completed
Nov 2023 - submissions on jurisdiction
Feb 2024 - verdict on jurisdiction - likely to rule in our favour
Nov 2023 - emergency submission to throw the case out in light of 15775 and the return of shares in Dathcom.
Dec 2023 - ruling on emergency submission to throw the case out - pending, but unlikely
AVZ v Dathomir - ICC
Claim: 10% from Dathomir which has been illegally terminated
Oct 2023 - provisional measures requested by AVZ to remove Dathomir's request to dissolve DATHCOM JV (given it is no longer part of the JV)
Verdict pending, highly likely to rule in our favour, Jan 2024
AVZ v Dathomir - ICC
Claim: 5% from Dathomir which has been illegally terminated
DLA requested consolidation with the above case to address all 15% at once.
Verdict will likely come alongside the provisional measures, likely to consolidate.
AVZ v Cominiere - ICC
Claim: Cominiere illegally terminated JVA and breached contractual obligations (including ROFR)
May 2023 - Emergency injunction 1 granted, 50k euros daily penalty for any action cominiere takes with adverse effects to Dathcom
Nov 2023 - Emergency injunction 2 granted, additional 50K penalty which now includes 15775 and restricts cominiere from working on the tenement
Dec 2023 - Panel constituted and hearing on measures for enforcement.
Verdict likely to come mid Jan 2024 on the enforcement of Emergency Injunction, before going into other remedies and issues
Cominiere + ZJ v AVZ - ICC
Claim: AVZ triggered ministerial decree 00031, and detractors claiming damages of $1b
Sep 2023 - ICC refused ZJ's request to delay and consolidate case with ZJ v AVZ.
Dec 2023 - Tribunal to be constituted followed by submissions
Verdict won't come till late 2024 - pure fund drainer IMO
AVZ v DRC - ICSID
Claim: DRC breached mining code and unlawful termination of 13359
Oct 2023 - AVZ files emergency request to maintain status quo
Nov 2023 - ICSID takes note of ICC and issues provisional measures to be heard in Dec 2023
Dec 2023 - first virtual hearing 11th Dec
Verdict will come before Christmas to order complete stop of development at Manono by companies other than Dathcom.
9cardomaha
Regular
It's the way Fasken has been arguing the cases - ZJ is not part of the proceedings, so the Arbitrator does not have the authority to order their subsidiary to stop works. Cominiere sitting idle but ZJ continuing to drill is technically not in breach of the injunction etc.
But ZJ communicating with Cominiere and CKK the dumbfuck keeps posting 'their' magnificent work on X.... So let's get to enforcement of EA and then see who's laughing.
My comment on Fasken getting in on ICSID being not ideal for us still remains true, but i don't think ICSID will say it doesn't have jursidiction.... So bring on provisional measures from ICSID and then apply international legal pressure on ZJ not just Cominere.
Cumquat Cap
Regular
Fantastic summary - do we think ICSID provisional measures (assume we're successful based on ICC winning) would be enough to stop Cominiere/Z drilling on our tenement?
IMO the North is long gone . My argument months ago(along with a few others ) was give them CDL if it means we can keep RD . Looks to me like that might now be the compromise we have to make . At this point I'd rather a decent offer $$$$ if it's an option ( above ATH ). No one is going to trust these c--ts even if we get a ML . DRC /China can drag this out for as long as they want . Nigel needs to secure and guarantee every Share Holder's investment ASAP and get us the f--k out of this situation . I re- watched the interview with Cantor Fitzgerald last night . Nigel's glowing report of the DRC gov and our relationship with them almost made me throw up . IMO
Last edited:
9cardomaha
Regular
95% certain it will stop this shit in its tracks.... but you know those cunts, only tim will tell, hoping it is very aoon though.
If you go into the negotiations from a position of weakness, i don't even think we will be able to retain 75% of RD.... I mentioned the other day Geca is renegotiating their deal with Glencore on copper... DRC upping to 28% stake just because.
We are gaining leverage every day, what we have going on is the best play in my view - its grater wank painful, but the truth.
Your assumption is that DRC, C and ZJ would even offer something resembling RD 75%, which has never even been tabled. Getting the cold shoulder pre-ICSID, and only getting negotiations after ramping up is the proof in the pudding.
Might aswell have voted MMGA in if we just wanted to keep RD, herp derp.
Strictly IMO, everyone has a right to their own opinion, but hindsight for alot of people isn't even 20/20 in this instance.
Dave Evans
Regular
Ahh Wombat, ever the optimist. I wish you had stopped after your joke about where to bury the cash. You’ve been wanting that takeover offer for as long as I can remember. Starting back at around $0.20 if I remember correctly.
No doubt you’ll be telling your grandkids there’s no such thing as Santaclause
9cardomaha
Regular
"And this is where i hit the G-Spot"
Dave Evans
Regular
As you can see, the area my finger is pointing to is the South China Sea
"Might as well have voted MMGA in if we just wanted to keep RD, herp derp."
Mate if MMGA could have 100% guaranteed RD and the ML they might have stood a chance .
Nothing wrong with a TO at the right price .
As for my grandkids . The $200k I have invested in AVZ is for them .
Similar threads
