BRN Discussion Ongoing

Look, I know “no salary” sounds bad. That’s because it is bad. But as I tried explaining a week or so ago to that so-called crypto recovery expert (AKA scamming bastard), I am currently busted-ar$e and stone-cold broke, so I can't afford to pay them a brass razoo I'm afraid.

I'm operating under the highly sophisticated financial model known as "skint". It’s a lean model. Very lean. Largely funded by the rather underwhelming performance of certain shares we shall not name but definitely own.

Aside from that, I haven’t exactly received formal board approval from Sean to start recruiting and paying a roaming band of agricultural ambassadors with mullets, VB's and a trestle table with a wrinkled tablecloth.

That said, Harry Cool and Smoothy will absolutely be compensated - just not fiscally.

They’ll be paid in fresh country air, confused looks from brawny blokes in RM Williams and flannies and the wonderful aroma of fresh cow manure.

Some companies offer bonuses. I am offering them a character-building opportunity.

And if they manage to sell our tech to some big agricultural businesses, we can all chip in and buy them something really nice, like an Engel fridge to keep their VB's cold. Which, ironically, will still use more power than Akida.

Bravo... I have to reread your notes there worth several reads to lift ones spirits.. to funny 😁
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Bot ping pong madness and this sh*t is legal
So we have shorters on the asx, question price wise how does our shareprice line up against the other stockmarkets BRN, are they the same value, or 1 market is greater by 20 % or are they all even
 

TheDrooben

Pretty Pretty Pretty Pretty Good
The tech behind robotics is moving fast, even in just 12 months,.......especially in China. Someone is going to have to try and match it......




Happy as Larry
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users

Rach2512

Regular
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 10 users

FuzM

Regular
Had another look at the ForwardEdge post on LinkedIn. It is filled with information to the brim and focused on EW, Radar, ISR and etc.

1. They are working towards Heterogenous Integration Platform aka SHIP 2.0 (State-of-the-art Heterogeneous Integrated Packaging). SHIP existed back in 2020. SHIP
"The theme is speed. The procurement system is built for it. The SHIP partners were chosen to accelerate the design cycle. Intel’s acquired FPGA prowess (Altera) is the key enabler of the rapid prototyping. The FPGA is not technology that will compete in high volumes or for cost-sensitive applications, but it is by far the fastest way to get hardware functionality into the field. The SHIP program also includes the other large FPGA supplier."

2. The players in the group of 19 people included RTX, Lockheed Martin, L3Harris, BAE Systems, JRC, Abraworks and etc.
Interesting to note that Abraworks mentions Neuromorphic on the Linkedin and working with NATO and partners. The rest of the members are highly focused on RF systems or deeply involved with DARPA & DOD

3. Dr Jonathan Tapson is part of the 5th group to work on providing a Solution that is a 100% U.S.-designed, verifiable RISC-V–based IP portfolio with integrated root of security and controlled distribution. Within the group includes people from Abraworks, Rambus and Lockheed Martin. Also interesting to note, Nicole Petta of Rambus came from DoD.

Screenshot 2026-02-18 204953.png



4. During Brainchip's Technology Roadmap, Dr Jonathan Tapson's presentation included Neuromorphic (ISA) for Akida GenAI and Akida 3.


Screenshot 2026-02-18 204834.png


Screenshot 2026-02-18 204857.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 26 users

7für7

Top 20
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 5 users

Diogenese

Top 20
Had another look at the ForwardEdge post on LinkedIn. It is filled with information to the brim and focused on EW, Radar, ISR and etc.

1. They are working towards Heterogenous Integration Platform aka SHIP 2.0 (State-of-the-art Heterogeneous Integrated Packaging). SHIP existed back in 2020. SHIP
"The theme is speed. The procurement system is built for it. The SHIP partners were chosen to accelerate the design cycle. Intel’s acquired FPGA prowess (Altera) is the key enabler of the rapid prototyping. The FPGA is not technology that will compete in high volumes or for cost-sensitive applications, but it is by far the fastest way to get hardware functionality into the field. The SHIP program also includes the other large FPGA supplier."

2. The players in the group of 19 people included RTX, Lockheed Martin, L3Harris, BAE Systems, JRC, Abraworks and etc.
Interesting to note that Abraworks mentions Neuromorphic on the Linkedin and working with NATO and partners. The rest of the members are highly focused on RF systems or deeply involved with DARPA & DOD

3. Dr Jonathan Tapson is part of the 5th group to work on providing a Solution that is a 100% U.S.-designed, verifiable RISC-V–based IP portfolio with integrated root of security and controlled distribution. Within the group includes people from Abraworks, Rambus and Lockheed Martin. Also interesting to note, Nicole Petta of Rambus came from DoD.

View attachment 95212


4. During Brainchip's Technology Roadmap, Dr Jonathan Tapson's presentation included Neuromorphic (ISA) for Akida GenAI and Akida 3.


View attachment 95210

View attachment 95211
Hi FuzM,

With the emphasis on US IP, I thought that our Frontgrade Gaisler GR801 RISC-V experience would be ruled out because FG is Swedish, but Abraworks is British, so the players don't need to be US companies.

We are also working with other RISC-V processor companies like SiFive, Andes and Haila, so we do have a lot of irons in the RISC-V fire.

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7380715727152123904/

Great to be publicly announcing AbraWorks the advanced Aerospace and Defence Skunk Works based on our custom low SWAP Neuromorphic AI processing platform at last.
Neural Networks embedded from edge UxV platform to Data Centre and every layer in between to create next generation non linear analysis capabilities

1771424754770.png


Forward edge is owned by Lockheed:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/forwardedge-asic/about/

FE was the organizer, but Forge the Future includes other companies such as RTX, BEA\, so they see the advantage in adopting some standardization.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users


Makes you wonder if they'll include us in all their opportunities or are we just an optional add on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Akiwi

Jonathan Tapson brainchip gives his talk on neuromorphic edge ai, starts @ about 1hr 6min in


Very interesting
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 9 users


Live now

As edge AI systems scale, the limitations of traditional von Neumann computing—separate memory and processing, high data movement, and power inefficiency—are becoming increasingly apparent. Neuromorphic computing offers a fundamentally different approach, inspired by the structure and operation of the human brain, enabling event-driven, ultra-low-power, real-time intelligence at the edge. In this inaugural EDGE AI Neuromorphic Livestream, we bring together industry leaders, researchers, and system builders to explore how neuromorphic AI is moving from research into real-world deployment. The session will examine architectures, sensing and control applications, training methods, and benchmarking practices across both small-scale and large-scale systems. Designed for technologists, researchers, and decision-makers, this livestream will provide practical insights into where neuromorphic AI delivers real value today—and where it is headed next. Tune in for these talks from:
  • Innatera
  • University of Southern California
  • Brainchip
  • Harvard University
  • Spinncloud
  • Delft University
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 12 users
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 6 users


Live now

As edge AI systems scale, the limitations of traditional von Neumann computing—separate memory and processing, high data movement, and power inefficiency—are becoming increasingly apparent. Neuromorphic computing offers a fundamentally different approach, inspired by the structure and operation of the human brain, enabling event-driven, ultra-low-power, real-time intelligence at the edge. In this inaugural EDGE AI Neuromorphic Livestream, we bring together industry leaders, researchers, and system builders to explore how neuromorphic AI is moving from research into real-world deployment. The session will examine architectures, sensing and control applications, training methods, and benchmarking practices across both small-scale and large-scale systems. Designed for technologists, researchers, and decision-makers, this livestream will provide practical insights into where neuromorphic AI delivers real value today—and where it is headed next. Tune in for these talks from:
  • Innatera
  • University of Southern California
  • Brainchip
  • Harvard University
  • Spinncloud
  • Delft University

Must be pre recorded so if you only want to watch the brainchip part it starts at the 1 hour 6 minute mark
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 8 users

TheDrooben

Pretty Pretty Pretty Pretty Good
Just wondering if your interpretation of the $4 - $50 price per chip has changed since last year?
No

Happy as Larry
 
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 3 users

perceptron

Regular
So
No

Happy as Larry
So you believe that the variable costs to produce a silicon chip ($2.94) are the only costs requested by a chip foundry and that the receiving company is selling those chips to end users using a price per chip range of $4 - $50? Have you considered what other costs are associated with producing silicon chips that a foundry must include? For example; salaries, capital expenditure (those big buildings that house those expensive machines that make the chips), research and development and other costs that are fixed regardless of the amount ordered?
 

7für7

Top 20
So

So you believe that the variable costs to produce a silicon chip ($2.94) are the only costs requested by a chip foundry and that the receiving company is selling those chips to end users using a price per chip range of $4 - $50? Have you considered what other costs are associated with producing silicon chips that a foundry must include? For example; salaries, capital expenditure (those big buildings that house those expensive machines that make the chips), research and development and other costs that are fixed regardless of the amount ordered?
If you tell me whether it’s for a forum, LinkedIn, or a chat, I’ll tailor it to the exact tone. Do you want it a bit more aggressive but still factual, or more laid-back with an ironic vibe? Just let me know.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
"Watch us now!".......................................
.......................................................⏰🐌
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 2 users

TheDrooben

Pretty Pretty Pretty Pretty Good
So

So you believe that the variable costs to produce a silicon chip ($2.94) are the only costs requested by a chip foundry and that the receiving company is selling those chips to end users using a price per chip range of $4 - $50? Have you considered what other costs are associated with producing silicon chips that a foundry must include? For example; salaries, capital expenditure (those big buildings that house those expensive machines that make the chips), research and development and other costs that are fixed regardless of the amount ordered?
It states the costs and price are both essentially variable.....cost to produce is variable around the $2.94 stated and price of sale is variable between $4-$50 depending on volume. Other costs may result in different prices for both the cost and sale price. They never stated exact definitive prices for either.

Happy as Larry
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

7für7

Top 20
"Watch us now!".......................................
.......................................................⏰🐌
Unwatchable… igno
 
Top Bottom