HopalongPetrovski
I'm Spartacus!
Hi Dodgy.Hi Hoppy,
The sad fact is that the company gets $0.00 from shares bought on market. IPO aside, it is only when new shares are offered that the company gets any money from share sales.
I'd like to see a system where the company gets a small percent of each on market sale. That way, bot trading and shorting would provide some little benefit the company.
It's good to get a couple of radar partnerships in a couple of days. Tony Lewis linked the ILS partnership with TENNs. I think that the Raytheon/AFRL micro-doppler project will also employ TENNs.
Funny thing, the SBIR site has a short memory: (Maybe they are using Signal.)
https://www.islinc.com/national-security
,,,
ISL has an impressive record of transitioning advanced technologies to the field. In the last few years alone, ISL has been awarded three (3) Phase III SBIR contracts, and has been featured twice as an SBIR Success Story (see for example https://www.sbir.gov/node/1526807).
https://www.sbir.gov/node/1526807
...
The requested page could not be found.
Interestingly Joe Guerci is a pre-Trump-appointed Special Government Employee:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/joe-guerci-505aa26/
Special Government Employee (SGE)
US Army · Part-time Nov 2024 - Present · 6 mos
- Consultant to Army Science Board
You're right of course and I have happily bought direct on previous occasions and was delighted to know my money was primarily going straight into BrainChip's coffers.
Do you know if the system where the company traded gets a portion or tariff on each transaction as you outlined is in practice anywhere?
Seems a great idea to me also.
I guess the administration cost of it could be quite high, but on a large scale the bots would amortise it?
Probably unlikely the BEOT would ever allow it.
They own the game and why would they want to see it changed in any way, out of their favour.
And yes, the wins are welcome, but it just seems very itty bitty.
To continue to exist we need to become commercial and that's what I have been told (by Sean and Antonio and Ken and anyone else I have spoken too) has been high on the company's agenda for at least the last two full years.
I'm not saying "nothing" has occurred in this regard, but as far as revenue and commercial viability of the company is concerned, it's been pretty uninspiring.
And the lower our share price is pushed the more the necessary fund raising to keep the company going costs, and the greater the dilutionary effect it has on existing holdings and you and I, the holders.
We have been asked to buy in on Seans 5 year plan, basically sight unseen.
That's sort of fair enough, I guess.
He doesn't want to telegraph his moves to the competition.
I get that.
But given the progress to date, and considering the proposed re domicile, I'm personally over the glad handing and hearty knowing smiles and would like some honest and sincere information regarding just where exactly we are at, in regards to the plan.
Are we on track and on schedule?
What's going right and what's going wrong and what are they doing to fix it, or speed it up, or are significant results expected sooner or later than the proposed magic 5 years?
Sorry to bitch and moan everyone.
I know none of you have the answers to these questions.
I'll shut up for a while.
GLTAH