JDelekto
Regular
I believe this is spot on. The financial gurus will count on the technical analysis of BrainChip's stock, while those with a technical background will see the potential in BrainChip's technology. Until we see more event-driven sensors become available (cameras are the big thing right now), people may not have the vision to see what Akida's true capabilities can be.In assessing a pre-revenue tech company, it is important to take account of the technical and marketing progress of the company as well as its financials. Buying into a pre-revenue tech startup cannot be based on the financials. It can only be based on the perceived market potential. That can be problematic where there is no established market for the tech. Basically all you have to go on is the company press releases, potential customer reactions, and the assessment of commentators experienced in the field. The comments of ananymous blog posters should be taken heavily salted. By the same token, using financials as the primary assessment tool for pre-revenue startups will always yield the same result, but consistency does not equate to accuracy.
The annual "losses" are investments in the company's future. Most of the money goes on R&D and marketing and the necessary management and support.
I dream of an Akida architecture orchestrating a multi-sensor system capable of learning and recognizing new things out in the field, sharing what it's learned with other Akida-based hardware autonomously, without needing any cloud-based resources. It can be nightmare fuel for some, but a great opportunity for others.